Start ’Em Young: Government Climate Alarmists Brainwashing Kids to Comply with Green Tyranny
Climate alarmists in the federal government are now brainwashing children with an “inescapable death spiral” if they do not comply with green tyranny.
The Washington Free Beacon reported on this matter, citing the Climate Kids webpage operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA). While the webpage includes educational materials and activities for children, it also parrots talking points from the climate alarmists. These include claims like “the world is undergoing cataclysmic warming,” “sea levels are rising” and “global ice coverage is diminishing.”
Just like the green tyrants claim, the Climate Kids page claims that fossil fuels are to blame for “pollution, the destruction of landscapes and natural habitats, oil spills in the ocean, and nasty fracking chemicals in the ground.” It also proclaims that global warming is the “biggest problem of all” despite studies that prove that the world’s temperatures are actually cooling.
(Related: NO WARMING AT ALL: Global COOLING continues for eighth straight year, according to NOAA data.)
The Free Beacon also showed an example of NASA’s Climate Kids webpage brainwashing children about the dangers of “climate change” and rising sea levels. One image predicted that cities like New Orleans and Miami could be underwater. However, the site does not show a timeline as to when it will happen.
Meanwhile, the NOAA Education Portal managed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also peddles talking points from climate alarmists. It includes a curriculum with catastrophic language about global warming. “Courses linked on the portal, for example, encourage students to foster negative emotions about the state of the environment into taking action,” noted the Free Beacon.
“The online resources appear to be a peg in the Biden-Harris administration’s broader strategy of aiming climate messaging at younger generations.”
Texas Sen. Cruz to investigate the two climate portals
According to the Free Beacon, the NASA Climate Kids webpage was created during the Obama administration in 2012. However, the NOAA Education Portal was made under the Biden administration only in 2022.
The webpages did not sit well with U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee, with both now the subject of an investigation he is spearheading. On Aug. 22, he wrote letters to NASA Administrator Bill Nelson and NOAA Administration Richard Spinrad over the two resources. Cruz demanded information from the two officials about their efforts to stoke climate anxiety and “manufacture support” for “radical environmental activism.”
The senator accused the two agencies of producing “faux-educational materials that fuel climate alarmism” to generate support for the Biden administration’s climate agenda. Such fearmongering, he noted, contributes to the rise of “eco-anxiety” among young Americans.
“Young people are absorbing the rhetoric. They report high levels of anxiety about climate change and are adapting their behavior in radical ways, including by foregoing children. Is this anxiety based on science or sensationalism? The evidence points to the latter.”
Cruz wrote in his letter to Nelson that the prediction of submerged cities shown in the Climate Kids webpage wouldn’t happen for hundreds of years, if it will, based on the most updated analyses. “Our country’s approach to climate change should be driven by science, not the woke zeitgeist,” the senator wrote.
The Texas Republican meanwhile wrote in his letter to Spinrad that a video from 2012 in the NOAA Education Portal warned that melting ice caps could create an “inescapable death spiral.” The same video warned that “global warming” would leave no ice in the Arctic Ocean by 2022. However, NASA’s own data showed the opposite – the minimum extent of Arctic ice has increased by 29 percent since the video’s creation.
NASA spokeswoman Jennifer Dooren told the Free Beacon that her agency received the letter and would respond to the senator directly. Meanwhile, NOAA – which is under the Department of Commerce – did not respond to a request for comment.
Visit ClimateAlarmism.news for similar stories.
Afghan Child Rapists Paid €1,000 Following Deportation from Germany
An Afghan child rapist has been handed €1,000 by the German government following his deportation back to his homeland along with 27 other convicted criminals.
The unnamed individual claimed to be 16 years of age when he was convicted of the rape and sexual assault of an 11-year-old girl in Neustrelitz Castle Park back in July 2022.
The case sparked outrage among conservative politicians after the perpetrator received a one-year suspended prison sentence for the attack.
However, Germany’s Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser confirmed that 28 Afghan criminals had been deported in the first repatriation effort to Afghanistan since the return to power of the Taliban.
The deportees had all been convicted of serious offenses in Germany during their stay in Europe, including rape, aggravated arson, and drug offenses. Some had been under orders to leave German territory since 2019 but had remained living in the country.
Each migrant received €1,000 from the federal government to assist with living expenses in their homeland for between six to nine months.
State ministers affiliated with the current left-liberal traffic-light federal coalition government have started to talk tough on the deportation of foreign criminals following a surge in support for anti-immigration parties.
“For us, anyone who has a right to protection will find help in Rhineland-Palatinate, but we have no place for anyone who commits serious crimes in our society,” said Rheinland-Pfalz Integration Minister Katharina Binz of the Greens.
“We have to significantly increase the number of deportations,” said SPD Interior Minister George Maier in Thuringia, the German state that witnessed a historic victory for the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) party over the weekend by topping the polls for the first time ever in a state election.
Rhetoric across Germany towards the ramping up of deportations has increased recently following the latest stabbing spree in Solingen where a Syrian migrant stabbed several people at a diversity festival, killing three.
Italy: ‘I Don’t Know Why. I Saw Her and Killed Her’ — Malian Migrant Confesses to Murder of Sharon Verzeni
A man arrested on Thursday on suspicion of stabbing to death an Italian woman as she took an evening stroll near her home in July this year has confessed to the murder, claiming he had no idea why he attacked his victim.
Moussa Sangare, the 31-year-old Italian citizen born to Malian immigrants, admitted stabbing 33-year-old Sharon Verzeni four times on a small street, Terno d’Isola, in Bergamo, in the early hours of July 30 this year.
Sharon had decided to take a late-night walk while her partner slept when she was accosted by Sangare who stabbed her three times in the back and once in the chest — an attack her autopsy revealed was rapid and which left her no time to react.
As her attacker fled, Sharon managed to call the emergency services to tell them, “He stabbed me,” but died shortly after her transfer to the hospital.
A widescale search for Sharon’s killer took place last month, with the Italian authorities particularly interested in the identity of a man caught on CCTV footage fleeing the vicinity of the murder on a bicycle.
That man was later identified as Sangare who was arrested last week and admitted to the murder.
“Tonight, at the end of very intense investigations, we were able to identify the gentleman on the bicycle who during the night first made spontaneous statements and then made a full confession,” Bergamo’s deputy prosecutor Maria Cristina Rota told the press.
During his police interview, Sangare claimed to have “had a sudden fit” which prompted him to attack Sharon — a woman he had never met and had no prior knowledge of.
“I can’t explain why it happened, I saw her and I killed her”, Sangare told the police.
However, the local prosecutor’s office claimed the killer left his house equipped with four knives, leading them to believe the attack was premeditated.
“The aim was obvious, he wanted to hurt someone,” said Rota, who revealed that his statements to the police led to the recovery of his clothes worn that evening along with several knives unused in the attack, and crucially, the recovery of another knife buried near the Adda River the prosecutor believes is the murder weapon.
“We believe this based on the length and width of the blade, which is compatible with the wounds found by the medical examiner on the body,” the deputy prosecutor told journalists.
The investigation also found that two minors, aged 15 and 16, had been threatened by Sangare with a knife just moments before the murder. Rota explained how the killer Sangare “gave up with the two kids and then met Verzeni who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.”
The suspect, of Malian origin, lived just five kilometers from the crime scene in Suisio. He was unemployed and had no criminal record.
During a search of his property, police officers found a cardboard cutout the size of an adult human which had been used as a practice board for throwing knives.
Following the confession, a statement from Sharon’s family conveyed their relief that the killer had been apprehended and would be brought to justice.
“The news relieves us and also sweeps away all the speculations that have been made about Sharon’s life,” it read.
The killer’s lawyer has suggested the existence of a psychiatric illness that, if medically substantiated, could see Sangare avoid prison and be sent to a psychiatric facility.
“It is very likely that there is a psychiatric problem, even if it is premature and will be a topic to be explored further with consultancy and a possible request for an expert opinion, but this is still a very relevant aspect,” explained lawyer Giacomo Maj.
North Carolina REJECTS RFK Jr.’s Request to be Taken Off the State’s Ballot
The state of North Carolina has declined a request by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) to be taken off the state’s 2024 ballot.
The independent presidential candidate and nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy suspended his campaign on Aug. 23 during a press conference in Phoenix. He later joined former President Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, during the latter’s campaign rally in the city. RFK Jr. then endorsed Trump and exhorted his supporters to do the same.
In line with his withdrawal, RFK Jr. said he plans to remove his name from the ballot in states where it could potentially hurt Trump, while stating his intention to remain on the ballot in states where his presence would harm Democratic nominee and Vice President Kamala Harris.
“In about 10 battleground states where my presence would be a spoiler, I’m going to remove my name,” he said. “And I’ve already started that process and urge voters not for me.”
Officials in the Tar Heel State turned down his request, however. The North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) voted on Aug. 29 to keep RFK Jr. on the ballot, citing logistical and financial challenges. Despite this, votes cast for the now-withdrawn independent candidate won’t be counted.
WBTV 3 reported that the NCSBE made the decision due to the timing of his withdrawal, which coincided with the start of ballot printing across the state. Approximately 1.73 million ballots had already been printed in over 60 counties by the time the board voted on RFK Jr.’s request.
NCSBE Executive Director Karen Brinson also explained that reprinting and redistributing ballots without his name would require at least 13 days and incur additional costs. Thus, the board ruled it was impractical to make the changes given the tight timeline and financial considerations.
RFK Jr.’s name also stays on the ballot in Michigan
Michigan likewise rejected RFK Jr.’s request to have his name struck off the state ballot.
“RFK Jr.’s campaign reached out to the Michigan Bureau of Elections (MBE) … in an attempt to withdraw his name,” said Cheri Hardmon, a spokeswoman for the bureau. She subsequently told Michigan Public Radio that the campaign was informed that the Aug. 6 deadline to remove his name from the ballot had passed.
According to WKAR 23, RFK Jr. is on the state ballot as the nominee of the Natural Law Party of Michigan (NLPM) which helped its nominating convention in April. The MBE spokeswoman said it could have held a new nominating convention any time until the state’s August primary.
“The [NLPM] held their convention to select electors for RFK Jr. They cannot meet at this point to select new electors since it’s past the primary,” she explained. The NLPM and RFK Jr.’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment sent by WKAR 23.
Head over to RFKJr.news for similar stories.
Watch Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disclosing that he would be actively campaigning for former President Donald Trump during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.”
Some People say They’ve Been Injured by Neuroweapons. Should We Believe Them?
(LifeSiteNews) — Consider the following scenario: multiple reports describe people strangely losing their balance and feeling almost as if an invisible force had made them fall backwards. Some of the reports include other symptoms like confusion, visual disturbances, sharp, sometimes pin-pointed pain which randomly re-locates, and an overall feeling of disorientation. Most of the reports appear to be trustworthy although some are difficult to determine. Some report the phenomena in a hysterical way, but you determine that the hysterical reporting in and of itself does not necessarily discredit the source. Thinking about it a moment, you realize that if you experienced such phenomena, you might also report them or describe them in a hysterical way.
You assume the cause of the phenomena is not spiritual, supernatural, or of demonic origin; thus, as an inquiring person, you begin searching for scientific phenomena like chemicals and/or technologies which could cause such an effect. Diseases are ruled out as potential causes; for this scenario, we’ll say that those who reported the phenomena were also normally aware of their brain and physical state.
During your literature research, you discover the technologies described by scientists as “directed energy weapons” which use radiofrequency waves, microwaves, millimeter waves, or similar scientific phenomena to remotely, silently, and invisibly cause several of the effects (loss of balance, pain, confusion) described in the trustworthy reports as well as other harmful effects like visual disturbances, hearing problems, etc.
Continuing your search along these lines, you try to determine who would make and who could purchase such directed energy weapons. You discover that a major, reputable, and significantly government-funded arms manufacturer has developed a weapon which can be operated secretly and “shoots” invisible and silent millimeter waves that cause several of the described effects on the human body. Additionally, you discover that a separate company developed a similar, handheld, technology that can be used from over a mile away from the targeted person.
Then you discover that a handheld form of this weapon was developed almost 20 years ago and was openly marketed and advertised to police, the FBI, and other law enforcement entities. You search endlessly for confirmation that law enforcement owns and uses such technologies, but discover only that entities like the FBI and local police are allowed (or, rather, they allow themselves) to keep their technologies, methods, and employees secret.
Thus, about the only information you have is the above: the weapons were available and ready for use at least 20 years ago and advertised to police by a large company which manufactures arms for the military, and so on. What are some reasonable conclusions?
First, you think a minute and realize that a company would not openly advertise a technology to police and the FBI if that technology were illegal. Thus, you conclude that the technology should at least presumed to be (even if wrongly) legal.
Then you think about the type of people who work for local police and the FBI: the macho-man (or wannabe macho-man) and whichever kind of woman who, like the macho man, would say something like: “Man, this is cool. Never seen it, but I’d love to be like one of those Star Wars folks. I could knock people over and hurt them from a mile away with invisible and silent guns which shoot at the speed of light? Let’s buy 1,000,000 for the government, and I’ll borrow one for myself.”
You eventually realize that in many, if not most, professions there are people who could not possibly keep such technologies secret if they knew co-workers were using them. Thus, you conclude that while it is likely that the FBI and/or local police probably do use the silent and invisible directed energy weapons which were at one time advertised to them publicly, it is unlikely that they let many employees know about them. In fact, you conclude that such weapons would probably most often be used by those who live near a targeted person or are otherwise able to secretly get close to a targeted person.
In other words, undercover or secret police employees and their bosses are probably among the only people to know about the weapon. The other people likely to know about the weapon, of course, are the unfortunate targets of good physical and mental health who experience the strange effects.
Here you make an important conclusion: if such invisible and silent weapons are going to be prevented from future use, it will require listening to those who suggest they might have been hurt by them – even if those self-identifying victims are somewhat hysterical in their books or other reports.
Going further, you conclude it to be possible that the government might even plant false news stories claiming that police and other law enforcement have never used those technologies, or that the technologies were too large to be carried around, or some other propaganda to make Americans feel safe and as if the technologies were not used on them.
Thus, at this point in your research and thinking, you conclude that, at minimum, a secretly and remotely operated directed energy weapon is one possible cause of the trustworthy reports of having lost balance while feeling as if a force were pushing him backward and other symptoms described above.
Would those be reasonable conclusions? Or was the thought process described above flawed or even delusional?
This scenario has been presented to you in part because Americans should be committing to memory the fact that such a cause – a secretly operated remote weapon which causes falling and several other effects – has been available and advertised to police and other law enforcement since at least 2006.
The weapons use directed energy, also known as electromagnetic energy. To be specific, the technologies use millimeter wave energy, microwave energy (which can cause brain damage if focused into the skull), or other energy focused onto or “into” a target. Radiofrequency energy might also be used to describe such technologies.
(It is also relevant that microwaves can go through or “see through” walls, as exhibited by this Massachusetts Institute of Technology microwave camera and a similar U.S. government technology; such technology could be combined with directed energy weapons to harm and/or torture a person in their own home, in church, etc., by a person in a secret and remote location. The microwave cameras or other similar radar technology make it possible to see where a person is located in a building and the directed energy weapon can then be aimed at his location.)
There are multiple kinds of directed energy weapons, some not mentioned in this article. One apparently can be operated from over a mile away; some are hand-held, as small as a flashlight and/or pistol. The names of some of these weapons are the Defender, Guardian, and Silent Guardian. Raytheon, the relatively well-known U.S. military contractor, developed the Silent Guardian while a company named Laser Energetics, Inc. developed the Defender and Guardian. A law enforcement technology journal article from 2009 explains:
The Arizona-based Raytheon developed its ADS [active denial system] Silent Guardian in 2006. According to the company, Silent Guardian Protection System “uses millimeter wave technology to repel individuals without causing injury … without the use of lethal force.” The system sends a focused beam of millimeter wave energy penetrating into the target’s skin. This produces “an intolerable heating sensation” ceasing when the victim leaves the beam.
The statement that the millimeter wave technology is used “without causing injury” is controversial and might be incorrect, although the controversy and contrary evidence is not within the scope of this article. An archived Raytheon listing of the technology from 2006 explains that the Silent Guardian could be used by law enforcement and that “the system is available now and ready for action.”
Related technologies are described in the same 2009 law enforcement technology journal article:
Announced at this year’s [apparently 2009] Memorial Day parade in New York, Laser Energetic’s Dazer Lasers discharge a modulating green beam meant to temporarily impair a threat’s vision, equilibrium, awareness and causes nausea. When hit in the eyes, the effects take place immediately — even penetrating the eyelid if the threat closes his eyes, yet another reaction to aid in controlling the suspect. While the reactions are different, like Silent Guardian, “being dazed” begins to disappear once removed from the beam. Vision impairment and imbalance can last up to 30 seconds while the nausea may last longer.
Impairing “equilibrium” means causing a person to lose balance and potentially fall. Thus, while the weapons are said to be non-lethal, they clearly have the potential to cause death directly or indirectly (for example, causing someone to fall from a lethal height or to develop fatal pneumonia after breaking a hip). Meanwhile, a similar handheld technology was being developed by the U.S. government at approximately the same time. (How many more similar technologies were already developed but not publicized?)
Finally, it is significant that law enforcement technologies used by the FBI or local police may be kept secret; news articles which claim that “these technologies are not available yet” or “no law enforcement entity or police are using these technologies” might be incorrect. Stories about technologies always merely “in development” but not in use are to be expected. Such technologies could be kept secret from the media.
Now, there are several questions to ask here. Is it likely that law enforcement uses secret weapons (ones likely even more advanced and improved than the 2006 or 2009 models mentioned above)? One could reasonably conclude that law enforcement, at very least, might indeed be using the secret, invisible weapons.
The apparent popularity of such technologies – the fact that several different companies and the U.S. government were developing the technologies – and that the technologies were already “available” and “ready for use” in 2006 might suggest that the technology is currently in use.
Another question: Could the weapons mentioned above be described as “neuroweapons,” that is, weapons which affect the brain? Law enforcement and the makers of those weapons apparently do not describe them as such, but they are indeed neuroweapons for they do affect the brain (causing “equilibrium” problems, etc.). Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the U.S. government, local police, the FBI, and others could be secretly using neuroweapons against Americans. Other countries could also be using such weapons against their citizens.
Still another question: Could such a secret technology be used by government employees to torture someone? The answer is obviously yes, especially when, again, combined with microwave cameras or other radar technologies which see through walls. The torturer could see a person inside their home, church, etc. at any moment, and then use the other technologies to cause severe pain, loss of balance and falling, loss of vision or other visual problems, possibly even aneurysm rupture, and other types of torture. (Triggering an itch through histamine production (page 12) and muscle spasms (page 6) or twitches might be possible with remotely operated and focused electromagnetic energy technology, although advertisements for the specific weapons mentioned above do not mention these possibilities.)
READ: Is the US government pursuing the creation of a biosurveillance regime?
Then, what if a person is a likely target of neuroweapons? For example, say a person was known to be closely followed by law enforcement, and for whatever reason law enforcement employees do not like this person. Say the person experiences one or more of the symptoms described above during separate instances – loss of balance, vision disturbances, the feeling of some sort of force, confusion, brain aneurysm rupture, etc.–when they are sober and otherwise completely healthy. If law enforcement, the FBI, or other entities were to blame for harm to this person, how could he or she receive the justice that is his or her due?
The macho-man type found in law enforcement tends not to, as they say, “snitch,” on others within their group. This is the “blue wall of silence,” having a group dynamic in common with a mafia or a gang. If one member harms someone or commits other crimes, most of the others do not even think about risking becoming unpopular by snitching. Also, obviously, law enforcement employees have weapons – potentially or likely including the secretly functioning weapons mentioned above. Is a law enforcement employee going to blow the whistle on co-workers if he or she knows that the co-workers could covertly retaliate by torturing him or her?
Even further is the problem of how government lawyers would go about prosecuting the people they depend on for what they do. To risk seeming hyperbolic, would a government prosecutor or attorney general go after her chefs, chauffeurs, or bodyguards? Phenomenology and common sense say, “Probably not.”
Still, there is a need for laws which at least attempt to protect citizens from such harm. These laws should be retroactive (in part because, although they are invisible, the above weapons are violent and their use could be torture) in the event that future government employees will do more to provide justice to some harmed by such technologies.
The discussion could continue, but the reader will have got the point: if a person suggests (even hysterically, again, because strange phenomena like feeling an invisible force push one backwards normally cause terror) that they might have been the target of secretly operated invisible and silent neuroweapons, it is reasonable to, at minimum, conclude that such secret weapons used by police or other government entities are a possible cause.
Most of Today’s Vaccines are Developed with Aborted Fetal Cell Lines – Here’s the Full List
The abortion industry, the organ harvesting industry and the vaccine industry work together. Their operations go hand-in-hand. The current supply of vaccines for children and adults is based on a history of brutality toward the unborn. In order to develop vaccines, human fetuses must be strategically picked apart, their organs harvested, the cell lines reproduced for vaccine manufacture.
There are six main types of cell lines used to develop biologics (vaccines). Four of these cell lines involve the sacrificial use of aborted fetal cells. The list of vaccines that exploit fetal cell lines in the manufacturing process is exhaustive.
These aborted fetal cell lines include the WI-38 diploid human cell line, which is composed of fibroblasts taken from the lung tissue of a 3-month-gestation female fetus. Vaccines also utilize the HEK-293 cell line, which is isolated from the kidney of a human embryo. Third, vaccines contain the MRC-5 diploid cell line, which consists of fibroblasts isolated from the lung tissue of a white male, 14-week-old embryo. Finally, vaccines are derived from the RA 27/3 cell lines, which have been taken from attenuated fetal kidney cells since 1964.
Here is the full list of vaccines that contain the WI-38 cell line:
1. MMR (M-M-R II)
• Type: Live attenuated
• Components: Measles, mumps, rubella
2. MMR (ProQuad)
• Type: Live attenuated
• Components: Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella
3. Varicella (Varivax)
• Type: Live attenuated
• Components: Varicella-zoster virus (chickenpox)
4. Zoster (Zostavax)
• Type: Live attenuated
• Components: Varicella-zoster virus (shingles)
5. Hepatitis A (Havrix)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Hepatitis A virus
6. Hepatitis A (Vaqta)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Hepatitis A virus
7. Rabies (RabAvert)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Rabies virus
8. Rabies (Imovax)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Rabies virus
9. Pentacel
• Type: Combination (inactivated and toxoid)
• Components: Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP), polio, Hib
10. Kinrix
• Type: Combination (inactivated and toxoid)
• Components: Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP), polio
11. ProQuad (MMRV)
• Type: Live attenuated
• Components: Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella
Here is the full list of vaccines that contain the HEK-293 cell line:
1. COVID-19 Vaccines
• Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) – mRNA vaccine
• Spikevax (Moderna) – mRNA vaccine
• Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca/Oxford) – Viral vector vaccine
• Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine – Viral vector vaccine
2. Shingles (Shingrix)
• Type: Recombinant
• Components: Recombinant varicella-zoster virus (shingles)
3. Hepatitis A (Havrix)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Hepatitis A virus
4. Hepatitis A (Vaqta)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Hepatitis A virus
5. Rabies (RabAvert)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Rabies virus
6. Rabies (Imovax)
• Type: Inactivated
• Components: Rabies virus
7. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines
• Gardasil 9 – Recombinant HPV vaccine
8. Hepatitis B (HEPLISAV-B)
• Type: Recombinant
• Components: Hepatitis B virus surface antigen
Here is the full list of vaccines that contain the MRC-5 cell line:
1. MMR Vaccine (Measles, Mumps, Rubella)
• Examples: MMR II (Merck), Priorix (GlaxoSmithKline)
2. Varicella Vaccine (Chickenpox)
• Examples: Varivax (Merck), ProQuad (Merck, which combines MMR and varicella)
3. Hepatitis A Vaccine
• Examples: Havrix (GlaxoSmithKline), Vaqta (Merck)
4. Rabies Vaccine
• Examples: RabAvert (Pfizer), Imovax Rabies (Sanofi Pasteur)
5. Polio Vaccine (Inactivated Polio Vaccine, IPV)
• Some IPV vaccines, like those produced by various manufacturers, might use MRC-5 cells in some production processes, though often Vero cells are used.
6. Shingles Vaccine (Herpes Zoster)
• Examples: Zostavax (Merck, for older vaccine), Shingrix (GlaxoSmithKline, primarily produced using insect cells, but initial strains may involve MRC-5)
7. Some Vaccines for Cancer Treatment
• Examples: Certain experimental cancer vaccines and treatments might use MRC-5 cells.
8. Certain Influenza Vaccines
• Some influenza vaccines might use MRC-5 cells in their production process, though this varies widely by manufacturer and formulation.
Here is the full list of vaccines that contain the RA 27/3 cell line:
1. MMR Vaccine (Measles, Mumps, Rubella)
• MMR II (Merck)
• Priorix (GlaxoSmithKline)
2. MMRV Vaccine (Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella)
• ProQuad (Merck)
3. Single Antigen Rubella Vaccine
• Meruvax II (Merck)
• MMR (Single Antigen) (Various brands in different countries)
The current vaccine supply is fundamentally tainted with the blood of slain human beings. Products that are developed with morally controversial procedures should be re-evaluated and considered both unethical and unscientific. While these vaccine products remain on the market, a growing number of families are rejecting them based on religious grounds, and are invoking religious exemptions to vaccination for school, work and travel.