Leftists Call on Biden to Drone Strike Trump in Wake of Supreme Court Immunity Ruling
Deranged leftists panicked over Monday’s Supreme Court presidential immunity ruling reacted by calling on Joe Biden to order an assassination on former President Donald Trump.
Incensed by the decision throwing Special Counsel Jack Smith’s classified documents case against Trump into question, leftists on social media urged Biden to take advantage of the SCOTUS decision by immediately declaring himself a dictator and launching military action against the former president.
Masks are off pic.twitter.com/LTfcroLxLS
— BowTiedRanger (@BowTiedRanger) July 1, 2024
“The Supreme Court just gave Biden unequivocal immunity to order the military to take action against Trump,” claimed liberal lawyer Bradley P. Moss on X.
The Supreme Court just gave Biden unequivocal immunity to order the military to take action against Trump.
Today. Right now.— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) July 1, 2024
“The Supreme Court just ruled that a president can have the military execute them and the president is immune from prosecution for it,” Moss added in an update.
The Supreme Court just ruled that a president can have the military execute them and the president is immune from prosecution for it.
— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) July 1, 2024
“I strongly encourage Joe Biden to take advantage of his absolute immunity — which he has been lawfully granted by Trump’s Supreme Court Justices — to do whatever ‘official acts’ he needs to do in order to prevent Donald Trump from becoming President,” suggested pro-Biden political commentator Dash Dobrofsky.
I strongly encourage Joe Biden to take advantage of his absolute immunity — which he has been lawfully granted by Trump’s Supreme Court Justices — to do whatever ‘official acts’ he needs to do in order to prevent Donald Trump from becoming President.
— Dash Dobrofsky (@DashDobrofsky) July 1, 2024
Left-leaning lawyer Max Kennerly went further, tweeting a photoshop of last week’s New York Times headline calling on Biden to “leave the race.”
In full compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling. pic.twitter.com/1lRJJ5cqHO
— Max Kennerly (@MaxKennerly) July 1, 2024
Leftist writer Aaron Rupar asked if the ruling meant Biden could imprison Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.
“If President Biden declared today’s Supreme Court ruling to be an assault on democracy and ordered Chief Justice John Roberts imprisoned indefinitely, would that be an ‘official act?’” Rupar asked.
if President Biden declared today’s Supreme Court ruling to be an assault on democracy and ordered Chief Justice John Roberts imprisoned indefinitely, would that be an “official act?”
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 1, 2024
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor touched on the possibility a president immune from criminal liability for “official” acts could order military action against a rival, insinuating Trump could retaliate against Biden if restored to office.
The President of the United States is the most powerful person in the country, and possibly the world. When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution. Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military dissenting coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune. Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be. That is the majority’s message today.
Following Biden’s abysmal debate performance last Thursday, Democrats had been calling to swap him out for another candidate, however, it appears the TDS-suffering left is comfortable with Biden staying in power if he uses presidential immunity to destroy Trump.
The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!
Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.
Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.
HECKENLIVELY: The Biden Administration Pressured Amazon To Censor Two Of My Books On Vaccines
When I saw a recent post from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, reading, “In response to a subpoena from @Judiciary GOP, @Amazon revealed the 43 book titles it censored because of the Biden White House’s pressure,” I clicked the link out of curiosity.
Imagine my surprise when I found two of my books on the list: Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth About Human Retroviruses, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases, as well as Inoculated: How Science Lost Its Soul in Autism. What was even more startling was that they’d twice listed Plague — for the original 2014 hardcover and the 2017 paperback.
They must really hate that book.
As Jordan tweeted, “Whether you love or hate the books on this list, no bookstore should be censoring books because of government power.”
One of the wild things about their censorship of that thick, 417-page book is that it takes the position that many chronic diseases are the result of immune exhaustion due to long-term, low-level viral infection of a recently discovered retrovirus, known as XMRV. The book was not an anti-virus book and had in fact been authored with a 20-year government scientist, Dr. Judy Mikovits, known for her work in virology.
The book was abundantly sourced with hundreds of footnotes.
