News

Dementia Joe strikes again!

Joe Biden dropped a whopper of a lie during remarks Tuesday, falsely claiming he once traveled by train across the historic Francis Scott Key Bridge — despite the absence of a rail line.

Biden’s tall tale came during a statement on the Baltimore bridge collapse after it was struck by a massive barge transporting shipping containers.

“At about 1:30 a container ship struck the Francis Scott Key bridge, which I have been over many, many times commuting from the state of Delaware either by train or by car,” Biden said.

The problem is the “Key Bridge” has a four-lane highway and is completely devoid of train tracks.

The disingenuous comment immediately raised eyebrows on social media, where users called out Biden’s lie.

“Very impressive!” wrote X user Collin Rugg. “Biden, who appeared to be taking a train that didn’t need tracks to operate, said he remembers all the times he commuted on the bridge.”

The overt lie is just the latest example of how Biden is losing touch with reality as he slips further into his dementia-ridden senility.

---

---

In separate videos, four women say they were walking in the Big Apple when the unexpected attacks occurred.

Multiple female social media influencers have reported being assaulted while walking the streets of New York City, with assailants suddenly coming out of nowhere and quickly punching the victims.

A spate of incidents have been documented on TikTok, illustrating a disturbing pattern of unwarranted attacks targeting innocent, vulnerable women.

In separate videos, four women say they were minding their own business walking in the Big Apple when the unexpected attacks occurred.

Influencer Jill Burke first described being assaulted in a video posted on Feb. 8th, showing off a black eye in her video she says was caused by a man who bashed her with a bag full of heavy objects.

@jill_burke be safe out there ladies #nyc #assault ♬ original sound – Jill Burke

---

@halleykate

• Our fan-favorite Turbo Force Plus is now 40% off! See for yourself the delicious one-of-a-kind energy boost infowarriors CRAVE!

♬ original sound – halley

---

@mikaylatoninato @halley ♬ original sound – mikayla

---

“I literally just got punched by some man on the sidewalk. He goes, ‘Sorry,’ and then punches me — in the head,” one woman described, adding, “Holy fuck, what the hell just happened? Oh my God.”

@olivia.brand

I &lt3 nyc

♬ original sound – Olivia Brand

Here’s a compilation of all four videos on X:

The New York Post reports the NYPD is aware of, and actively investigating, the incidents:

“The NYPD confirmed the narratives of Kate and Brand, saying that a 23-year-old woman reported an assault at West 16th Street and 7th Avenue at 10:20 a.m. Monday, as with Kate’s report. She was treated at a medical facility for injuries to the left side of her face, cops said.”

On March 17, a 25-year-old was walking her dog just before noon at Kenmare and Mulberry streets when an “unknown individual punched her in the head,” according to officials when asked about Brand’s video.

It was unclear if the incidents were connected, police said.

The incidents are being compared to the senseless, unprovoked attacks targeting random people known as the “knockout game,” which began rising in popularity in big cities in 2012.

---

---

Watch and share this exclusive interview!

General Michael Flynn joins Alex Jones live to give his expert analysis of the Baltimore barge-bridge disaster.

Read More:

---

Tucker Carlson asked the potential Trump vice president selection who is actually running the government.

Former Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard told Tucker Carlson this week that it’s “not a leap of imagination to know that” Joe Biden is not actually running the country.

Gabbard, who Donald Trump is reportedly considering as a vice president candidate, mentioned Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton “continue to wield immense power in influencing decisions made” by the Biden administration.

Tucker asked, “Who is running the government at this point? It’s obviously not Joe Biden. You think Hillary Clinton?”

“It’s not a leap of imagination to know that that’s true when you look at the people who are in Joe Biden’s administration. They are the people who were the right hands for President Obama and for Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton said herself the other day. She said, ‘Oh, yeah. I talk to the White House every day.’ So, it’s no shock or surprise who the influences are behind the policies that are coming out of this White House,” Gabbard answered.

The duo also discussed former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her bizarre knack for picking stocks that immediately skyrocket.

Gabbard told Carlson that Pelosi’s fellow politicians won’t call her out on the blatant insider trading “because most of them benefit from it.”

“No member of Congress or the Senate or their spouse or their senior staff should be allowed to trade in stocks, period, full stop,” Tulsi added. “There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses.”

Gabbard also brought up the infamous U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine that have stirred controversy since Russia launched its invasion of the Eastern European nation in 2022.

Watch the full interview below:

---

---

Watch the full debate here and decide who won!

Last night kicked off the fifth ZeroHedge debate on the question: “Should Donald Trump be the next U.S. President?”

The debate featured Infowars host Alex Jones and former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos vs. independent journalist Michael Tracy and former George W. Bush White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter.

Tracey came in hot, accusing Trump of being two-faced for bashing special interests during the primary, while courting the donor class during the general election:

“[Trump] was calling out to Miriam Adelson — who’s the widow of Sheldon Adelson — and having private soirees with her, and she’s excepted to give millions of dollars to Trump’s next campaign. He even said it outright. He said because of Miriam’s late husband, [Trump] was compelled to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv in Israel to Jerusalem.“

Michael Tracey on Trump’s quoted tweet:https://t.co/vLlq5hS5Cu
“When Trump became the Republican nominee in 2016, what did he do? He courted the donors that he had just gotten the nomination by castigating, including Adelson who went on to become the most prolific donor.” pic.twitter.com/ylcc5czCFS

• Introducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off! This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being.

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 26, 2024

In an enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend spirit, Alex Jones argued that entrenched bureaucratic powers within the U.S. pose an existential threat. Thus, given that Donald Trump is the primary force standing in their way, he deserves mass support.

“We need somebody disruptive,” said Jones.

Alex Jones: “That’s why we must back Trump all the way because if they can take down the popular front-runner in all the major polls, they can get everybody.” pic.twitter.com/QpcxgG5p84

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 26, 2024

“Trump is the first President who has refused to follow the Constitution.”

Former chief ethics lawyer of the George W. Bush White House, Richard Painter, accused Trump of being the first President to disregard the Constitution regarding the transfer of power after the 2020 US election.

The comment did not go over well…

Richard Painter: “I am not going to participate in a debate when people are making things up.”

Alex Jones: “I don’t know where you found this dinosaur from 50 years ago that tells us George W. Bush — the war criminal — is a good guy.” pic.twitter.com/QtR1xgRYXv

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 26, 2024

Papadopoulos, meanwhile, offered an international perspective in favor of Trump – who he says keept US adversaries at bay. The former Trump adviser attributes this to siloing Russian exports and increasing NATO funding — while unleashing “the shale renaissance in the United States.”

Tracey hit back – arguing that such moves were in fact escalatory:

“Go read Putin’s speech before he launched the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, he cites multiple grievances with the U.S. administration, and half of them are to do with Trump… He hyper escalated tensions with Russia under the auspices of John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and all the other hard-liners.“

Papadopoulos: “[Trump] sanctioned Nord Stream to cut off the Russian economy from the Europeans…. He bolstered NATO’s defense spending… NATO members were committing to the 2% expenditure.”

Tracey: “It’s just not consistent with this idea that… he’s not getting us into wars.” pic.twitter.com/htdM9Rhd6z

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 26, 2024

Watch the full debate here and decide who won:

---

“This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” states surveillance watchdog..

The FBI demanded that Google turn over the identities of tens of thousands of users who watched certain YouTube videos.

Federal investigators obtained court-ordered subpoenas for any YouTube viewers who watched tutorials on mapping with drones and augmented reality software.

WTF pic.twitter.com/rKbaqHYnlz

— Karli Bonne’ ?? (@KarluskaP) March 26, 2024

The subpoena included names, addresses, telephone numbers, and browsing history for Google accounts for at least 30,000 people, tracing traffic to the relevant videos for the first week of January 2023.

The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos.

“There is reason to believe that these records would be relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation, including by providing identification information about the perpetrators,” the authorities claimed, according to Forbes.

Google was also told to keep the request secret until it was unsealed earlier this week. It’s unknown if Google complied with the subpoena.

But that wasn’t the only case of the FBI trampling on privacy rights.

From Forbes:

In another example, involving an investigation in New Hampshire, the Portsmouth Police received a threat from an unknown male that an explosive had been placed in a trashcan in a public area. The order says that after the police searched the area, they learned they were being watched over a YouTube live stream camera associated with a local business. Federal investigators believe similar events have happened across the U.S., where bomb threats were made and cops watched via YouTube.

They asked Google to provide a list of accounts that “viewed and/or interacted with” eight YouTube live streams and the associated identifying information during specific timeframes. That included a video posted by Boston and Maine Live, which has 130,000 subscribers. Mike McCormack, who set up the company behind the account, IP Time Lapse, said he knew about the order, adding that they related “to swatting incidents directed at the camera views at that time.”

Google issued a statement assuring users that it protects their privacy.

“With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” said Google spokesperson Matt Bryant.

“We examine each demand for legal validity, consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back against overbroad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, including objecting to some demands entirely.”

Privacy experts contended that the FBI’s move was unconstitutional because it violated the 1st Amendment’s free speech protections and freedom from unreasonable searches outlined in the 4th Amendment.

“This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” said Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. “No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up. I’m horrified that the courts are allowing this.”

Electronic Privacy Information Center’s senior counsel John Davisson echoed that sentiment and pointed out the FBI’s request disregarded probable cause.

“What we watch online can reveal deeply sensitive information about us—our politics, our passions, our religious beliefs, and much more,” said Davisson.

“It’s fair to expect that law enforcement won’t have access to that information without probable cause. This order turns that assumption on its head.”

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds