News

8-point plan lays out the Democrats’ plot to take over America.

A 2-minute video succinctly explains how the Democrats plan to establish single-party dominance by opening America’s borders to the entire world.

The video, created by X user Western Lensman, lays out the Democrtats’ 8-point plan of attack to destroy America and bring it under their permanent rule — all while using your taxpayer dollars.

WATCH: The Democrat Open Borders Plan to Entrench Single-Party Rule | Explained in Under Two Minutes pic.twitter.com/uWJxBiKive

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) March 19, 2024

Lensman explains:

1. flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world — enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual U.S. states, so far.
2. prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of the American citizen, with free flights, busses, hotels, meals and phones — ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them.
3. keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals, as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist.
4. ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as a population magnet, codify their permanent status and ensure non-cooperation with ICE.
5. count the non-citizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives — as of now, that would equal thirteen extra congressional districts; a tremendous amount of electoral power.
6. wage a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots, no signature verification, and no proof of citizenship requirements — making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud.
7. lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party.
8. win elections.
9. entrenched single-party rule has been achieved.

Share this powerful video with your friends and family to expose the Democrat plot to take over America.

---

Top Democrat legal scholars echoing same narrative

Former U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic, current Brookings Institute Sr. Fellow and CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen wrote an article published by the leftist outlet Slate this week that detailed how Special Counsel Jack Smith may try to remove Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon from the ongoing Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

Eisen also posted a lengthy thread on X detailing his issues with how Cannon is dealing with jury instructions regarding the Presidential Records Act.

He wrote, “Cannon seems inclined to push the case to trial but is basically asking if she can stack the deck so Trump wins. It’s clumsy & amateurish—seems to know she’s wobbly & she’s asking the parties for help with threshold things that are normally figured out by the judge.”

Cannon seems inclined to push the case to trial but is basically asking if she can stack the deck so Trump wins

It’s clumsy & amateurish—seems to know she’s wobbly & she’s asking the parties for help with threshold things that are normally figured out by the judge 8/x

— Norm Eisen (norm.eisen on Threads) (@NormEisen) March 18, 2024

Continuing, Eisen claimed, “If she persists in this course, special counsel Jack Smith can & will go to the 11th Circuit. And while he is there, this & several other recent (threatened) blunders give him ammo to have her reversed & removed.”

If she persists in this course, special counsel Jack Smith can & will go to the 11th Circuit

And while he is there, this & several other recent (threatened) blunders give him ammo to have her reversed & removed

FIN/ https://t.co/f1N9iy5Z0Y

— Norm Eisen (norm.eisen on Threads) (@NormEisen) March 18, 2024

In the Slate article, Eisen and his co-author attorney Joshua Kolb attacked Cannon as “by far the worst of the jurists overseeing” any of the four ongoing Trump cases.

The pair explained Jack Smith “appears to be preparing to ask” the 11th Circuit Court to overturn “at least one and possibly two of her decisions.”

They added, “In our view, while he is there on those other issues, he should also petition them to remove her from the case.”

Continuing, the article alleged Cannon is “twisting the law to help Trump” by unsealing the identities of two dozen potential witnesses in the case.

Eisen and Kolb accused the judge of having a “pro-Trump bias” because in their opinion her decisions have “unduly” favored the 45th President.

According to the authors, Cannon is “interfering with the ability of other courts overseeing the Trump prosecutions” and “freezing other courts with Trump prosecutions from scheduling a trial” by waiting until May to hold the trial.

“It is almost as if she is intentionally running interference for the former president,” they boldly stated.

Advocating for Smith to remove Cannon, the piece concluded, “At a certain point, the government cannot acquiesce to unfair and dangerous rulings—and it may need to take bold action to protect the integrity of its prosecution.”

As a CNN legal analyst and ex-U.S. diplomat, Eisen’s recommendation shouldn’t be taken lightly as he may even be indirectly providing Smith with an outline for action.

MSNBC legal analyst Glenn Kirschner, and leftist attorneys Laurence Tribe and George Conway also parroted the idea of recusing Cannon.

Co-host of MSNBC‘s “Prosecuting Donald Trump” podcast, Andrew Weissmann, pushed for Cannon’s removal, writing, “This is the kind of legal inanity that could lead Jack Smith to seek to mandamus Judge Cannon- ie to get the 11th Circuit appeals court to hear this and reverse her for the third time- which could also be the proverbial three strikes and you’re out.”

The left’s anti-Trump battle plan is being publicly revealed by the lawyers who are weaponizing the judicial system to subvert the will of American voters.

---

---

“The Deep State is hard at work making America great. Just because we don’t know about it, doesn’t make it suspicious,” outlet claims.

The New York Times is at it again, defending the very bureaucratic institutions it’s mandated to hold to account.

In a bizarre flex, the New York Times on Tuesday published a video report titled, “It Turns Out, The Deep State Is Actually Kind of Awesome,” claiming that the shadowy unelected bureaucracy running various government agencies are the “unsung heroes who make our country great.”

You can’t make this up — but apparently the Times can.

The NYT begins by saying, “Donald Trump is obsessed with the Deep State.”

In a classic straw man fallacy, it goes on to portray the “Deep State” as a group of nerdy, innocent and well-to-do government workers performing important functions for humanity, like working at NASA sending satellites into space, decontaminating water for the Environmental Protection Agency or ensuring safe workplaces for the Department of Labor.

“You want to replace your own water pipes? You got the skills to launch an asteroid-deflecting spacecraft? No,” says the NYT’s Adam Westbrook.

“Important work like this is happening all over America, from helping two million victims of the opioid crisis, to engineering major breakthroughs in nuclear fusion and helping make hearing aids affordable for 30 million people,” he continues.

“The Deep State is hard at work making America great,” he adds. “Just because we don’t know about it, doesn’t make it suspicious.”

The report concludes by accusing Trump of wanting to abolish these aspects of the federal government if elected in November.

Of course, this is not the Deep State Trump is referring to — he’s not calling for the abolishment or defunding of NASA or the Department of Labor.

What the NYT report conveniently ignores are the intelligence agencies that have weaponized their vast powers to manipulate domestic news coverage and target political opponents in recent years, namely Donald Trump and his allies.

It was the intelligence and law enforcement agencies that were behind the Russia collusion hoax, the Mueller probe, the first and second impeachments against Trump, the raid of Mar-a-Lago and subsequent lawfare campaigns, and the dissemination of misinformation about COVID’s origins, the experimental vaccines, and mitigation strategies.

Former CIA director John McLaughlin on Trump’s impeachment: “Thank God for the deep state” pic.twitter.com/t4pQhFOBuj

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 31, 2019

It was those agencies that have steered U.S. foreign policy into two new wars since Biden took office.

It was former top officials of these agencies who conspired to make Joe Biden win the 2020 election by lying to the American people about Hunter Biden’s laptop being Russian disinformation.

And recall that in 2021, Time magazine published a story called “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.”

In it, the outlet explained that the 2020 election was determined, not by the democratic process, but by “a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.”

“They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures,” the outlet added.

This is the Deep State Trump wants to take on.

Trump made his intention to eviscerate the Deep State perfectly clear in a speech last June.

“With you at my side, we will demolish the Deep State; we will expel the warmongers from our government; we will drive out the globalists; we will cast out the communists, marxists, and fascists; and we will throw off the sick political class that hates our country,” Trump stated. “We will rout the fake news media and we will defeat Crooked Joe Biden. We will liberate America from these villains once and for all!”

But in its signature deceptive fashion, the Times wants you to believe Trump is going after innocent non-political government workers just trying to do their jobs and not the nefarious intelligence agencies that dictate domestic and foreign policy behind the scenes.

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

Upcoming art installation criticized for attempting to erase English cultural identity and heritage, with others saying it’s an objectively bad piece of art.

A new statue to be featured in London’s Trafalgar Square will depict an obese black woman with a big rear end wearing a blue dress.

Yes, really.

The London mayor’s office announced a statue titled, “Lady in Blue,” will be installed at the historical tourist destination from 2026 through 2028.

According to the BBC, artist “Tschabalala Self’s sculpture Lady in Blue is made of bronze and covered in lapis lazuli blue – a rare and refined pigment that has been used since antiquity – and pays homage to a young metropolitan woman of colour.”

Self claimed the bronze statue, which will be installed at Trafalgar Square’s popular Fourth Plinth exhibition space, is meant as a contemporary depiction of an “everywoman” Londoner.

It’s intended to depict “a quotidian figure, a person like all others in the city,” Self said, adding, “In my mind I thought of her as a Londoner, a contemporary figure, a woman that many people could identify with.”

Embed from Getty Images Embed from Getty Images Embed from Getty Images Embed from Getty Images

However, numerous social media users took exception with the statue, accusing it of being the latest effort by subversive bureaucrats to erase English cultural identity and heritage, with others panning it as an objectively bad piece of art.

“This isn’t a joke. This is what won. It’s like being under occupation by a tyrant with the worst possible taste,” wrote one X user.

LMAO

— ZUBY: (@ZubyMusic) March 15, 2024

This is a joke. Right??

— The People’s Cube (@ThePeoplesCube) March 15, 2024

Finally, a statue to honor George Floyd.

— U.S. Ministry of Truth (@USMiniTru) March 15, 2024

*Insert Tucker quote about postmodern architecture*

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 15, 2024

Please tell me this is satire.

— Paul A. Szypula ?? (@Bubblebathgirl) March 15, 2024

ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS! pic.twitter.com/nL9TrVXteu

— Liberacrat Media™️ (@Liberacrat_) March 15, 2024

Same energy pic.twitter.com/4KQwonzpnb

— The Dank Knight ? (@capeandcowell) March 15, 2024

Honestly can’t stop laughing pic.twitter.com/w8Wt56LP0B

— The Dank Knight ? (@capeandcowell) March 15, 2024

We are being erased and history altered https://t.co/Tjuc0FXBzn

— TheBlackWolf (@thewolvenhour) March 15, 2024

If I were a Black woman in England, I would be highly insulted by this cartoonish appearance of the everyday Black woman. Today’s Black woman is lean, sleek and stylish.

— Sandy Phipps (@SandyPh61101501) March 16, 2024

The unflattering depiction of black women is being regarded as leftist London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s latest effort to rewrite and erase Western culture, as illegal immigrants flood Europe, displacing and replacing the current population.

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

Illegals receiving all the constitutional protections American citizens used to enjoy.

A federal judge has dropped gun charges against an illegal alien in Illinois, effectively ruling in defiance of federal law that illegal migrants have the right to carry guns in the U.S.

Section 922 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code bars illegal aliens from carrying guns or ammunition. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores was charged under this law when he was found in Chicago carrying a semi-automatic pistol.

But Obama-appointed Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman claimed that statute violates the Second Amendment rights of illegal aliens.

“The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense,” Coleman ruled on March 8.

Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers had argued that “Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States.”

Despite the lawyers ignoring a 2023 ruling that found that Second Amendment rights aren’t afforded to illegal aliens, Judge Coleman ruled in favor of the defendant.

“The government argues that Carbajal-Flores is a noncitizen who is unlawfully present in this country. The court notes, however, that Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” Coleman wrote.

“Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants. The court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense.”

The ruling was widely criticized on social media, with many noting the government is taking pains to afford illegal aliens constitutional rights while at the same time laboring to curtail those rights for U.S. citizens.

This means the terrorists who have come across can carry weapons… They are making it easy.

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) March 19, 2024

!!

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 19, 2024

But why do they want to disarm legal citizens? pic.twitter.com/CkLUGZaXYW

— Liberty Pill Memes (@LibertyPillMeme) March 19, 2024

US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman has ruled that a federal ban on illegal immigrants owning guns is unconstitutional

Activist judges are exploiting the constitution to take guns away from American citizens while giving them to illegals

She is a Barack Obama appointee

— Arynne Wexler (@ArynneWexler) March 18, 2024

At that point what is the point t of any sort of license? If they can drive without a license, carry a gun…I mean it would seem that citizens are the ones the laws affect

— Harvey Dent (@HDent78) March 18, 2024

So undocumented criminals roaming the streets now have a Constitutionally protected right to bear arms, while Americans see their rights infringed, and the sovereignty of their Country turned into a joke?

— Keez Nuts (@KeezNuts) March 18, 2024

The best part of this illegal alien/gun situation is that his argument is basically, “Of course I need a gun. I’m in Chicago!” pic.twitter.com/FXlno4jHvg

— Lee (Greater) (@shortmagsmle) March 19, 2024

This is fantastic news for the illegal alien gangs who’ve poured into the country from all over the world under Joe Biden’s open-border policies.

Imagine if the government protected our rights the way it does the rights of illegal aliens.

Read the ruling:

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

Along with combatting mass immigration (illegal and legal), fighting for secure elections is also important

The Civil Rights movement of the mid-20th century occupies an important part of our history.

It is frequently referenced by contemporary politicians to make arguments about today’s issues.

Is this tactic always valid?

Consider a recent speech delivered by U.S. Attorney General Merrick S. Garland at the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Selma, Alabama, in commemoration of the 59th anniversary of Bloody Sunday in 1965.

(Was it a violation of the “Separation of Church and State” for the Attorney General to speak at a church? Of course not. After all, Garland is an official in the Biden administration.)

Here are some excerpts from Garland’s speech:

The Justice Department owes an enormous debt of gratitude to the courageous activists who marched here in Selma 59 years ago. And to those who will march today.

The AG thus established a linkage in the minds of his listeners, associating what occurred 59 years ago with a very different situation today.

There are many things that are open to debate in America. One thing that must not be open for debate is the right of all eligible citizens to vote and to have their vote counted.

Nearly all Americans would be in agreement with that.

Garland addressed obstacles to the right to vote which American blacks have faced in our history.

The AG discussed the Reconstruction era, when “white supremacists used violence and threats of violence to stop Black Americans from exercising their right to vote.”

Garland talked about the mid-20th century.

But the right to vote was still under attack nearly a century later, when Black residents trying to register to vote in this county, and in jurisdictions across the country, were required to take nearly impossible tests that were designed to ensure that they fail.

And the right to vote was under attack on Sunday, March 7, 1965, when civil rights activists set out to march from Selma to Montgomery and were met with horrific violence.

The marchers’ courage helped usher into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which gave the Justice Department important authorities to protect the right to vote.

Now, 59 years later, AG Garland says the right to vote is again under attack.

[C]ourt decisions in recent years have drastically weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act that marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge bled for 59 years ago.

Really?

And since those decisions, there has been a dramatic increase in legislative measures that make it harder for millions of eligible voters to vote and to elect the representatives of their choice.

This is a serious charge the AG is making here. But does he back it up?

Garland gives several examples of attacks on the right to vote.

Nevertheless, in his entire speech Garland NEVER gives one example of a contemporary American citizen, of any race, who has been denied the right to vote.

Not one example.

Yet Garland authoritatively declares, “The right to vote is still under attack. And that is why the Justice Department is fighting back.”

And also –

That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.

Mail-in ballots and drop boxes were controversial practices associated with the disputed 2020 election.

And as for requiring secure photo voter ID, we’ve been told it disenfranchises people.

However, Mexico – where I formerly resided – has a very good voter registration system. In Mexico, the government issues photo voter ID.

Why can’t we have that here?

Along with combatting mass immigration (illegal and legal), fighting for secure elections is also important.

And here’s some good news: On February 29, three days prior to Garland’s speech, a federal judge in Arizona ruled that requiring voters to verify citizenship was not discriminatory.

---

Alex Jones Warns – Beware the Ides of March