mRNA Bird Flu Vaccine in Development
The academic medical center Penn Medicine News issued a press release on Thursday reporting that researchers have published a study documenting their work in creating an mRNA-technology-based vaccination for the upcoming avian influenza pandemic which is set to begin soon.
While it is unclear from the literature if humans or animals will be the recipient of the new exotic injections, both humans and animals are discussed in the research as well as human pandemics such as the 2009 Swine Flu and the 2020 Fauci Flu being cited as reasons to rejoice the new mRNA technology, indicating that this ‘flavor’ of vaccine may possibly be given to both humans and the farm animals they consume.
“Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses from H5 clade 2.3.4.4b are circulating at unprecedentedly high levels in wild and domestic birds and have the potential to adapt to humans. Here, we generate an mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccine encoding the hemagglutinin (HA) glycoprotein from a clade 2.3.4.4b H5 isolate,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section.
The fact that researchers claim the bird flu infects various types of animals and also transfers to humans indicates that this vaccine may possibly be injected into anything that moves.
“There have also been occasional human infections and increasing incidences of clade 2.3.4.4b H5 virus spillover into mammals such as cows, red foxes, seals, and minks14,15,16,17,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.
The researchers discussed their gene therapy work in a medical study they conducted, published Thursday.
“mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines would be useful during an influenza virus pandemic since they can be produced rapidly and do not require the generation of egg-adapted vaccine seed stocks,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section.
The researchers injected the exotic mRNA technology into mice, ferrets, pheasants and foxes, as described in the paper’s ‘Results’ and ‘Introduction’ sections. The substance did illicit an immune response in the animals, making the researchers deem the vaccine to be a success.
In order to conduct the experiment, some animals were injected with mRNA liquid coded for bird flu (H5), some were injected with a traditional H5 inactivated virus vaccine, and others were injected with mRNA liquid coded for the proverbial ‘morning star protein’ or ‘Lucifer’s protein’ aka ‘Satan’s protein’ — called Luciferase.
“Animals were primed with 60 μg of mRNA-LNP vaccine encoding H5 or an irrelevant protein (Luciferase) and then boosted 28 days later with the same vaccine,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section. “…we found that the vaccine elicited antibodies that bound to a ‘headless’ H5 stalk (Fig. 6E, F).”
While a previous mRNA vaccine ended up giving all animals it was tested on a terminal lung disease when they encountered the natural virus, killing them, this new one did not kill all the animals.
“All of the vaccinated animals in our study survived, whereas all of the unvaccinated animals died following the H5N1 challenge,” the study said in the ‘Discussion’ section.
One professor who’s quoted in the press release discussed how mRNA vaccines can be created in just hours for new pandemics as they arise.
“The mRNA technology allows us to be much more agile in developing vaccines; we can start creating a mRNA vaccine within hours of sequencing a new viral strain with pandemic potential,” said Scott Hensley, PhD, a professor of Microbiology at the Perelman School of Medicine. “During previous influenza pandemics, like the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, vaccines were difficult to manufacture and did not become available until after the initial pandemic waves subsided.”
Notably, the first mRNA based gene therapy injection to be given to the general public was the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccinations, which have garnered much criticism.
The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses, increase Covid infection rates, result in turbo cancers, reproductive destruction, cause miscarriages, paralyzation, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, as well as likely permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring.
In the U.S. the CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.
It is possible that the 2024 election-year pandemic will elicit a gene therapy injection or two just as the 2020 election-year pandemic did.
Globalists May Release New Bird Flu Strain In Attempt To Stop Trump, Warns Edward Dowd
Deadly Ebola-Like Bleeding Virus Is ‘Surging Through Europe’
A potentially deadly virus that can jump from animals to humans is already sweeping through northern Europe putting the UK highly at risk, according to reports. According to new research, the deadly virus which is […]
The post Deadly Ebola-Like Bleeding Virus Is ‘Surging Through Europe’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Israeli Embassy In Mexico City Set On Fire By Protesters
Demonstrators upset with the ongoing Israeli bombardment of Gaza clashed with police and tried setting Mexico City’s Israeli Embassy on fire this week.
Mexican leftists torch the Israeli embassy in Mexico City as police are ordered to stand down. pic.twitter.com/ljWFBIsniJ
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 29, 2024
A violent pro-Hamas demonstration involving hundreds of people outside the Israeli embassy in Mexico City, overnight. The aggressors tried to break through fences, threw grenades of various kinds and Molotov cocktails, and attempted to set the embassy on fire.
— ?ℎ???????? (@chiIIum) May 29, 2024
At least six… pic.twitter.com/OlOjmwgmYC
“It’s not a war, it’s a genocide,” the protester chanted outside the embassy.
Protesters in solidarity with Palestine set a fire & throw rocks in front of the Israeli Embassy in Mexico City. Demonstrators chant, “It’s not a war, it’s a genocide!” We are demanding an immediate & permanent ceasefire! ✊??❤️??? pic.twitter.com/hvMPuQlqJX
— Voices in Movement (@VIM_Media) May 29, 2024
According to the Associated Press, six police officers were injured during clashes with the angry demonstrators who tore down poles to use as weapons and threw objects at the cops.
The protest was launched in response to a Sunday Israeli attack on a refugee camp near Rafah that reportedly killed 45 people, according to Palestine’s numbers.
How US is Flirting With Idea of ‘Limited’ Nuclear Conflict With Russia and China
Washington is considering the deployment of nuclear-armed cruise missiles on Virginia-class attack submarines to deter China and Russia, according to the Asia Times.
US lawmakers have recently focused on how to modify Virginia-class attack submarines (SSN) to install nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles (SLCM-N). Last week they summoned Vice Adm. Johnny Wolfe to discuss the complexities and uncertainties concerning arming attack submarines with SLCM-N. The discussion revolved around enhancing their nuclear deterrence against China and Russia, according to the Asia Times.
The SLCM-N is a cruise missile with a low-yield nuclear warhead launched from surface ships or attack submarines (SSNs). It was first proposed in 2018 alongside the low-yield version (with less than 10 kilotons of explosive power) of the W76 warhead to arm long-range ballistic missile submarines.
Ukraine used Western weapons ‘on several occasions’ to strike Russia – report
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) May 29, 2024
Kiev failed to notify Berlin of its use of a German-supplied Patriot air defense system “at least once to take action” against Russian targets, according to the German newspaper Bild.
The strike was… pic.twitter.com/x3SgCSyaau
What are the SLCM-N program’s merits in the eyes of American lawmakers, military, and scholars?
First of all, US military experts argue that SLCM-Ns would allow the US to engage in a “limited” nuclear exchange in contrast to “massive retaliation“.
“If conflict crosses the nuclear threshold, lower yields would signal a clear interest in limiting its intensity,” wrote Lieutenant Commander Alan Cummings, US Navy Reserve, for US Naval Institute in April 2024.
In addition, using theater-based nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles might not be seen as “legitimizing” a nuclear retaliatory strike on the American homeland, according to US military experts. They suggest that it would make it hard for American adversaries to immediately identify the origin of the strike after an attack.
Placing SLCM-Ns on US attack submarines will allow the Pentagon to maintain a widespread and enduring presence in the North Atlantic, Arctic Ocean, and Asia-Pacific, according to Kyle Balzer of the American Enterprise Institute.
“Due to the low observability of undersea launchers, Beijing and Moscow will have to assume it is loitering on site,” wrote Balzer for Breaking Defense on February 28. “If deployed on select surface ships, as well as submarines, the deterrent effect could be even greater.”
Balzer pointed out that the deployment of SLCM-Ns on attack subs and surface ships would create an atmosphere of ambiguity: Russia and China wouldn’t be sure if the vessels are nuclear-armed or not, thus complicating decision-making and creating additional deterrence.
“China and Russia would have to assume SLCM-N’s presence — whether or not it is deployed, in great numbers, to forward areas. In this sense, there is considerable deterrence value and cost-effectiveness in ambiguity,” argued the scholar.
