Top Comedian Kurt Metzger Joins Alex Jones Live In-Studio
Comedian and writer Kurt Metzger went on the Tuesday Alex Jones Show to discuss world events such as 9/11, mind manipulation, big tech censorship, free speech crackdowns, the P. Diddy raid, fake news false flags, DMT hallucinogens, the controversial Kanye West interview and much more with the Infowars host.
Don’t miss:
EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn Calls Baltimore Barge Disaster A Black Swan Event
The American Journal: Middle East War Intensifies – Israel Increases Strikes In Gaza, Syria & Lebanon
“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.
Follow The American Journal on Telegram:
NATO Tells Ukraine to Bolster Troop Numbers Through Accelerated Conscription
Chairman of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization‘sMilitary Committee, Lt. Adm. Rob Bauer of the Royal Netherlands Navy, has called for Ukraine to bolster its troop numbers through conscription to offset its massive losses on the battlefield.
Bauer made this statement during the opening session of the Kyiv Security Forum, a conference organized annually by former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
In his appearance at the conference, Bauer stressed the need for not only replenishing Ukraine’s stockpile of weaponry but also augmenting the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine due to the massive casualties incurred in combat with Russia.
He underscored that while the West can offer additional armaments and financial aid to support Ukraine’s military, the Ukrainians themselves must supply the manpower.
(Related: Warmonger Lindsey Graham urges Ukraine to expand its CONSCRIPTION efforts.)
Bauer acknowledged NATO’s inadequate response in terms of weapon and ammunition production concerning the Ukraine conflict. He advocated for a collective effort akin to the approach taken by the world’s nations to combat the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, asserting that societal sacrifices are imperative.
Notably, Bauer emphasized that such sacrifices primarily entail the involvement of others, distancing himself and fellow proponents of war from personal risk.
In a forward-looking statement, Bauer rejected pessimism, asserting that confidence in Ukraine’s potential for success is well-founded based on factual assessment.
Previously, discussions on changes to Ukraine’s military mobilization law back in December highlighted the country’s need to enlist an additional 500,000 conscripts to reinforce frontline units and establish new military formations.
However, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky later revised this to a lower figure, suggesting a lesser need for mobilization. Despite this, the Ukrainian parliament has yet to vote on proposed amendments to the mobilization law, sparking intense debate within the country.
Many young Ukrainian men dodging the draft
At the beginning of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine back in February 2022, an early burst of patriotic fervor saw military recruitment centers swarming with volunteers, both young and old. But this nationalistic desire to serve the nation has waned as the conflict enters its third year and as casualties increase. Many soldiers returning from the frontline due to injuries and their terms of enlistment ending also dissuaded potential recruits.
Artem, a 28-year-old Ukrainian, is among the many young men in his country who are evading conscription and refraining from registering their details with mobilization centers as required. He moves cautiously, avoiding places like metro stations where police conduct document checks to catch draft dodgers.
“Some of my friends are even more cautious. They hardly leave their homes,” Artem admits.
In an interview with Politico at a coffee house in downtown Kyiv, Artem reportedly exhibited “the air of a fugitive,” with him wearing a baseball cap pulled low over his eyes, even on cloudy days. He spoke with Politico reporter Jamie Dettmer in hushed tones to avoid attracting attention, and he also kept surveying his surroundings warily.
Artem and his friends fear being thrust into prolonged combat with uncertain outcomes. Their reluctance to enlist reflects broader concerns about the toll of prolonged warfare and the lack of clarity on when they could return to normalcy.
There is a growing sense of pessimism regarding the outcome of the conflict, with more people questioning Ukraine’s ability to overcome Moscow’s forces.
The urgency to replenish the ranks of soldiers has never been greater, given the relentless toll on human lives. However, Ukrainian authorities are grappling with conflicting approaches – whether to persuade or coerce citizens into military service – as well as fears over the political repercussions of the latter.
So far, Zelensky has resisted calls for a general mobilization. Efforts to pass legislation to address the challenges with manpower are mired in political discord, with lawmakers hesitant to take responsibility over the proposals for expanded conscription. Even members of Zelensky’s government and political party are objecting to proposed measures, alleging they are unconstitutional.
The Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs has already opened around 9,000 cases of draft evasion since the conflict began. But this reportedly barely scratches the surface of the widespread evasion of conscription and draft registration.
The situation is compounded by reports of inadequate weaponry and artillery shells on the frontlines, further dampening enthusiasm for enlistment among Ukrainians like Artem.
Watch this video of Ukrainian recruitment officers beating up a young man who is resisting the draft.
EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn Calls Baltimore Barge Disaster A Black Swan Event
Biden Calls Putin ‘A Butcher’
US President Joe Biden has disparaged his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin for the second time in two months, publicly calling him a “butcher” in connection with the Ukraine conflict.
Biden made the jab while speaking at a campaign event in Raleigh, North Carolina, on Tuesday. He advocated raising the average federal tax for America’s wealthiest from 8.2% to 25%, arguing that this would allow Washington to raise $400 billion over the next ten years.
“Imagine what we could do with that. We could fundamentally slash the federal deficit… We could do so many things – consequential – including finally making sure that we take care of Ukraine from that butcher Putin,” he said.
Biden also lashed out at the Russian president in late February, calling him a “crazy S.O.B.” He mentioned Putin while saying that the West must be wary of a nuclear conflict, but should pay even more attention to the danger posed by climate change.
Read more Putin responds to Biden’s ‘crazy S.O.B.’ insult
At the time, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov suggested that Americans should be ashamed of a leader who indulged in such comments. “If the president of that nation uses that kind of language, that is shameful,” he said, adding that Biden may have been trying to emulate a “Hollywood cowboy” to appeal to domestic audiences.
Responding to the “S.O.B.” remarks, Putin stood by his previously expressed opinion that Moscow would be better off with Biden in the White House, adding that the US President’s words only prove his point. “It’s not like he could say ‘Good job… thank you for the helping hand’. We understand what is going on there, in terms of internal politics,” he explained.
This is not the first time that Biden has labeled Putin a “butcher.” The first instance dates back to March 2022, several weeks after the start of the Ukraine conflict. Peskov suggested that such offensive comments “narrow down the window for bilateral relations” at a time when Russia-US ties have sunk to a historic low.
In 2021, Biden also called Putin “a killer.” The Russian president retorted, “It takes one to know one,” following that remark.
EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn Calls Baltimore Barge Disaster A Black Swan Event
Planned Parenthood Facing New Allegations of Illegally Selling Aborted Baby Tissue
New evidence has emerged to show that Planned Parenthood “sells late-term aborted baby body parts in violation of federal law,” just as we have been reporting for years.
Planned Parenthood allegedly forged a partnership with the University of California – San Diego (UCSD) to profit from the “harvesting and sale” of aborted human babies for “research patents.”
“This new evidence shows Planned Parenthood sells late-term aborted baby body parts in violation of federal law, for far more money than has ever been discussed before,” said David Daleiden, founder and president of the California-based Center for Medical Progress, which filed a public records request to obtain this damning information.
“Planned Parenthood’s national headquarters knew about and approved these sales of aborted babies for valuable consideration as part of government-funded research grants.”
(Related: Did you know that Planned Parenthood performs secret abortions on young teens “so the parents won’t find out?”)
UCSD, Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest committing federal crimes
The unearthed documents show that Planned Parenthood has been explicitly sending the aborted baby body parts to UCSD for “valuable consideration” in exchange for ownership of the patents and intellectual property the university develops upon experimenting with the tissue.
A “Biological Materials Transfer Agreement” spells out the alleged deal, though much of the information is redacted. The document shows that Planned Parenthood granted UCSD “access” to “fetal and placental tissue,” which are described as the “proprietary materials” of Planned Parenthood San Diego.
In return for all this, the deal allows Planned Parenthood full rights to “patents” and “intellectual property” developed through experiments with the “material,” also known as the aborted baby body parts and tissue.
Signed in 2009, the contract was updated in 2014 to reflect Planned Parenthood’s regional renaming to “Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest.” All of the original terms and conditions from the original contract remained in full force and effect, the update stipulated.
Emails sent by UCSD in 2017 refer to the contract while updating an additional contract for clinical personnel. Later emails in 2020 show the university requesting that parties involved remain “especially careful” about “any rights” that the providers of fetal tissue “retain” in the “material.”
It cannot be emphasized enough that federal law explicitly forbids this type of arrangement between Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest and UCSD. The “valuable consideration” portion, meaning the exchanging of aborted baby parts for profit, is at the crux of the crime, especially since UCSD’s research is leading to the creation of patents.
During the 2021-22 academic year, the University of California (UC) system generated more than $127 million in revenue for all patent inventions, Daleiden said in his statement.
Violations of applicable federal laws in this case are punishable by up to 10 years of prison and a fine of up to $500,000, says the Center for Medical Progress.
Other emails exchanged between UCSD and Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest show plans for collaborative research meetings, including a quarterly meeting in which a “payment” is to be discussed.
In an email written by UCSD employees, one of the meetings was scheduled to “have results to share on samples recently collected,” as well as to discuss the formation of a “fellowship.”
Planned Parenthood’s response to that email states that there are “[n]o current issues with the collection program,” but that the abortion provider has “some questions about payment to the residency program.”
Keep in mind that UCSD is a taxpayer-funded operation, meaning California and U.S. taxpayers, in the case of federal funding, are paying for this illegal racket to take place.
The latest news about America’s abortion cash cow can be found at Abortions.news.
EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn Calls Baltimore Barge Disaster A Black Swan Event
‘Attempt to Break The Independence of The Polish Central Bank’ – PM Tusk Tries to Bring Central Bank Under Government Control in Unprecedented Move
The ruling coalition headed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk has accused the head of the central bank, Adam Glapiński, of breaking several laws and of violating his constitutional obligation to uphold the political independence of the National Bank of Poland (NBP).
If the required motion passes, Glapiński will be the first person since 2006 brought before the State Tribunal, a body empowered to sanction the highest officials of the state. However, he has dismissed the accusations against him as “idiotic.”
The indictment prepared in parliament includes eight charges, including the purchase of state bonds that led to the indirect financing of the state budget deficit by the central bank, weakening Poland’s currency (PLN or zloty), failure to control inflation, and alleged violation of the apolitical nature of the office of the NBP head.
The motion was signed by 191 of the 459 active members of parliament. That is more than the 115 MPs required to support such a motion. It will now be assessed by a parliamentary committee before going to the full chamber for a final decision by a simple majority in the presence of at least half of MPs to begin a trial by the State Tribunal.
Should that happen, the governor could be suspended from his position during the legal proceedings. However, the Constitutional Tribunal, the top court in Poland, which the Tusk government claims is illegitimate, recently ruled that parliament may only put the head of the NBP on trial with a super majority of three-fifths of its total membership.
Glapiński, in an interview for the Financial Times, has called the allegations made by the ruling majority “idiotic” and warned that putting him on trial would be very bad for Poland. He expressed the desire to “meet and talk” with Tusk to set straight the issues between them.
On Tuesday, the NBP board made their position on the matter clear. One of its members, Paweł Szałamacha, called the move to unseat Glapiński an “attempt to break the independence of the Polish central bank” and an “assault on the fundamentals of the Polish state and its economy.”
Szałamacha rejected the charge regarding buying bonds during the pandemic; he noted that this was also the case in most Western countries and that the operations of Poland’s bank were fully transparent.
The idea of bringing Glapiński before the State Tribunal has also been criticized by the previous ruling party, Law and Justice (PiS). On Saturday, its leader, Jarosław Kaczyński, warned that it would lead to “a lowering of Poland’s credibility, a weakening of the currency, and a reluctance of foreign companies to invest in Poland.”
In December last year, the head of the European Central Bank (ECB) assured Glapiński that he would be protected by EU law if the incoming government unlawfully suspended and prosecuted him. The ECB has recently protested the attempted suspension of the central bank governor in Latvia, with the matter going before the European Court of Justice.
In Poland’s post-communist history, only two people have been convicted by the State Tribunal: a minister and a senior customs official in relation to a corruption scandal involving the import of alcohol in the 1990s. The last time the parliament voted to bring someone before the tribunal was in 2005, when former Treasury Minister Emil Wąsacz was put on trial. The case against him was eventually discontinued in 2019.
EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn Calls Baltimore Barge Disaster A Black Swan Event