Le Pen’s ID Group Prepares to Merge With Orbán’s Patriots Next Monday
The national leaders of the Identity and Democracy (ID) group are planning to have their constitutive meeting on Monday, July 8th, right after the second round of the French elections has concluded. Sources suggest their plan is to rebrand under the umbrella of Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán’s new outfit, the ‘Patriots for Europe.’
As we reported, the new right-wing sovereigntist political alliance between Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party, the Czech ANO, and the Austrian FPÖ was launched last Sunday in Vienna. The Hungarian prime minister promised that it would “very quickly” grow into the third largest group in the European Parliament (EP), prompting a flurry of speculation about prospective additional allies.
Any alliance that wishes to register as a parliamentary group in Brussels (to benefit from the numerous advantages it comes with) needs to have at least 23 MEPs representing at least seven countries. The three founding members of the Patriots already had 24 seats between them—26 if you count Portugal’s Chega, the first to join the group earlier this week—so the only criterion left to meet was the required number of national delegations.
The founders’ confidence that they would not only reach the required threshold, but become the third largest group in the Parliament by overtaking Giorgia Meloni’s ECR with its 84 seats, suggests that negotiations with new members were nearing conclusion already. Earlier, disclosures from Matteo Salvini’s Lega party—a founding member of ID—indicated that the plan was to expand and rebrand ID under the Patriots’ banner all along.
Now, sources close to the negotiations confirmed these rumors to Bloomberg, saying that the ID leaders are planning to meet with the Patriots and hold a joint constitutive meeting on Monday, July 8th, right after the French elections have concluded. The initial deadline for parliamentary reshuffles was July 4th, but several delegations as well as the ID group itself requested an extension given the circumstances in France.
At the same time, it also became clear that the merger would be a necessary step for ID to survive. With the Austrian FPÖ and Portugal’s Chega switching to the Patriots, as well as the independent Estonian MEP, Madison Jaak, joining the ECR on Wednesday, ID no longer meets the seven-delegations criterion alone.
The current six ID members (in decreasing order based on their number of MEPs) are Marine Le Pen’s French National Rally (RN), the Italian Lega, the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV), the Flemish Vlaams Belang, the Czech SPD, and the Danish People’s Party.
Together, these six parties now hold 49 seats, with 30 of those belonging to RN alone. Together with the four Patriots, that number would only grow to 75, however, ten fewer than what’s needed to overtake the ECR and become the third-largest group in Brussels.
The Polish Law and Justice (PiS) with its 21 MEPs was also considering jumping ship due to minor ideological differences but then decided on Wednesday to remain in ECR in exchange for influential positions in the group.
The German AfD could have also solved the problem by adding its 15 seats to the Patriots. However, “that is not an option for the AfD at the moment,” the party’s co-president Alice Weidel said on Tuesday evening, citing technical misalignment with the founding members of the Patriots, all three of whom are either in government or looking to form one in the near future.
“If the prospective head of government in Austria decides to go with the head of government in Hungary, it is an alliance of government parties,” Weidel said. As a result, they are subject to “political as well as foreign policy and foreign trade constraints, which we currently have to take into account.”
As our sources have also suggested before, large German companies (often tied to mainstream parties such as CDU and SPD) are among the most important trading partners of many Central European countries, including Hungary, whose government wouldn’t want to compromise its trade relations by teaming up with AfD.
This leaves AfD to go with its back-up plan of trying to create its own group with smaller parties that are deemed too extreme (or nationally incompatible) to join ECR and ID under the name ‘The Sovereignists.’ With a few prospective partners barred from entering due to antisemitism allegations, however, it’s unclear whether they’d succeed in reaching the required threshold.
As for the Patriots, they would still need to find a few new allies by Monday if they want to achieve their goal of becoming the third largest. These might include Slovakia’s ruling Smer with five seats—although it said it wouldn’t join—or the Spanish Se Acabó La Fiesta (SALF) with three seats. Nonetheless, we will only know the final composition once the French election is over.
Gender-Confused Ex-Mcdonald’s Worker Awarded 7,000 Euros After Bosses Called Him by Legal Name
(LifeSiteNews) — On June 24, a French court in Angers awarded 22-year-old “Syntia” Dersoir €7,000 after ruling that the gender-confused man was discriminated against by his former employer for being referred to by his legal birth name and told not to wear an abundance of makeup during work hours.
Dersoir had lodged a complaint against a McDonald’s franchise in Segré-en-Anjou Bleu where he had worked from September 2022 after management allegedly called him by his legal, male name, and requested that he remove the makeup he began donning during work hours.
In 2022, Dersoir was hired under his birth name and was legally registered as a male. In early 2023, he started donning makeup and prosthetic breasts while at work.
Dersoir claimed he was told by his supervisor that his new appearance was inappropriate in the work environment.
“She told me she couldn’t accept me in the field, that I had to take off some lipstick,” Dersoir said, alluding to his supervisor. “It still didn’t fit. She told me that if I wanted, I could go to the Super U to buy some make-up remover and come back, or else I could go home. I went home.”
The next day, Dersoir claimed another of his superiors told him:
You impose your choices on us, you only think about yourself, you get us into trouble.
— Article continues below Petition —Tell school to apologize for suspending Canadian student who wore gender-critical sweater.
Following Dersoir’s complaint to the French Labour Inspectorate, the French Democratic Confederation of Labour (CFDT) provided him a lawyer. Deerosir then lodged a criminal complaint against the management at the McDonald’s where he had been employed.
Reacting to Dersoir’s accusations, the lawyer representing McDonald’s, Maître Pascal Landais, maintained that management had merely requested that Dersoir abide by the McDonald’s workplace makeup policy that all staff had to follow.
“We asked him to tone down his make-up, not to remove it,” Landais asserted. The McDonald’s policy stipulated that all employees should don “light and discreet makeup” only for both uniform and hygiene purposes.
Predictably, leftist French establishment media outlets have sought to paint Dersoir as a victim of “gender discrimination.” Ouest-France insinuated that Dersoir’s employers were “guilty of moral harassment and discrimination.”
Dersoir is the second man claiming to be a woman in Europe to take legal action against a local McDonald’s for “gender discrimination”.
In Germany, Kylie Divon, 27, a gender-confused male known as Keil Li, is demandingfinancial compensation for alleged “discrimination” by McDonald’s after purporting he was refused entry to his employer’s changing room meant for female employees. Li lodged his complaint after a Muslim woman and colleague asked him to leave the women’s changing room, as per an interview with Siegessaeule. Divon alleged that the co-worker who told him to leave the women’s changing room was a Muslim woman who accurately told him that he was “biologically seen as a man” – a statement that he claimed was discriminatory, Reduxx reported.
Big Pharma Makes Huge Profits From The Transgender Movement – and Their Vaccines Could be Causing it
Could vaccines be changing some people’s brain chemistry in a way that makes them more likely to experience gender dysphoria? Many people who say they are transgender are convinced they’ve always felt this way, but there is some evidence that this could be related to vaccine injury in some individuals.
Autism researcher Dr. Toby Rogers drew attention to the link between vaccine injury and gender dysphoria in an article entitled “Trans messaging is too sophisticated to be the work of a small sexual minority dealing with severe health issues.”
He tackles the topic from the point of view of someone who has fought for LGBT equality and studied gender topics in depth. He said that the message has changed in recent years from the idea that sex is biological while gender is socially constructed to the claim that biological sex itself is somehow a social construct.
He wrote: “The LGBT movement went from “God does not make mistakes” (acceptance) to God as a drunken factory worker who often mixes up parts (get thee to a surgeon for repair!) in the space of just a few years.”
“The modern trans movement does not appear to be a natural outgrowth of the feminist or even gay, lesbian, and bisexual acceptance movement. It is my strong belief that something else altogether is going on here,” he added, and went on to make a convincing case for how the pharmaceutical industry is causing, supporting and benefiting from gender dysphoria.
He points to dozens of studies showing that individuals who experience gender dysphoria have a much higher likelihood of also being autistic, and vice versa. And since autism has often been linked to vaccine injury and toxins inside vaccines, and autistic people are also more likely to be trans, it stands to reason that gender dysphoria could also stem from a vaccine injury.
Interestingly, this would also explain why the trans population suddenly seems to be exploding. Elderly people who were not subject to lengthy vaccine schedules in childhood are much less likely to be trans than younger populations.
The trans movement is a win-win for Big Pharma
It’s probably not a coincidence that the transgender movement gives Big Pharma the perfect way to cover up vaccine injuries. There are people out there who have legitimate feelings of not quite identifying with certain typical male or female behaviors or interests, but the idea that this stems from something inside of them that they’ve suppressed for all their life rather than something that was caused by a vaccine altering their brain chemistry in some way shifts the blame from the pharmaceutical companies to the individual.
Then there’s the most obvious benefit, which is the enormous profitability involved in transition surgery, hormone treatments and other “gender affirming” care. In many of these cases, people must continue taking gender-altering medications for life. No matter which route a person who feels their body doesn’t align with how they perceive themselves takes, pharmaceutical companies win. Even if someone decides against hormones or surgery, there is a good chance they will turn to psychiatric medications to manage their feelings.
“Pharma uses the trans community to make money and normalizes sexual dysphoria to cover up the evidence of Pharma’s crimes,” Rogers asserts.
Of course, other factors might also be to blame for the rising trans movement, or it could be a combination of environmental and social factors. For example, there is no question that young people today are being exposed to unprecedented amounts of endocrine disruptors thanks to the prevalence of plastics in our environment, the overuse of highly toxic pesticides and hormones in everything from poultry to dairy and fish. We already know that pesticides like atrazine can turn male tadpoles into females – and on top of environmental exposure, these chemicals could have also made their way into vaccines.
Rogers also gives us another interesting question to ponder: if vaccines can indeed cause gender dysphoria, how else might they alter one’s thinking?
“Once the brain and gut are injured ALL relationships are changed, not just friendships and intimate partnerships. All interactions in the world are changed,” he warned.
Israel Has Bombed Lebanon Over 6,000 Times Since October
The Israeli army has conducted 6,142 attacks on Lebanese soil, resulting in at least 543 deaths between October 7 last year and June 21 this year, according to an analysis by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED).
Aita al-Shaab, a Shia-majority village near the Israeli border that saw 85 homes destroyed during the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah war, has been targeted in 300 of these attacks.
(Related: Israel OKs plans for ALL-OUT WAR in Lebanon to wipe out Hezbollah.)
Other frequently targeted towns include Ras al-Naqoura (246 attacks), which houses the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) headquarters; Hula (219 attacks), where dozens of unarmed men were killed by the Israeli army in 1948; Kfarchouba (218 attacks), the second largest village in southern Lebanon; and Kfar Kila (209 attacks).
While most attacks have been concentrated in southern villages, Israeli drones and jets have also targeted the cities of Tyre and Saida, as well as various locations in the Bekaa Valley in northern Lebanon.
Western media reports indicate that the near-daily airstrikes, artillery shelling and the use of incendiary chemical white phosphorus by the Israeli army have rendered much of the five-kilometer (3.1-mile) zone north of the border “uninhabitable,” displacing over 95,000 people in southern Lebanon.
Residents have faced significant destruction of infrastructure, including homes, schools and hospitals, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis.
Hezbollah, other armed groups fight back
ACLED reports that Hezbollah and other armed groups near the border are responsible for 1,258 attacks on Israeli soil.
However, figures released by the resistance on June 13 indicate a total of 2,125 attacks since October 8. Many of these attacks have targeted Kiryat Shmona (132 attacks), Margaliyot (91 attacks) and Metula (72 attacks).
Other targets include military bases, barracks and airfields. According to Tel Aviv, these attacks have resulted in the deaths of at least 21 Israelis.
Hezbollah reported that its military actions have displaced over 200,000 Israelis, forcing the evacuation of over 40 settlements and striking up to 35 kilometers into the occupied territories.
In recent weeks, Israel has escalated threats to expand the war against Lebanon to regain control of its northern settlements, causing significant concern among international observers and humanitarian organizations.
The conflict has strained Israel’s relationship with its U.S. backers, who are advocating for a diplomatic resolution.
“We’re urgently seeking a diplomatic agreement that restores lasting calm to Israel’s northern border and enables civilians to return safely to their homes on both sides of the Israel–Lebanon border,” U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin stated on June 25 following a meeting with his Israeli counterpart in Washington.
The U.S. has also been working with other international actors to broker a ceasefire and provide humanitarian aid to affected areas in both countries.
Less than two weeks ago, Israel said it was prepared for an “all-out war” in Lebanon with approved plans to target Hezbollah, officials announced following the release of threatening drone footage by Hezbollah.
The footage showed civilian and military areas of Haifa, prompting a strong response from Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz, who warned that Hezbollah would be destroyed and Lebanon severely hit in a war.
The Israeli military confirmed that plans for a ground assault across the northern border have been approved by Ori Gordin, head of the Northern Command. This comes amid ongoing border skirmishes since the October 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza, which has killed at least 37,000 Palestinians.
The conflict has resulted in over 400 deaths and 90,000 displacements in Lebanon, with 25 deaths and 60,000 displacements in Israel. The U.S. is working to prevent further escalation, with White House envoy Amos Hochstein emphasizing President Joe Biden’s aim to avoid a greater war.
Head over to WWIII.news for similar stories.
Watch this video of Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah warning Israel of a war “without limits and consequences” if it attacks Lebanon.
Here’s how NATO and The West are Planning to Trigger WWIII
A whistleblower insider from the United Kingdom Parliament claims that the West is chomping at the bit to launch nuclear weapons and spark a third world war between the Zionist-controlled Anglo-American Axis and the BRICS alliance using massive deception.
UK Member of Parliament (MP) Andrew Bridgen says NATO and its many tentacle nations are planning to stage a false flag attack, probably on a European city, by planting and detonating a nuclear “dirty bomb.” Then in the aftermath, NATO and its members and allies will blame Russia for the attack as a pretext to launch nuclear war.
Bridgen’s anecdotal evidence comes from various defense analysts in military intelligence whom he says told him that there is a lot of nuclear material being transferred all over the place right because of the situation in Ukraine. Some of that material is being diverted for false flag purposes, he says – watch the video below for key portion of a recent interview with Bridgen:
British Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen is warning the world that NATO is planning to launch a false flag attack on a European city using a nuclear “dirty bomb” and to put the blame on Russia.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) June 23, 2024
Bridgen says he is receiving information from defense analysts in military… pic.twitter.com/9VUc8a6wXs
(Related: Did you know that Joe Biden is supposedly sending F-16s to Ukraine right now in defiance of Russia’s red lines?)
False flags always seem to get the job done for tyrants
All throughout history, tyrannical regimes have staged false flag events like the one Bridgen says will happen in order to catalyze their agenda. Their method is simple: strike a target and simply blame the opposition as justification for taking action against the opposition – this is also known as a problem, reaction, solution agenda.
The West is setting the stage for this false flag by pushing the bear hard really right now, crossing every red line issued by Moscow. President Putin is showing great restraint for now, but there will eventually come a time when Russia has no choice but to respond to the constant provocation from the country’s enemies.
The UK where Bridgen serves is right now conducting missile attacks from Ukrainian territory, which is only escalating the matter even further. Any day now, expect to see even more fireworks leading straight to WWIII.
By the way, if you are interested in watching the full interview with Bridgen, you can do so below:
“People need to realize that our enemy isn’t Russia,” wrote someone on YouTube about this whole affair.
“The enemy is within,” responded another.
“Andrew is one of the most courageous politicians in the former ‘great’ Britain,” said another. “If only the millions of people in this nation actually stood up for the country and the future of their children and grandchildren instead of cowering in their homes in fear.”
All Zionist agencies, noted another, wage war “by way of deception.” This includes Mossad, the CIA, NATO and all the rest.
“Russia is under attack and there will be retribution,” said the same person.
“Here’s what happened:
Step 1: NATO supplied the weapons
Step 2: Mossad / CIA did the recruiting and training
Step 3: Controlled opposition media blames ‘Islamists’
The war against Russia is a war against Christianity.”
Finally, someone pointed out that all of these wars are about money, power and influence.
“No citizen gets or has any ‘added value’ from this nonsense. This must stop. Wars must stop.”
How much longer do you think it will be before the nukes start flying? Find out more at WWIII.news.
NewsGuard Co-Founder Advocates Banning Anonymous Social Media Posts, Enabling Lawsuits Against Tech Firms for ‘False’ Content
NewsGuard co-founder and co-CEO Steve Brill has published a book, “The Death of Truth” – but he’s not taking any responsibility. On the contrary.
Namely, Brill’s “apolitical (misinformation) rating system for news sites” as NewsGuard is promoted to customers, is often blasted – and currently investigated by Congress for possible First Amendment violations – as yet another tool to suppress online speech.
But corporate media sing his praises, presenting him as a “media maven.”
A censorship maven more like it, critics would say. And while getting his book promoted, Brill managed to add his name to the steadily growing list of governments, NGOs, and associated figures who are attacking online anonymity.
Along with end-to-end encryption, the ability to interact anonymously is a cornerstone of the internet, but these two key elements that ensure not only privacy but also the security of individuals, companies, etc., have become the two main targets for authoritarian (labeled as such or acting in that spirit) governments.
Brill’s contribution: a set of practical solutions that includes “banning anonymous posting online and funding media literacy programs.”
The problem that this is supposed to fix is, essentially, that social media platforms are not yet fully under control, and therefore neither are their users (and voters).
If anonymity were to be taken out of the equation, Brill is reported as saying – then it would be “easier to sue tech companies for the false content posted on their platforms,” as well as “waging legal campaigns against social media companies for violating their own terms of service.”
There’s another snippet of a veiled threat aimed at tech companies, in terms of what might happen to them if they “misbehave,” (such as letting up on the already extraordinary levels of censorship), especially during a campaign season.
Reporting about Brill’s Washington DC garden party to promote his book and the efforts to “clean up the internet and bring truth back to life” – the Washington Post repeatedly mentions “bad information” as that ominous source of “divisions” and “polarization.”
We’ve been hearing about “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and even “malinformation” that must be fought tooth and nail. But what is “bad information” – could it simply be information that one doesn’t like?
Whatever it is, Brill and his ilk seem willing to dismantle the internet itself, in order to get rid of it.