American lawmakers have been pushing ahead with the program for the last several years. While the United States has not deployed a nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile since 1991, the Trump administration argued in 2018 that the SLCM-N would “provide a needed non-strategic regional presence” in Europe and Asia and contribute “to deterrence and assurance of allies, especially in Asia.”
The SLCM-N program was reversed by President Joe Biden in 2022 as an excessive and costly solution. Nonetheless, after a heated debate, the initiative was passed within the framework of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 under the pretext of Russia’s special military operation and China’s alleged plans to “invade” Taiwan. It became law in December 2023 with instructions to achieve operational capability of the SLCM-N by 2034.
Is ‘Limited’ Nuclear Conflict Possible?
Russia has repeatedly warned the US against lowering the nuclear threshold and hypothesizing a possibility of a limited nuclear exchange. According to Moscow, the “limited” use of nuclear weapons by no means reduces the risk of an all-out nuclear war, but rather invites it.
“Those who like to theorize about the flexibility of American nuclear potential must understand that in line with the Russian military doctrine such actions are seen as warranting retaliatory use of nuclear weapons by Russia,” Zakharova said.
In May, the Russian Foreign Ministry warned NATO against delivering F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine, given that the war planes could carry low-yield nuclear B61-12 bombs. Moscow said it will treat F-16s in Ukraine as nuclear-capable weapon systems, regardless of their model, and will consider their deployment a deliberate provocation.
China has also repeatedly lambasted Washington for switching to low-yield nuclear arms as a return to the Cold War era. Beijing also raised the alarm over AUKUS (Australia, UK and US pact) plans to build nuclear-powered submarines in Australia as violating non-proliferation principles. Both Russia and China pursue a no-first-use nuclear doctrine.
Trump Is Going To Win In A Landslide: Must Watch Alex Jones / Steve Bannon Interview
EU State Permits Kiev to Strike Inside Russia Using its Arms
Poland has no objections to Ukraine using Western weapons, including those provided by Warsaw, to strike targets deep within Russian territory, Polish Deputy Defense Minister Cezary Tomczyk has said.
His comments come as Kiev’s Western backers have been debating whether or not their donated long-range weapons could be used to strike Russia. Some have argued that there should be no ban on such a use of Western munitions while others, notably the US, have stressed that the restriction is necessary to prevent an escalation of the conflict.
Speaking to Radio ZET on Wednesday, Poland’s Tomczyk stressed that “there are no such restrictions on the Polish weapons supplied to Ukraine,” and argued that other Western countries should also lift their limitations on use of the weapons they’ve contributed.
Last week, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg also insisted that bloc members should allow Kiev to use their weapons to attack deeper into Russia, arguing that maintaining such a ban amounted to denying Ukraine the ability to defend itself.
Latvian President Edgars Rinkevics has also agreed with lifting the restriction on where to fire the weapons provided, stating that there is “no rational pragmatic reason not to allow Ukraine to use those weapons against Russia in a way that is the most efficient.”
Moscow has vehemently condemned the possibility of Western weapons being used against Russia, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov arguing that NATO’s Stoltenberg had exceeded his authority in calling for the lifting of the ban.
Read more Ukraine striking targets deep inside Russia with Western weapons – AFP
Russian President Vladimir Putin has also stressed that Kiev’s foreign backers should be aware that long-range strikes on Russia using Western weaponry would represent a serious escalation of the conflict.
“This constant escalation can lead to serious consequences. If these serious consequences occur in Europe, how will the US behave, bearing in mind our parity in the field of strategic weapons? Hard to say. Do they want global conflict?” Putin said on Tuesday.
Some NATO members have also rebuked calls for more strikes on targets in Russia, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni urging Stoltenberg to be “very careful” with such statements.
Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini has also stated that “NATO cannot force us to kill in Russia,” arguing that Rome is giving Ukraine weapons only to defend itself, not to “fight, strike and kill outside its territory.”
Trump Is Going To Win In A Landslide: Must Watch Alex Jones / Steve Bannon Interview
The American Journal: Jury Deliberations Commence In Donald Trump ‘Hush Money’ Trial
“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.
Follow The American Journal on Telegram: