Bill Gates Pushing Digital ID in Kenya — Report
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is continuing its digital ID agenda by helping advise Kenya in its rollout of the country’s Maisha Namba, a personal unique identifier tied to biometrics.
Down the road, implantable microchips are expected to be included in the system, although that is not currently part of the program.
MSM branded me a conspiracy theorist when i warned about this in 2020. It’s still seemed outlandish and frightening back then. Now everything has been normalized. We are cattle lined up at the abatoir.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 3, 2024
The digital ID will expand the use of biometrics from fingerprints to iris and facial scans, at least as it currently stands.
India has been collecting all fingerprints, eyeball scans and facial recognition images in their Aadhaar system for years.
Alex Jones has been exposing the dark side of digital ID’s for decades.
“Individuals will be issued a digital ID as a virtual representation of their physical identification documents. The digital ID will not solely rely on fingerprint biometry like the Huduma card but will seek to widen the pool of biometrics in the national identification system to include iris and facial recognition,” Immigration and Citizen Services Principal Secretary Julius Bitok said in 2023, according to news site Kenyans.
Social programs, banking, medical, identification, purchases, birth certificates and other activities of modern society will require the Maisha Namba.
Many see the digital ID as the stepping stone to implantable microchips.
Interestingly, implantable microchips for humans have been trialed for decades. In 2004 the FDA approved the now-defunct VeriChip implant, a microchip the size of a grain of rice billed as ‘the future of patient identification‘ and ‘the future of emergency medicine‘.
Alex Jones specifically exposed the VeriChip in 2002, Jones was at the forefront of exposing the implantable microchip craze of the early 2000s.
The VeriChip’s eventual demise likely stemmed from the public’s opposition to being microchipped for ethical and privacy reasons.
“The VeriChip is injected under the skin of the upper arm or hip in an outpatient procedure,” Wired Magazine said in 2003. “A special scanner reads the RF signal emitted by the microchip to obtain the device’s ID number, which then is entered into a database to access personal data about the individual. Other potential uses of the chip, according to company officials, include scanning unconscious patients to obtain their medical records or restricting access to high-security buildings by scanning workers to verify their clearance.”
“Health Link is the connection between you and your personal health record. Health Link utilizes a tiny, passive microchip (the nation’s first and only microchip cleared for patient identification by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration) and a secure, private online database that links you to your personal health record. Your Health Link is always with you and cannot be lost or stolen. It provides emergency room doctors and nurses with your vital medical and emergency contact information, allowing them to treat you rapidly, accurately and safely during an emergency,” the VeriChip Corporation said on their website. “About the size of a grain of rice, the microchip is inserted just under the skin and contains only a unique, 16-digit identifier. The microchip itself does not contain any other data other than this unique electronic ID, nor does it contain any Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking capabilities. And unlike conventional forms of identification, the Health Link cannot be lost, stolen, misplaced, or counterfeited. It is safe, secure, reversible, and always with you.”
https://www.chipsetc.com/verichip—the-rise-and-fall-of-the-human-implant-microchip.html
Outside of the medical setting the VeriChip was made trendy with one nightclub microchipping it’s partygoers.
Patients of 16 regional hospitals in the Greater Palm Beach, Florida area along with Mexican government officials and a Florida family also received the chips during its heyday, among others. The Atlantic reported that you too will likely receive a chip, ‘someday’.
A military member once called into The Alex Jones Show and reported that he was microchipped.
In 2006 a study was published documenting the VeriChip’s vulnerabilities as well as research the team conducted on the chips.
“The VeriChip™ is a Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tag produced commercially for implantation in human beings. Its proposed uses include identification of medical patients, physical access control, contactless retail payment, and even the tracing of kidnapping victims. As the authors explain, the VeriChip is vulnerable to simple, over-the-air spoofing attacks. In particular, an attacker capable of scanning a VeriChip, eavesdropping on its signal, or simply learning its serial number can create a spoof device whose radio appearance is indistinguishable from the original. We explore the practical implications of this security vulnerability,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “The authors argue that: 1 The VeriChip should serve exclusively for identification, and not authentication or access control. 2 Paradoxically, for bearer safety, a VeriChip should be easy to spoof; an attacker then has less incentive to coerce victims or extract VeriChips from victims’ bodies.”
Same Line, Different Accent — Transracial Kamala Harris ‘The Ethnic Chameleon’
Kamala Harris continues her cringe tour while adjusting her accent to appeal to the local demographics in what many consider to be a disgusting display of pandering to her low-information voter base.
While speaking in Detroit, Michigan, a city that is 77.8 percent black, Harris, who is not black, did her best to speak like a black person. While speaking in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a city that is only 23.2 percent black, Harris reverted back to her natural way of speaking.
The recent multiple personalities that Harris put on is not new to her, as she has been speaking as a black person off and on throughout her recent campaign.
‘Kamala the chameleon’ is likely pretending to be black to garner the black vote, however Infowars recently reported that Harris is not accepted by black Bronx voters and that blacks are likely to vote for Trump as he gave them a stimulus check, according to Don Lemon.
NEWSMAX Correspondent Cara Castronuova took to the streets of The Bronx, New York to find out if Black and Hispanic voters are influenced by identity politics.@CaraCastronuova pic.twitter.com/49UtLvRSc7
— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) August 8, 2024
Harris is actually Indian, while Senator Elizabeth Warren, a white woman, pretends to be Indian.
Harris is likely taking after Joe Biden, as those who didn’t vote for Biden ‘ain’t black‘, according to Biden.
“If you don’t vote for me then you ain’t black.” pic.twitter.com/3twHC93O6B
— CMM (Corrupt Mainstream Media) (@CorruptMM) July 16, 2024
Similar to their affirmation of transgenderism, transracialism is a trait that is also deeply rooted in the Democrat party.
People Are Controlled By Identity Politics: #AlexWasRight
Ex-Trump Intel Official Says Deep State Paid Out Nearly $2 Million To Disgraced FBI Lovers Strzok & Page Over Release Of Anti-Trump Texts
Donald Trump’s former Deputy Director of National Intelligence Kash Patel joined the “Shawn Ryan Show” this week for a lengthy discussion about the Deep State, the collapsing Democratic Party, the 2024 presidential election and much more.
During one portion of the conversation being shared online, Patel mentioned ex-FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, who were infamously caught having an affair and sharing anti-Donald Trump texts while essentially running the “Russiagate” investigation into the then-President.
Patel pointed out the duo received almost $2 million in a settlement with the DOJ last week after suing the government for releasing their messages to the public.
“The Deep State came full-circle and gave these guys a payday for rigging the presidential election and breaking the law,” he said.
Holy Shyt‼️
🚨 Former FBI Officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page Received $1.5 MILLION Dollars for “the Improper Disclosure of their Text Messages” Discussing a Coup to Remove the President of the United States
• What the deep state uses most to cover up their corruption is an… pic.twitter.com/v6ymg3xJjF— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 3, 2024
“They were running the Russiagate investigation against Trump, they were the head of the counterintelligence unit at the FBI and they’re having an extramarital affair together. They’re sending each other texts about how much they hate Trump and are gonna create an insurance policy to stop Trump,” Patel explained.
“Then, we finally find those text messages and you know what the FBI and DOJ do for like a year? Redact them to congressional investigators and congressional men and women running the oversight of their agency. That’s just one example.”
He noted that Strzok and Page received the $1.5 million payout last week despite the fact that the pair “broke the law, broke the chain of command, broke every regulation there is at the FBI,” and “weaponized the system of justice against a political target they hated.”
“We found those text messages and we got them declassified finally in full when I became Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and the world has now seen them and can read them,” Patel said. “That’s the best form of transparency. That’s why I want this 24/7 declassification office. Don’t have me regurgitate it to you, read it. Get the documents, get the files, get the memos.”
Check out the full interview below:
Watch Live: Americans Increasingly Fed Up With Illegal Immigration As Foreign Gangs Commit Violent Crimes
“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.
Also, don’t forget to follow “The American Journal” on X for highlights from this exclusive Infowars program and other informational content.
Distrust in Vaccines Grows Among US Adults, Survey Shows
U.S. Americans’ trust in vaccines — especially COVID-19 vaccines — has dropped, according to a survey conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
The survey results detail the most recent wave of responses — collected in July — from a nationally representative sample of 1,496 adults, most of whom have been routinely surveyed in the project since April 2021. Roughly 100 of the adults were added after 2021 due to attrition of the survey’s initial participants.
In addition to showing an overall decline in willingness to vaccinate, the results showed what an Annenberg Public Policy Center press release called a “greater acceptance of Covid vaccine misinformation.”
The survey results follow on the heels of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval last week of updated COVID-19 boosters for ages 6 months and up.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Ph.D., who directs the Annenberg Public Policy Center and leads its survey efforts, said in the press release, “With the CDC reporting that COVID-19 infection remains an ongoing threat and an updated vaccine available, now is the time to ramp up awareness both of the value of vaccinating against COVID-19 and of the risks of contracting the disease.”
The survey report did not define “misinformation” but described it in passing as a “science-inconsistent response.”
The Annenberg Public Policy Center did not immediately respond when The Defender asked for a clearer definition.
‘Incorrect’ to believe COVID vaccines caused thousands of deaths
The survey findings reveal that, as of July, more than a quarter of U.S. adults (28%) — up from 22% in June 2021 — “incorrectly” believe that the COVID-19 vaccines have been responsible for thousands of deaths, according to the report’s authors.
“The percentage who know this is false,” they added, “declined to 55% from 66%.”
The number of U.S. adults who believe the “false idea” that it’s safer to get a COVID-19 infection than to get the vaccine more than doubled (now 22%) since April 2021 (10%).
The percentage of U.S. adults who “incorrectly” think the COVID-19 vaccine changes people’s DNA rose from 8% in April 2021 to 15% in July 2024.
Jamieson said, “Belief in these three misconceptions is associated with increased reluctance to vaccinate.”
The Defender asked Jamieson for her thoughts on how to foster an effective dialogue between those, such as herself, who are concerned about vaccine “misinformation” and those who have suffered a vaccine injury or whose loved ones were vaccine-injured.
She did not respond by our publication deadline.
Few people remain worried about COVID infections
According to the Annenberg Public Policy Center’s press release, its survey results also showed:
- Relatively few are worried: Only 1 in 5 people (20%, July 2024) are somewhat or very worried they or someone in their family will contract COVID, down from 25% in February 2024 and 35% in October 2023.
- Decreased interest: Under half of those surveyed (44%) said in February 2024 they are “somewhat likely” or “very likely” to get a yearly COVID-19 vaccine if it is recommended by the CDC, down from 52% in June 2023.
- Benefits vs. risks: Two-thirds of Americans (66% in July 2024) say the benefits of taking COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the risks — but that is lower than the percentage who say the benefits outweigh the risks for the mpox vaccine (70% in July 2024), RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccine for adults 60 and older (74% in October 2023), and MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine (89% in August 2023).
- Covid-19 vaccines seen as less safe and effective than others: As of [the] October 2023 survey, fewer people regard COVID-19 vaccines as safe (66%) and effective (65%) than a variety of other vaccines: MMR (81% safe, 83% effective); flu (81% safe, 75% effective); shingles (78% safe, 73% effective) or pneumonia (74% safe, 69% effective).
- A hypothetical trivalent vaccine: In July 2024, less than half of those surveyed (49%) would be likely to take a combined single-shot mRNA vaccine to protect against flu, RSV, and COVID-19 if one existed and the CDC recommended it. At the same time, 27% say they would be “not at all likely” to take such a single-shot mRNA vaccine.
Nearly 1 in 3 doubt effectiveness of HPV vaccine
According to the survey, U.S. adults are skeptical about other vaccines, not just the COVID-19 shots.
Roughly a third (32%) of U.S. adults said they were unsure of the effectiveness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
Additionally, 23% were uncertain about the pneumonia vaccine, 19% doubted the shingles vaccine, and 47% were unsure about the RSV vaccine during pregnancy or at age 60 and older (37%).
The survey did not appear to report public perceptions of these vaccines’ safety profile. However, the authors did report that public perception of both the safety and effectiveness of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine dropped to 81% and 83%, respectively, from 2023 when 88% said it was somewhat or very safe, and 87% said it was somewhat or very effective.
The Annenberg Public Policy Center, established in 1993, educates the public and policymakers about communication’s role in advancing public understanding of political, science, and health issues at the local, state, and federal levels.
Its ongoing survey is funded by an endowment established by the Annenberg Foundation.
Doctors Quit British Medical Association Over It’s Support Of Puberty Blockers For Trans Kids
Hundreds of doctors in the UK are resigning from the British Medical Association in revolt against the unions opposition to a ban on puberty blockers for kids according to reports in The Times and The […]
The post Doctors Quit British Medical Association Over It’s Support Of Puberty Blockers For Trans Kids appeared first on The People’s Voice.