Southport: The End of the Line
Southport is the end of the line for me, I’m afraid. I refuse to play this game any longer. So “No” Prime Minister Starmer, you do not speak for me—I am not remotely “shocked” that the caravan of mass slaughter has made an unscheduled stop in Southport. “Au contraire,” Your Majesties, I do not find it difficult to “imagine what the families, friends and loved ones are going through” (and doubtless, given time neither will the rest of you). And it’s “Uh-uh” to you too, Home Secretary Cooper, my “thoughts and prayers” already have a prior engagement; resigned to the hope that the “refugees welcome” conniving bastards like you are one day held accountable for the blood on your hands. I’m sick of it all, but mostly I’m sick of the innocent picking up the bar tab for the multicultural piss-up they were denied entry to.
As the tally currently stands, it’s three beautiful princesses dead and a further nine seriously injured at the hands of an unknown savage. The perpetrators of these unholy acts don’t just stick to targeting politicians. It’s innocent children they invariably favour—the younger and purer the better. Slashing the throats of toddlers was about as much of a challenge Syrian “refugee” Abdalmasih Hanoun could stomach in Annecy last June. The Algerian, Riad Bouchaker, made much the same calculation in Parnell Square, Dublin last November. Thus far, pretty much all we know about the bloodbath in Stockport is that we definitely don’t know anything.
We know this because the media and the authorities have assured us of their utter incuriosity. The furthest Merseyside Police were prepared to go was a “17-year-old boy from the village of Banks.” For clarity, they added the following:
The youth, who cannot be named for legal reasons and is originally from Cardiff, moved to the Southport area with his Rwandan parents when he was aged six.
Funnily enough, every Llewelyn Jones I’ve ever met has a remarkably similar story.
Chief Constable Serena Kennedy treated us to the full “I know it looks like terrorism, but we don’t want you to think it’s terrorism – even though we think it’s terrorism” routine:
The investigation is in its early stages, and the motivation for the incident remains unclear. However, Counter-Terrorism Police North West have offered their support to Merseyside Police, as the full circumstances of what has happened are being established. At this moment in time, the investigation is not being treated as terrorist related.
Two children have died and nine have been injured, including six who are in a critical condition, following the stabbings in Southport, Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said. pic.twitter.com/6DgTTOCTH3
— Talk (@TalkTV) July 29, 2024
Not to be outdone, Councillor Marion Atkinson just went for good old-fashioned gaslighting:
We know this has caused concern and upset in the local community and while there is no immediate threat to the public, we will be providing help and support in the coming days and weeks.
“Concern and upset”’ Marion? “No immediate threat”? Well, I suppose the lad’s gotta break out of clink first, right?
The media meanwhile, were having a field day. “Two children die and nine injured after ‘ferocious’ knife attack in Southport,” smirked The Guardian, as though the adjective “ferocious” was a bit racy for a mere attempted massacre. The BBC went one better: “Two children dead and nine injured in dance workshop” (the “stabbing” part regrettably too long for the web page to include), making it sound like the workshop itself was responsible for the carnage.
Not content with that, BBC News’ Home Affairs Correspondent, Daniel Sandford, was at a loss when quizzed about recent mass stabbings in Britain (Reading, Streatham, London Bridge?), and had to go back to Dunblane 1996. Sure, it was a mass shooting rather than a stabbing, but at least it had the preferred white male perpetrator in the title role:
Dunblane wasn’t a mass stabbing @BBCDanielS , Dunblane was a mass shooting!
— Andrew Roberts ??️??️⚧️ (@AndyMRoberts) July 29, 2024
Please get your facts right and stop the speculation on fatalities and number of fatalities!https://t.co/8lQ8TVORvD pic.twitter.com/NjZsqILL4U
Had it been a white Brit in Southport, we’d have had his name, his age, and his mum’s Reform UK membership card by teatime. Of course, there’s always the danger that the public might overreact and insensitively object to the slaughter or maiming of their daughters. Luckily, seasoned pro and Mayor of Liverpool City Region, Steve Rotheram, urged them not to spread “unconfirmed speculation and false information.”
Question: How do they know it’s “false” if they don’t know what it is yet?
Social media reports should of course be taken with a pinch of salt. But there comes a point when the official line is so corrupt, the alternatives have to be considered. The Spectator writer, Steven Barrett, claims police have contacted him to say that their priority re the stabbings is that “our response is managed.” I find that spectacularly easy to believe.
The Liberal response, on the other hand, does not need management: it’s identical, no matter how disparate the facts. Suppose the assailant turns out to be “Gareth Thomas,” Valleys born and bred. In that case, he’ll be a paid-up member of the far-right faster than you can say “Nigel Farage.” If on the other hand, he turns out to be an asylum seeker, illegal immigrant or Muslim, then it’s the far-right that radicalised him. Win-win!
But even sticking with the official line, we have an enormous problem on our hands. The 17-year-old in question was born in Britain. That’s not quite the “own” the Left thinks it is. Not only then has multiculturalism failed as our ultra-liberal leaders keep telling us, it’s an aggressive cancer that’s metastasising. The fact is that 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants to Britain are more radical than their parents—which means the time bomb is ticking and gets deadlier the longer you leave it.
How did we get to this? Even in my lifetime, Britain is now unrecognisable—and I don’t just mean the demographics. The police will now protect your pronouns but not your person; Tommy Robinson is more likely to have his collar felt than Anjem Choudary; and the architects of Britain’s demise, the Labour Party, have just been re-elected with the largest majority in their history. Something’s got to give.
The Left may simper, “This is no time for knee-jerk reactions.” But they are of course wrong. Knee-jerk reactions are underrated at the best of times, but in response to the attempted mass slaughter of little girls, I’d be tempted to shoot first and ask questions very, very much later.
This is what now needs to happen in Britain with immediate effect:
- The Channel migrant farce needs to end today; no ifs, no buts. Not one, single illegal migrant should make it onto the beach at Dover before he’s thrown back into his dinghy, and towed back to mainland France.
- The asylum backlog needs to be cleared as a priority, with circa 95% rejected rather than accepted.
- The estimated 1.2 million illegal migrants in Britain (those are the ‘official’ figures, mind) need to be rounded up and deported.
- Order needs to be restored on our streets, and that means an end to two-tier policing. The Army can be deployed if necessary.
- Every ghetto, mosque and madrasa from which extremism appears to emanate needs to be investigated, radically overhauled or closed as necessary.
- Any lingering enemies of Britain desirous of committing criminal acts are free to languish at His Majesty’s pleasure. Prisons cut crime and save lives; more can be built.
- The cost of this is obviously immaterial, considering the lives it will save and the already shocking degree of waste in the public purse, but we could certainly make a start with the £15 billion Foreign Aid Budget, Ed Milliband’s £11.6 billion Climate Aid, and Ukraine’s “£3 billion a year as long as it takes.”
Doubtless, a few lefty lawyers, NGOs, world leaders and the ECHR will object to such policies. So what? What are they going to do, invade us?!
As a fresh, incoming Prime Minister, Keir Starmer now has a golden opportunity to get tough on terrorism and put the country back on track, starting with the above as a bare minimum. He won’t do any of it, of course, which is why civil war is regrettably inevitable.
I don’t mean the civil war ten years down the line; I mean the one that’s been waging for years. It’s just that our leaders have convinced us to look the other way, and only one side has been fighting. There is unrest everywhere you look on the streets of Britain: whether it’s pro-Palestine thuggery or the riots in Leicester and Leeds. The difference is, there is suddenly a palpable sense that the British have had enough.
This weekend’s peaceful “We want our country back” demonstration in Trafalgar Square may just have been the calm before the storm. Let’s hope our politicians break the habit of a lifetime, and start prioritising the safety of the British people. If they do not, things are going to get real ugly very soon.
BOMBSHELL PROOF: Acting Secret Service Director Caught In Massive Perjury
BREAKING VIDEO: UN Spokesperson Calls for NATO/UN Troops to Occupy Western Nations to Enforce Lockdowns, Force Injections
On the Sunday show Alex Jones covered video of Peter Hotez calling for global forced inoculation.
Don’t miss:
Desantis Admin Investigates Leftists who Terrorized Christian Family with Fake Abuse Accusations
(LifeSiteNews) — Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is intervening in the case of a Christian military couple who fell victim to an internet harassment campaign that led to false child abuse charges being filed against them.
The Family Freedom Project (FFP) explains that JD and Britney Lott met while serving in the military, and after marrying settled in Lubbock, Texas. Eventually they and their eight children took to traveling the nation, chronicling their travels on Instagram while homeschooling.
Their American Family Road Trip account grew in popularity, but with support also came anonymous online detractors, especially from a Reddit discussion forum called FundieSnarkUncensored, which is dedicated to vitriol against conservative Christians.
On April 29 of this year, while staying in Florida and planning to travel to Georgia, they noticed disturbing comments alleging their one-week-old baby Boone had “severe sunburn, was lethargic, and had jaundice.” After deleting the comment, they proceeded with their trip the next morning until receiving a call from Florida Child Protective Services (CPS).
Reviewing FundieSnarkUncensored revealed that members of the group openly discussed how to report the family to authorities, and even determined their physical location to determine where to send the allegations.
The CPS caseworker “quoted verbatim from the Instagram comment Britney had seen earlier,” explaining that they had obtained her phone number after conducting a welfare check where the family’s RV had been. “The investigator seemed understanding during the call, which ended without further action required,” FFP continues, but later that day, JD had missed a call from Walton County, Florida’s Department of Children & Families (DCF), which was followed up with a text warning threatening to issue a nationwide “Order to Take Into Custody” if the message was not returned.
They reached out to the Texas-based FFP, which found an attorney for them in Florida and arranged a meeting with DCF at a nearby hospital. It eventually determined that the children were not being mistreated, but not before frightening the children with a squad car pulling up behind them, lights flashing. The case was closed with no further danger to the family, but far-left Redditors continued their harassment and police and medical staff alike expressed shock that the situation had gone so far in the first place.
On Thursday, DeSantis spokesman Bryan Griffin told The Daily Wire that “[u]tilizing government entities to make false reports or harass others is unacceptable and will be referred to law enforcement for investigation and ultimately prosecution.”
Florida DCF added that while it is “required to investigate all allegations of abuse, neglect, or abandonment to ensure the safety of children,” it is also the case that “[f]alse reports are reported to law enforcement for criminal investigation and prosecution. Filing a false report is a felony with legal consequences, as outlined in 39.205, F.S., and is also a drain on Department resources dedicated to protecting children from abuse and exploitation.” The agency confirmed that law enforcement is now investigating the false allegations.
In an emailed statement “applauding” the DeSantis administration, FFP vice president Jeremy Newman declared the “time for accountability and reform to Child Protective Services in the United States is long overdue. The Lott family story is just the latest example of a long line of outrageous and unjust cases across the country where a states’ child protective services agency has been weaponized and turned against an innocent and unassuming family.”
BOMBSHELL PROOF: Acting Secret Service Director Caught In Massive Perjury
North Korea Claims To Have Deployed Nuclear-capable Launchers to South Korean Border
Over 250 missile launchers capable of delivering nuclear missiles have been deployed to North Korea’s front-line units on the border with its neighbor South Korea, according to North Korean state media.
The missile launchers provide a “new offensive weapon of our armed forces,” said the country’s leader, Kim Jong Un, at a ceremony to mark the deployment. He warned that nuclear capabilities were the best way to counter threats from the US, and that they would have a “particular deterrent effect.”
The launchers appear to be transporter-erector launchers fitted for the Hwasong-11D short-range ballistic missile, which North Korea has claimed are capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Each launcher can carry up to four missiles, meaning that 1,000 nuclear missiles could be stationed on the border with South Korea.
Missile tests for the Hwasong-11D platform were conducted in March and May of this year.
North Korea’s leader blamed the “U.S. and its followers’ ever-escalating military confrontation moves” for the production and deployment of the launchers.
Kim stated that Washington remains an “enemy state that our descendants will have to face for generations to come,” regardless of who occupies the White House.
“We will clearly let the U.S. know that if they ignore our repeated warnings and continue to try to cause disaster in the region, they could bring about fatal consequences for themselves.”
Kim added that “this is just the first stage of our plans of building up front-line missile forces.”
BOMBSHELL PROOF: Acting Secret Service Director Caught In Massive Perjury
UK PM Keir Starmer Uses Riots to Call for Mass Surveillance and Social Media Censorship
The more things change, the more they remain the same, at least in the UK; after many years of Tory governments’ vigorous efforts to extend mass surveillance indiscriminately targeting citizens and enact stringent anti-free speech laws, the new Labour government seems to be picking up right where the previous one left off.
The wake of the Southport riots has elicited the usual medley of reactions: moves to address societal issues with more surveillance, strengthen the police state, blame “misinformation” and unproven, but always handy to bring up, “foreign meddling.”
But the real malady seems to be squarely at home: in fact, in the prime minister’s office. Keir Starmer happens to be sitting there now, but the policy hardly ever changes: he, too, wants more mass surveillance based on facial recognition, and more pressure on social media to ramp up censorship.
If anything does change it is the intensity of these demands that have long since been rejected as “Orwellian” by rights groups like Big Brother Watch.
Here, Starmer told a news conference called after the events branded as far-right riots, that participants in the protests (whom he called “thugs” and compared with football hooligans) are “mobile” and for that reason, police forces will, going forward, be a part of a network of sorts.
The prime minister added that there will be intelligence and data sharing, as well as “wider deployment of facial recognition technology, and preventative action, criminal behavior orders to restrict their movements before they can even board a train, in just the same way that we do with football hooligans.”
Movement restrictions are said to apply only to those with previous convictions, and those who have committed “violence at protests.” But here things get complicated because even those who were charged with relatively minor offenses like disorderly conduct could end up having their movements surveilled and restricted.
Starmer isn’t in favor of enacting new laws; he seems satisfied that all this can be achieved within the existing legislation and announced a “coordinated response” within the police across the country and law enforcement taking advantage of those laws more than before. But he does want more police officers, and it seems that increasing their numbers will be one election campaign promise that will be kept.
Starmer is announcing these measures as a way to deal not with protests – he insists this is about “violent disorder.” And, he blames online platforms for being the places where that is being “whipped up.”
Meaning, that when the authorities decide some online speech can be considered as incitement to violence, that is, in Starmer’s words, “not a matter of free speech. It is a criminal offense.”
But what will the authorities consider incitement to violence? This is particularly important since a number of lawmakers – such as Labour MP Patrick Hurley, Former MI6 chief Richard Dearlove, and former Security Minister Stephen McPartland – blamed “misinformation” and “disinformation” as well as “speculation” regarding the identity of the Southport stabbing attacker.
Therefore if speculation can be considered misinformation, and misinformation incitement to violence – this opens the door wide to censor views expressed online that basically ask questions about something – i.e., “speculate”.
Regarding online platforms, the prime minister suggested that his approach to the police during a meeting that preceded the news conference (namely, “get the relevant people around the table, and fix the problems and meet the challenges that we have as a country”) will apply to internet platforms as well.
It remains to be seen what “work(ing) together to address the challenges” will look like once Starmer gets online platforms and government representatives at the same table.
Meanwhile, the idea of ushering in even more facial recognition-based mass surveillance is seen as terrible by groups like Big Brother Watch, who have campaigned for years against this type of policing.
The group’s director, Silkie Carlo, said in a statement that the pledge regarding facial recognition as response to public disorder was “alarming.”
According to her, democracy is threatened, not protected with this approach, while the type of mass surveillance pushed by Starmer (and previous governments) “turns members of the public into walking ID cards.”
Carlo made a point of the live facial recognition technology being “dangerously inaccurate,” “common” in Russia and China, supported by no clear legal basis in the UK, and, banned elsewhere in Europe
In her opinion, Starmer did not address the causes of the Southport attack (when three girls were murdered), or the reasons for what Carlo calls “violent, racist thuggery” that followed.
Instead, the prime minister promised more AI surveillance. And that, according to Carlo, is “tone deaf in these circumstances.”
“(It) will give the public absolutely no confidence that this government has the competence or conviction to get tough on the causes of these crimes and protect the public,” she concluded.
BOMBSHELL PROOF: Acting Secret Service Director Caught In Massive Perjury
Justice Gorsuch Warns Democrats about Supreme Court Reform
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch warned the Biden administration and Democrats to be careful over plans to reform the Supreme Court.
Gorsuch voiced his feelings on political changes to the Supreme Court in an interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream. The Supreme Court Justice, one of three Trump appointments, said that the Court serves as the last court of appeal for Americans and matters most of all when “the government’s coming after you.”
Gorsuch said he didn’t think it “would be helpful” to comment on specific proposals by the Biden administration, but instead chose to emphasis the vital role of an independent judiciary in American society.
“[An independent judiciary] means that when you’re unpopular, you can get a fair hearing,” he said.
“If you’re in the majority, you don’t need judges and juries to hear you, to protect your rights, if you’re popular. It’s there for the moment when the spotlight’s on you – when the government’s coming after you. And don’t you want a ferociously independent judge and jury of your peers to make those decisions?”
Justice Neil Gorsuch on proposed reforms for the Supreme Court:
“I just say, be careful.”
pic.twitter.com/nXSAfve6JO— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) August 4, 2024
The Supreme Court, with its conservative majority, has been a target of Democrats for some time, especially since the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and, more recently, the decision to uphold the notion of presidential immunity with regard to the 6 January case against former president Donald Trump.
Last Monday, the Biden administration announced a raft of measures targeted specifically at the Supreme Court, including term limits and an enforceable code of ethics. Introducing term limits would require a Constitutional amendment.
The Biden administration also wants to challenge presidential immunity.
“This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights and civil rights to taking away a woman’s right to choose, to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,” Biden said in response to that decision, made at the beginning of last month.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has also vowed to make Supreme Court reform a priority of the next Democrat administration if Kamala Harris wins in November.
“It’s a very big priority,” said Schumer this week in an interview with NBC.
“I feel very strongly for the sake of the republic we need reform in the courts.”
Schumer claimed Republicans have devised a “brilliant but destructive” way of getting the courts to pursue a “hard right” agenda without the support of voters.
“They spent three decades trying to take over the courts,” he said.
“They’ve achieved it.”
BOMBSHELL PROOF: Acting Secret Service Director Caught In Massive Perjury