Chinese Agents Allegedly Used Illegal Tactics to Threaten Canadians in 2021 Election, Documents Show
OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews) – A memo recently disclosed by a commission looking into foreign interference in Canada’s last two elections shows federal officials knew agents of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) were using illegal methods to threaten Canadian voters.
The information was disclosed from a memo dated August 29, 2023, from a Department of Foreign Affairs meeting, as disclosed by the Commission on Foreign Interference. The meeting acknowledging threats to Canadians via foreign state actors came only weeks after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s special rapporteur tasked with looking into the matter downplayed such interference as “media allegations.”
“The RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) is aware foreign actor threats and interference are being carried out in Canada, including the harassment of individuals or groups exercising their fundamental freedoms guaranteed in the Charter,” reads the memo, as noted by Blacklock’s Reporter.
“Combating and investigating foreign actor interference remains an operational priority for the RCMP,” it said.
According to the memo, the government claimed that it takes “its responsibility to protect Canadians from foreign interference seriously.”
The Commission on Foreign Interference is headed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue, who had earlier said she and her lawyers will remain “impartial” and will not be influenced by politics. In January, Hogue said that she would “uncover the truth whatever it may be.”
The commission was struck after Trudeau’s special rapporteur, former Governor General David Johnston, failed in an investigation into CCP allegations last year after much delay. That inquiry was not done in public and was headed by Johnston, who is a “family friend” of Trudeau.
Johnston quit as “special rapporteur” after a public outcry following his conclusion that there should not be a public inquiry into the matter. Conservative MPs demanded Johnston be replaced over his ties to both China and the Trudeau family.
The potential meddling in Canada’s elections by agents of the CCP has many Canadians worried as well.
The news that federal executives knew that CCP agents had used illegal tactics on Canadians comes just after LifeSiteNews on Monday reported on another subject of interest involving the CCP.
As reported by LifeSiteNews, documents from a federal inquiry looking at meddling in Canada’s past two elections by foreign state actors show CCP agents allegedly worked as Elections Canada poll workers in the 2021 campaign.
As for Trudeau, he has praised China for its “basic dictatorship” and has labeled the authoritarian nation as his favorite country other than his own.
Thus far, the Commission has revealed that there were 13 electoral ridings with suspicious activity. The Commission is currently on break and will resume regular hearings in September.
BREAKING VIDEO: Democrats Now Giving 150K to Illegal Aliens at The Expense of Veterans & The Elderly
On the Tuesday show Alex Jones covered how California Democrats are giving massive amounts of money to illegal aliens to own homes while veterans and elderly are going homeless.
Don’t miss:
Arizona Sex Offender Who Threatened to Kill Donald Trump During His Border Visit Now in Custody
The office of the sheriff of Cochise County, Arizona has disclosed that a registered sex offender who allegedly threatened to assassinate former President Donald Trump during his visit to the southern border is now under custody.
On Aug. 22, the Daily Mail reported that Ronald Lee Syvrud, 66, allegedly made unspecified threats against Trump on two social media posts on Aug. 21 and 22. The report also stated that the planned assassination attempt was intended for his trip to the border in Sierra Vista.
Sheriff Mark Dannels stated that the nature of the threat remains unclear but clarified that they have “zero tolerance for any kind of threats or intents of violence.”
“We have zero tolerance for any kind of threats or intents of violence, so we’ll find him. He’ll go to jail,” Dannels said in a statement posted on social media. “He’s a registered sex offender here in Cochise County, and we were looking for him. He’s out of compliance as part of his violations. So we’re looking for him on that. We’re going to arrest him on that. But also the fact his pulse was obviously directed toward this event. So we want to talk to him about that.”
After a thorough investigation, Syvrud was arrested that same day.
“As part of the operations plan in place for the visit of candidate Donald Trump on today’s date, locating this subject was a priority. Intelligence developed led to a possible location in the St. David area and multiple units deployed to the location. At approximately 2:16 pm, units on the scene observed the suspect traveling outside of the identified location, and a felony stop was conducted. Syvrud was taken into custody without further incident at approximately 2:30 pm,” Dannels posted on the official Facebook page of Cochise County Sheriff’s Office.
The sheriff’s office booked Syvrud into the Cochise County Jail on “a felony warrant from Graham County for Failure to Register as a Sex Offender and two counts of threatening for this case.” Dannels also added in his post that “Syvrud remains in custody pending further court adjudication.”
Trump shrugs off new death threat
The social media threat came only six weeks after the failed assassination attempt against the former president during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
In a conversation with the Daily Mail reporter, Trump admitted that he had not heard about the threat, likely because law enforcement wanted to keep it from him. However, he was still informed about a potential threat against him during a visit to the border wall.
“What are your thoughts coming down here? Some people told me it’s dangerous for you to be here,” Trump stated. “I heard it’s dangerous, but I also have a job to do. I heard it’s very dangerous. I haven’t heard about that. They probably want to keep it from me.”
He joked about leaving immediately upon hearing the news but maintained that he had a job to do despite the dangers. “Thank you for telling me, let’s get out of here right now. No, thank you very much for saying, but no,” he added.
He even expressed his respect for the Secret Service in line with the previous attempt on his life.
“And I have great respect for Secret Service, the job they do, including a month and a half ago, when they were jumping on top of me with bullets flying right at them. So, mistakes were made, and they’re going to learn from the mistakes. But I have great respect.”
Trump.news has more stories about the failed assassination attempt and other death threats on the former president.
VIDEO: Alex Jones says Donald Trump is Wrong About Nuclear Power Being the Answer to America’s Energy Needs
On the Tuesday show Alex Jones broke down dangers of nuclear energy due to sub-par reactor designs, corporate mismanagement and the competency crisis.
On top of those dangers, there’s the threat of meltdown in a solar flare EMP when their spent fuel pool’s cooling systems fail, the reactors being blown up in a Democrat-instigated war or future terrorists accessing the spent fuel waste for dirty bombs.
Or the threat of solar flares to nuclear reactor backup cooling systems. pic.twitter.com/wuemRBSh7P
— Sean Seraphim Alexander Miller (@IWArchivist) August 27, 2024
Don’t miss:
Alex Jones Exposes THE EMP DEATH OF HUMANITY
Public-Private Partnerships! Government & Private Groups Still Collude to Target Election ‘Misinformation’
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) – a part of the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – has been enlisting private entities to help achieve one of its goals.
According to CISA, it would be to combat election misinformation and secure “election infrastructure” – while according to critics, it is to continue with the mission of censoring lawful speech “disfavored” by the current authorities seeking to remain where they are after November – by hook or crook.
CISA doesn’t feel the need to hide this activity that has been taking place since 2018 through a program called the Election Infrastructure Subsector Coordinating Council (SCC). It is here that US government entities – federal, state, and local – meet private groups (“partners” as CISA calls them).
We obtained the latest document for you here.
What’s coordinated here, according to the agency, and as was reported by The Federalist, is the reduction of “cyber, physical, and operational security risks to election infrastructure.” The coordination is done to the point where government and private sector have adopted “a unified approach.”
Information sharing ahead of the presidential election is also happening as SCC works with the Government Coordinating Council (GCC).
According to CISA, this collaboration is now “unprecedented” while what is referred to as “private sector owners and operators” sit, as part of SCC, in meetings with the FBI and election officials.
But CISA has other partners – the Election Integrity Project (EIP), formed months before the 2020 election, which has been blasted by the House Judiciary Committee as a tool for the government to bypass the First Amendment and censor speech.
The CISA site has a document, “Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation: Planning and Incident Response Guide for Election Officials,” put together by CISA/GCC Joint Mis/Disinformation Working Group.
In it, CISA “defines” what each of its targets is supposed to be, and ends up doing what all “misinformation warriors” do – offer subjective and broad descriptions susceptible to interpretation, instead of clear definitions.
For example, “malinformation” is said to be information “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”
The document mentions “delegitimization of election results” as one form of mis, dis, and mal information.
It’s unclear if CISA has both 2016 and 2020 elections in mind – or only one – but this is how the activity is described: “Narratives or content that delegitimizes election results or sows distrust in the integrity of the process based on false or misleading claims.”
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Laments Decline in Big Tech Collaboration Since 2016
Participants in the Democratic National Convention (DNC) were comfortable speaking publicly about what Congress is investigating as conduct that eventually (after the 2020 ballot) turned into government-Big Tech collusion.
And they are doing this by reminiscing about “the good old days” after the 2016 election when major social platforms panicked and got cowed into “working” with Democrats.
“Election integrity” is how supporters of the practice frame the concern that was and is being addressed as platforms have their “calls” with officials.
A University of Southern California Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism panel heard that there is more “deceptive” content and “manipulating voter sentiment” than ever – and yet social media companies are “sharply downsizing election integrity departments,” as one report about the event put it.
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chief information security officer Jude Meche shared that the relationship with these companies is now allegedly not what it used to be.
“Following the 2016 election, we had calls with X and with Meta all the time. They were working with us. That no longer exists, that all faded quickly. We don’t have counterparts in these companies anymore,” said Meche, whose committee’s job is specifically to get Democrat candidates elected to the US Senate.
What happened in 2016, of course, was Donald Trump’s victory. Professor of ethics and finance at New York University Michael Posner cautioned the panel that “we’re back to 2016.”
Posner was referring to social media companies backtracking on their promises to increase “content moderation” made in the wake of that election and accused, or perhaps warned them, that they have been allowed to act “with impunity” since.
But, the Twitter Files, for example, say that those who have been acting with impunity during that time are actually Democrats, and their administration since 2020.
Posner is concerned about the number of people companies like X and Meta these days employ to police and censor speech (election integrity and content moderation are what he calls it) – compared to 2016, when “there was a sense that something had to be done.”
If this DNC panel is anything to go by, there is once again “a sense that something has to be done” among Democrats – but roping in social platforms, particularly, it seems, X, to “cooperate” is now a very different proposition compared to what was doable only a few years ago.