News

Hawaiians are particularly concerned about the effects of climate change

Almost half of Americans, or 48%, believe they’ll live to see the end of the world, according to a new survey.

5,000 Americans from across the country were interviewed about their beliefs on the effects of climate change.

Hawaii (66%), Vermont (59%) and New Mexico (56%) were the states where respondents were most likely to agree that climate change will destroy the world in their lifetimes.

More than half of respondents in Washington (55%) and Minnesota (54%) also believed they’d witness calamity.

Respondents were also asked whether they believed climate change would have a greater effect on their state rather than others.

Hawaiians were again the most concerned, with 61% agreeing their state would be most affected, followed by Alaskans and Californians.

Nearly two-thirds of all respondents, 65%, said they wished they could do more to be environmentally conscious.

The survey also revealed that 37% of all respondents take environmentally conscious actions because it “helps them feel like a good person.”

---

The Silent Weather War On Humanity

---

The NHS Is facing landmark legal action as female nurses protest at being forced to share the women’s changing room with a biological male olleague. 26 female hospital nurses have complained that their colleague, a […]

The post NHS Sued By Female Nurses Forced to Share Changing Room With Biological Male appeared first on The People’s Voice.

A bombshell report has revealed that Moderna’s Covid ‘vaccine’ was manufactured by a government contractor with close connections to the CIA, FDA and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. According to the report, in 2021 Moderna […]

The post Report: CIA Involved in Manufacturing of Covid ‘Vaccines’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.

A military draft is becoming more likely as conscription system may become automated.

During the Sunday show Alex Jones covered the news that house lawmakers are seeking to automate the Selective Service registration system in preparation for a military draft.

Don’t miss:

Breaking! Tucker Carlson and Erik Prince Expose The Secret Life of Cell Phones

---

Student affluence appears to be a key factor in explaining where protests and encampments took place

The recent wave of Gaza campus protests have been “overwhelmingly an elite college phenomenon,” according to detailed reporting from Washington Monthly.

Using data from Harvard’s Crowd Counting Consortium and news reports, reporters from Washington Monthly looked at 1,421 public and private nonprofit colleges.

The reporters found that 318 of these colleges have had protests and 123 have had encampments, and by using data for Pell Grants (awarded to students from moderate- and low-income families) they then revealed that “pro-Palestinian protests have been rare at colleges with high percentages of Pell students.”

The vast majority of protests and encampments have been at “elite schools with both low acceptance rates and few Pell students.” Colleges with working-class students have, with a few exceptions like Cal State Los Angeles and City College of New York, experienced no protests or encampments.

“When you separate out private and public colleges, the difference becomes even more stark,” the report notes.

“At private colleges, protests have been rare, encampments have been rarer, and both have taken place almost exclusively at schools where poorer students are scarce and the listed tuition and fees are exorbitantly high.”

Even at public colleges, there is a clear relationship between having fewer Pell students and have a protest or encampment.

The analysis presented by Washington Monthly clearly suggests that affluence is a key factor in explaining the incidence of protests and encampments. The reporters suggest poorer students may simply be too burdened by working part-time jobs to take part.

Other factors, such as an institution’s history of public protests and its general political orientation, are likely to play a role too, the report concludes.

---

The Silent Weather War On Humanity

---

X refused to remove or block the offending posts under Queensland’s Anti-Discrimination Act. Elon Musk, the owner of X, argued that his company should be exempt from these laws due to its US-based operations.

Social media giant X has faced a significant legal setback in Australia. The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) has ruled that the company can be held accountable for so-called “hate speech” published on its platform. This landmark decision came in response to a complaint lodged by the Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) in July 2022. AMAN accused X of permitting a “far-right conspiracy group” to post hateful and denigrating comments about Muslims.

Social media companies like X have traditionally argued that they are not responsible for content on their platforms that originates outside the jurisdictions where they do business. However, this ruling ignores that notion, suggesting the platform is responsible for the speech of its users.

Despite AMAN’s requests, X refused to remove or block the offending posts under Queensland’s Anti-Discrimination Act. Elon Musk, the owner of X, argued that his company should be exempt from these laws due to its US-based operations.

Rita Jabri Markwell, AMAN’s legal advisor, countered this defense, asserting that X profits from local markets and communities in Australia by collecting data and selling advertisements. She believes this ruling could set a precedent in other jurisdictions, challenging the long-held legal protections social media companies have relied upon. She emphasized the broader implications, saying, “This could become a precedent that will carry weight in other jurisdictions, whether it’s at the federal level or under other vilification laws.”

The QCAT decision follows a dispute between Australia’s online safety regulator and X over the platform’s refusal to remove video footage of a stabbing incident involving Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in April, which was live-streamed. In Australia, X hid 65 tweets containing the video rather than complying with a takedown order. Although eSafety commissioner Julie Inman won an interim order in the Federal Court, the ban was not made permanent.

AMAN is also awaiting a separate ruling on whether X breached the law by failing to remove or hide the alleged hate speech. Additionally, AMAN has a legal complaint against Meta and Facebook Australia pending before the Human Rights Commission. Meta, like X, has argued against the applicability of Australian law, particularly in the context of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, maintaining that it is not subject to local jurisdiction.

---

Breaking! Tucker Carlson and Erik Prince Expose The Secret Life of Cell Phones

---