Watch New York Times bestselling author Kent Heckenlively’s previous appearances on Infowars below.
VIDEO: Eisenhower’s Forgotten Warning with Author Kent Heckenlively
New Book Exposes Real Life Vampiric Globalist Elites
Big Rig Hauling More Than 60 Migrants Busted Near Southern Border
Authorities discovered more than 60 migrants hiding in a big rig near the U.S.-Mexico border over the weekend.
The bust unfolded on Saturday at a highway checkpoint in the town of Samalayuca, which lies roughly 25 miles south of Ciudad Juarez.
Officials inspected a suspicious soft-top trailer and found 63 U.S.-bound migrants from Central and South America and the Caribbean crammed inside.
The National Migration Institute (INM) reported “overcrowded conditions and high temperatures” inside the cargo area.
“During the review, the Federal Migration Agents (AFM) identified that the migrants were moving irregularly and are from Guatemala (18); Ecuador (23); El Salvador (6); Dominican Republic (2); Honduras (5); as well as three family units with two members each from Guatemala, Honduras and Ecuador.”
#Comunicado ? En una acción conjunta con fuerzas federales, @INAMI_mx #Chihuahua ubicó a 63 personas extranjeras que viajaban en condiciones de hacinamiento en la caja de un camión de carga; fueron ubicados en el poblado desértico de #Samalayuca.
— INM (@INAMI_mx) June 30, 2024
? https://t.co/hrEAeaScjl pic.twitter.com/Y9PiAOx1M3
While most of the migrants were determined to be single adults, three were identified as ‘unaccompanied minors.’
The single adults were taken to immigration facilities for processing while the children and family units were transferred to agencies responsible for handling such cases.
Days prior, the INM announced the apprehensions of 84 migrants from China, India, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.
The migrants, who were presumably hoping to reach the U.S., were encountered under unspecified circumstances in the municipality of Cuautitlán Izcalli.
#Comunicado ?| @INAMI_mx atendió a 84 personas migrantes en Cuautitlán Izcalli, eran originarias de China, India, Centro, Sudamérica y el Caribe, viajaban de manera irregular y previamente habían sido rescatadas por agentes de seguridad estatal y federal.https://t.co/1aOCF8F5zF pic.twitter.com/0GpYqianiD
— INM (@INAMI_mx) June 27, 2024
Authorities in Mexico and the U.S. frequently find trailers packed with migrants, some of whom don’t survive the perilous journey.
Jack Posobiec joins Alex Jones live in-studio to give his expert analysis of the state of the union.
.jpg?itok=2mp802U3 "Trump Says Immunity Ruling ‘Big Win For Democracy’")
Trump Says Immunity Ruling ‘Big Win For Democracy’
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in a 6-3 vote that former presidents, including Trump, enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct involving official acts during tenure in office, but he’s not immune from unofficial acts.
As Bloomberg notes, the decision – which kicks the ball back to the lower court – ‘all but ensures’ that a trial won’t happen in Trump’s classified documents case before the November election.
The justices, voting 6-3 along ideological lines, said a federal appeals court was too categorical in rejecting Trump’s immunity arguments, ruling for the first time that former presidents are shielded from prosecution for some official acts taken while in office. The majority ordered the lower courts to revisit the case to decide the extent of the allegations that are off limits to prosecution.
“Just as former presidents have immunity from civil liability for official acts, they have immunity from criminal prosecution unless they are impeached and removed from office for the crime alleged. This decision is supported by the writings of the framers of the Constitution, the text of the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent,” wrote X user Martin Harry.
As constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley notes, now “the issue is whether what constitutes official acts,” adding that the ruling will “further delay the lower court proceedings, but Trump will have to argue that his actions fall within these navigational beacons.”
“The lower court judge has been highly favorable for Jack Smith in the past. Yet the court is arguing that there is a presumption of immunity for their official acts beyond the absolute immunity on core constitutional powers.”
…”The question then becomes whether that presumption of immunity is rebutted under the circumstances. When the Vice President presides over the January 6 certification proceeding, he does so in his capacity as President of the Senate. “
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) July 1, 2024
KEY PARAGRAPH: “Taking into account these competing considerations, the Court concludes that the separation of powers principles explicated in the Court’s precedent necessitate at least a presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for a President’s acts within the outer… https://t.co/Ux5gGq8EsY
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) July 1, 2024
Meanwhile, Justice Thomas called into question the legality of Smith’s office:
Justice Thomas’ concurrence in Trump v. U.S. is hugely significant. He questions whether Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office is constitutional.
— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) July 1, 2024
“If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private…
Justice Thomas launches a legal missile at AG Merrick Garland:
— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) July 1, 2024
“It is difficult to see how the Special Counsel has an office ‘established by Law,’ as required by the Constitution”
“…None of the statutes cited by the Attorney General appears to create an office for the… pic.twitter.com/J0b4eSNaik
In a blistering dissent, Justice Sotomayor writes that the ruling “makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”
“Relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom… the court gives former President trump all the immunity he asked for and more.“
Justice Sotomayor’s dissent warning is unlike anything I’ve ever seen in a Supreme Court opinion https://t.co/eXkFnckIY7 pic.twitter.com/kNNbde5WzE
— Neal Katyal (@neal_katyal) July 1, 2024
Special counsel Jack Smith is leading two federal probes against Trump, both of which led to criminal charges. In Washington, Trump has been targeted over alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election, while a Florida case revolves around the mishandling of classified documents – for which Trump has claimed presidential immunity.
In response to the ruling, Trump said on Truth Social that it was a “”BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY.”
It’s a massive Trump W. Presumptive immunity for official acts.
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) July 1, 2024
No J6 trial in DC before the election, absolutely no chance.
Trump Supreme Court Immunit… by Zerohedge
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World
Two Years Ago Alex Jones Revealed the Democrat Plan to Dump Biden
Two years before Uncle Joe’s ill-fated debate against Donald Trump, Alex Jones announced that the Democrat establishment is seeking to dump the ice cream loving old man.
“They are moving Joe Biden out the door,” Jones said in 2022.
Don’t miss:
Alex Jones Exposed American Concentration Camps for 3 Decades
Breaking! SCOTUS Ruling On Presidential Immunity Delivers Trump Victory, Blow To Crooked Jack Smith
The United States Supreme Court on Monday issued a 6-3 ruling that former presidents have total immunity from prosecution for any official presidential acts, but do not have immunity for any unofficial acts.
The court stated:
“The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution. And the system of separated powers designed by the Framers has always demanded an energetic, independent Executive. The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party.”
The justices also ordered lower courts to now apply their decision to the Donald Trump immunity case being led by special prosecutor Jack Smith.
Conservatives are calling the decision a victory, but some leftist legal analysts appear to believe there is still room for the lower courts to rule against the former president.
TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk wrote on X, “SCOTUS has ruled that Trump is immune from criminal prosecution in Trump v. United States. The Court holds that a former president has absolute immunity regarding his core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for all official acts. A huge blow for Jack Smith.”
BREAKING: SCOTUS has ruled that Trump is immune from criminal prosecution in Trump v. United States. The Court holds that a former president has absolute immunity regarding his core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for all official acts.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 1, 2024
A huge blow for Jack Smith.
Meanwhile, CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen wrote, “SCOTUS immunity decision is out & they have REJECTED Trump’s outlandish absolute immunity demand Instead they have established a test that his attempted coup cannot meet, back to D.C. for a mini trial.”
BREAKING: SCOTUS immunity decision is out & they have REJECTED Trump’s outlandish absolute immunity demand
— Norm Eisen (#TryingTrump out now!) (@NormEisen) July 1, 2024
Instead they have established a test that his attempted coup cannot meet, back to D.C. for a mini trial
As I explain in this piece ?https://t.co/A4v56pcWcZ
It seems as if Trump’s fate in regards to the presidential immunity case lies in the hands of the rigged D.C. court system that will now decide whether or not Trump was acting in his “official” capacity as president on January 6, 2021.
Click the image below to see the entire SCOTUS ruling: