Report exposes FBI program to STAGE neo-Nazi rallies in US
The Orlando neo-Nazi rally that grabbed headlines in 2006 was organized by the FBI, a new report shows, and it was part of a broader program that organized similar rallies throughout the nation – even though the bureau knew that they would cause more people to join the movement.
The report claims the Nazi rallies organized by the FBI are what eventually paved the way for a bigger operation known as Primitive Affliction that targeted right-wing groups, complete with bomb makers, rogue undercover agents and a motorcycle front group.
Higher-ups at the bureau were well aware of the operation, including former director Robert Mueller, documents studied by journalist Ken Silva of Headline USA show.
They explain how when the FBI source in charge of organizing the 2006 neo-Nazi rally in Orlando, David Gletty, had his cover blown, his handler denied that he organized the rally on several occasions, admitting only that he marched in it while insisting he didn’t lead it. However, Gletty himself said that he did organize it at the behest of the FBI, both in order to raise Gletty’s profile within neo-Nazi circles and to facilitate surveillance by the FBI of rally attendees.
According to Gletty, this was part of the FBI’s modus operandi at the time, staging similar rallies throughout the U.S. to raise the profile of individual informants and develop a database of Nazis they could track.
Other members of the National Socialist Movement (NSM) have corroborated claims that the FBI staged neo-Nazi rallies in the mid-2000s. One of them is Bill White, who claims that the FBI sponsored a violent 2005 rally held in Toledo.
In a sworn declaration, he stated: “In October 2005, FBI [confidential human source] Jeff Schoep asked me to go to Toledo, Ohio, to help organize a ‘March Against Black Crime’ by what were supposed to be ‘local residents,’ but were really federal CHSs.”
His statement was referring to Jeff Schoep, who was the leader of NSM from the 1990s until not long after the Charlottesville rally in 2017. Although there is no evidence definitively showing that Schoep served as a full-fledged FBI informant while heading the movement, FBI records show that he did speak to agents on at least one occasion, and he has been accused by many other neo-Nazis of working with the FBI. Adding fuel to the fire is the fact he now openly works as a “reformed Nazi” alongside groups sponsored by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.
FBI let neo-Nazis and left-wing counter-protesters clash
White also said that the rally in Toledo followed a similar formula to the one in Charlottesville, with local police and the FBI letting neo-Nazis and left-wing counter-protesters clash instead of making efforts to keep them apart.
He explained: “On the day of the march, the Toledo Police and the FBI occupied [a nearby parking lot] and ordered myself and the NSM to use [another] parking lot. I and a small team from the NSM arrived before the Communists to secure the location; no police were present at this time ….”
“About an hour later, police began to deploy and directed NSM members to enter [their parking lot] by driving through the mob. This started problems … After the police line formed, the mob then attacked the police, not us,” he added.
A report by the FBI about the Toledo rally tells almost an identical story, although it conveniently leaves out the fact that law enforcement didn’t keep the opposing groups apart.
“Local residents and counter-demonstrators continued with the clash with the police, looting a store and setting fire to a local bar. This rally and riot, and the attendant media coverage for the NSM, was deemed a great success by the majority of the white supremacy movement,” the report said.
However, one of the most damning parts of the report was in the conclusion: “NSM reported increased fundraising and increased applications for membership immediately following these events.”
In other words, whether the FBI was fully responsible for staging the Toledo rally or not, it was well aware that such events led to jumps in the number of neo-Nazis in the U.S. when it enlisted Gletty to organize the one in Orlando a year later.
According to White, the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force was responsible for arranging violent counter-demonstrations against neo-Nazi rallies via other informants. He said that “the federal government was using the rallies to make it appear as if there was a ‘domestic terror threat’ when no such threat existed.”
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
VIDEO: Putin says he Believes Trump is Sincere About Ending Ukraine War
On Tuesday Alex Jones broke down statements by Vladimir Putin regarding Trump being serious about ending the Ukraine war.
Don’t miss:
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Left Retains Power in France After Huge Comeback in Second Round of Election
(LifeSiteNews) — The second round of elections for the French National Assembly – the lower chamber of Parliament but the one that wields the most power – was set to offer a near-landslide victory to the only party that can be loosely described as “anti-establishment,” the National Rally.
After unprecedented totals in the first round in which the party obtained the highest percentage nationwide – 29.26 percent and nearly 9,380,000 votes– it was expected to come close to an absolute majority in the 577-member National Assembly.
After the playoffs on Sunday, where the candidate who comes in first wins, the National Rally (RN) ended up with only 125 seats while a left-wing coalition, the New Popular Front, including the Communist Party and the radical left-wing party “La France insoumise” (France Unbowed), acquired 180 seats, meaning the coalition represents the largest political force in the Assembly.
The first lesson of this unprecedented political event in contemporary France is indeed the way in which the National Rally was bereft of a larger victory, leaving a highway open to the left and extreme left.
And it wasn’t only the French electoral system. It is true that if France had a “first-past-the-post” ballot like the UK, the National Rally would have won outright alone with no less than 297 seats – the number of constituencies where it came in first last week, eight more than the majority. French President Emmanuel Macron would have had to make 28-year-old Jordan Bardella, the party’s leader, the country’s prime minister, and an uneasy “cohabitation” between the globalist head of state and Bardella would have ensued.
However, only 37 candidates from the patriotic National Rally won in the first round, and several hundred were expected to come in first in the second round, especially in those places where three candidates would be able to stay in the race after gaining a minimum percentage.
What happened to prevent this was a manipulation of the system – not in any way illegal but totally untrue to reality. The RN, together with a few dozen allies from the center-right Républicains, was faced with two large coalitions: the New Popular Front (a throwback to the left-wing Front Populaire in the 1930s) that included the Communists, radical leftists, socialists and what remains of the ecologists, and “Ensemble” (together), with Macron’s Renaissance party as its pivot, and the rest of the Républicains as a supporting party.
Whirlwind agreements were concluded by both coalitions leading to the voluntary stepping down of a large number of candidates who came in third and who theoretically could have stayed in the race in places where the RN had come in first, giving the latter a good chance of victory.
This “Front Républicain,” or Republican Front, made sure that many RN candidates would find themselves pitted against just one other candidate, supported not only by the radical left and the Macronist “center” but by all the mainstream media and innumerable public celebrities, trendsetters, football players and virtue-signalers.
The strategy worked beyond anything the media and opinion pollsters had forecast. While abstention figures did not grow in this election that saw over 67 percent of voters actually casting their ballots — something that hadn’t happened in decades — left-wingers who routinely decry Macron as a “powdered Jupiter” and a man who despises the ordinary workers, the “people who are nothing” as he once publicly said, voted for his representatives.
Affluent, town-dwelling progressives who have no interest at all in the left’s push for even higher taxation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s record-holding champion of compulsory tax and social contribution levies (46 percent of the GDP) voted for extreme leftist candidates from LFI (France Unbowed). The latter was quick to claim victory on Sunday evening although as a party it only won 75 seats against its largest rival in the New Popular Front, the socialist party with its 66 seats, one being for former President François Hollande.
When Sunday’s vote is broken down, however, the Marine Le Pen and Bardella’s National Rally appears as France’s single largest party by far. It obtained the highest number of votes in the second round nationwide with nearly 8,750,000, or 32,05 percent, doing better than in the first round, although it was competing in fewer constituencies because it had already won 37. On average, the RN needed about 90,000 votes to obtain one seat, the other groups needed only 40,000 to 45,000.
What would have changed if the National Rally had not been ousted in this way? Obtaining power and the right to govern in the current difficult circumstances would not necessarily have been a boon: France is deeply fractured, and it has also been plunged into a spectacularly increased national debt by Macron and his team. The public debt now represents 110 percent of the GDP, France’s credit rating is floundering, and it takes more than what income tax is able to garner each year to pay the interest on the debt. Paying for COVID benefits during lockdowns is just one explanation. Public spending has been higher than income for years and is getting worse. It represents 60 percent of the gross domestic product; far from being a liberal, Macron presides over a predominantly socialist economy.
Despite this dire situation, infighting within the New Popular Front (LFI) has already begun with Jean-Luc Mélenchon as head of LFI clamoring to become prime minister with his promises of unbridled social and “climate spending, while the more moderate left-wingers such as the socialist reject his extreme policies. The centrist “Ensemble” movement hopes to obtain support on both sides of the political spectrum in order to impose a prime minister and government from its ranks. If that happens, Macron’s chess game can be said to have worked, although the structure of the National Assembly has now reached a situation where obtaining majority votes for new bills will become difficult indeed.
Macron’s chess game consisted in dissolving the National Assembly, as is his right, when his party dismally lost the European elections earlier in June. What he wanted was unclear: to gain a true majority he had lost two years ago after his reelection as president? To force the RN into power prematurely in the hope it would burn its wings in the face of the electorate?
Whatever his game, the RN has been laminated in a way that contradicts its nationwide support and success, and his party can play pivot among France’s renewed lawmakers.
Macron’s responsibility in giving the left and extreme left a much larger platform and extra power is one thing that cannot be contradicted. He took the deliberate risk to do so and he made things worse by creating an alliance with the New Popular Front, rejecting the RN as “extremist” with no precise reasons given, and offering a highway to communist and Trotskyist parties at least 100 million deaths caused directly by Communism and who want even more public spending, taxation, abortion, state interference, gender ideology, and mass immigration. It is true that they are promoting the same thing as the centrist liberals but only worse.
It should come as no surprise that up to 48 percent of young people are already voting LFI and that this vote is particularly high in ethnic suburbs. The future is already visible there.
Against this background, the National Rally has its failings, not least the fact that over half of its former 88 National Assembly members voted in favor of the enshrinement of the “freedom” to abort in the French constitution last March. But it does speak clearly on immigration policy and has a patriotic approach to what France stands for, at a point in time where so many ordinary people are feeling overwhelmed by energy prices, the rising cost of living and a general feeling of counting for nothing in the eyes of the so-called “elites.”
Macron has made France ungovernable. For the time being, he has reconducted his own youthful (and openly homosexual) Prime Minister Gabriel Attal for such time as will be needed to “ensure the country’s stability.” Coming from the man who gave a great kick in the anthill by dissolving the National Assembly, this is indeed akin to high art. Macron has already stated that he will do so again as soon as constitutional rules allow: one year from now.
Meanwhile, voices have already been raised, such as François Hollande, to say that one of the most urgent political moves at hand will be to relaunch the euthanasia debate that was cut short by Macron’s dissolution.
In that respect, nothing has changed.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
A Growing Number of Russians Approve the Use of Nuclear Weapons in Ukraine
A growing number of Russians are expressing readiness to support Vladimir Putin’s potential use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. According to recent surveys by the Levada Centre, approximately 34 percent of respondents – slightly more than one in three – would either definitely or likely approve of the use of nuclear arms in the conflict.
This marks a significant increase of five percent from a year ago and represents the highest level of support since Putin initiated his controversial military campaign against Ukraine.
The findings reveal a nuanced spectrum of public opinion, with 31 percent firmly against the use of nuclear weapons and an additional 21 percent leaning toward opposition. This upward trend in support for nuclear options is widely attributed to effective messaging from Russian propagandists seeking to rally nationalistic sentiments in favor of such drastic measures.
Putin orders tactical nuclear missile drills
Recent developments have seen Vladimir Putin ordering tactical nuclear missile drills across Russia and in neighboring Belarus, where significant deployments of atomic weaponry have been orchestrated. These maneuvers are part of broader strategic initiatives, potentially involving a revision of Russia’s nuclear doctrine to facilitate more flexible and preemptive use of nuclear capabilities.
(Related: Russian insider Viktor Bout says nuclear WWIII is IMMINENT.)
In parallel with these military exercises, which coincide with geopolitical transitions such as recent changes in leadership in Britain, Russia’s defense forces are actively conducting large-scale nuclear missile drills.
These exercises, including the deployment of Yars missile crews in regions like Irkutsk and Ivanovo, showcase Russia’s capability to swiftly mobilize and demonstrate readiness in response to perceived threats.
Russia’s Ministry of Defense (MoD) has underscored that these drills are part of multi-phased exercises involving tactical nuclear weapons, coordinated closely with Belarusian counterparts.
Activities include electronic missile launches, naval patrols and ground troop movements aimed at simulating real-world scenarios and ensuring operational preparedness.
The heightened military activities and shifting public sentiment reflect a tense geopolitical environment, exacerbated by ongoing international sanctions and diplomatic tensions.
As Russia continues to assert its strategic interests in the region, these developments underscore the volatile nature of current global security dynamics.
According to reports from Interfax and Reuters, the crews operating Yars missile launchers in at least two different regions were tasked with relocating over 100 kilometers (62 miles) and practicing maneuvers such as camouflage and deployment. The ministry also indicated that similar exercises would be conducted by other missile units shortly.
Footage released by the military showcased a mobile launcher navigating forested roads and assuming concealed positions under camouflage to avoid detection.
The earlier tactical nuclear drills held in late May were justified by the MoD as a response to what it deemed as provocative statements and threats from certain Western officials.
This included reported discussions among U.S. and U.K. officials advocating for Ukrainian offensives on Russian territory, purportedly supported by U.S.-supplied weaponry.
Among the concerns raised by Moscow from Western quarters is the prospect of NATO troops being stationed in Ukraine, a proposal initially broached by French President Emmanuel Macron earlier in the year at a security conference in Paris.
Strategic show of strength ahead of NATO summit
These recent nuclear drills with mobile launchers are viewed as a demonstration of readiness and a strategic show of strength ahead of the upcoming NATO summit scheduled from July 9 to 11 in Washington D.C.
The potential accession of Ukraine into NATO is anticipated to be a pivotal topic at the summit, which Moscow perceives as a critical red-line issue.
Despite the U.S. advocating for a pathway for Ukraine’s future NATO membership, a recent letter published by Politico, signed by numerous foreign policy experts, cautions against precipitous promises, arguing that such commitments could escalate tensions and prolong the conflict with Russia.
In essence, these military maneuvers underscore Russia’s stance on regional security and its assertive response to perceived threats from Western geopolitical strategies, especially concerning Ukraine and NATO.
Head over to NuclearWar.news for updates on possible escalations of worldwide conflicts into a nuclear war.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
George Papadopoulos Warns the Deep State is Selling America out to Communist China & Russia
On the Tuesday show Alex Jones spoke with George Papadopoulos about the future collapse of America.
Don’t miss:
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Meta Tightens the Reins on Anti-‘Zionist’ Terminology
Meta, the owner of both Facebook and Instagram, has taken a further stance in censoring content that uses the term “Zionists,” particularly in a way that conflates the term with Jewish or Israeli identities.
Previously, the term was tightly regulated only in very explicit instances. However, the revised guidelines now include a broader array of phrases where neither “Jew” nor “Israeli” are specifically mentioned, signaling a significant shift in policy.
The impetus for this policy enhancement came in the aftermath of the attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023. This event has catalyzed several changes in Meta’s content moderation practices.
In defining “Zionist” usage, Meta acknowledges the complexity of the term, which is often employed in political discourse about Israel and its policies. While Zionism is historically linked to the Jewish movement advocating for a sovereign state in the Middle East, Meta is arguing that its current usage on social platforms can sometimes extend to implicit or explicit antisemitism and has expanded its censorship policies.
According to a blog post from Meta, content that attacks “Zionists” under antisemitic pretenses will now be removed. This includes insinuations of global control or comparisons to animals.
Meta announced that it is also waiting on its Oversight Board to offer guidance on whether to allow comparisons between proxy terms for nationality (including Zionists) and criminals (e.g., “Zionists are war criminals.”).
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) has applauded Meta for its decision to treat the inappropriate usage of the term “Zionist” as a substitute for “Jews” as antisemitic Tier 1 “hate speech.”
World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder stated, “Meta’s decision is a much-needed advancement in our ongoing fight against online antisemitism and hatred. By recognizing and addressing the misuse of the term ‘Zionist,’ Meta is taking a bold stand against those who seek to mask their hatred of Jews.”
“We appreciate that Meta has truly listened to the voices of Jewish communities that we work with. This policy change will help create a safer, more respectful online environment for everyone. I hope all other platforms will follow Meta’s leadership and take similar action,” added Lauder.
Prior to the policy revision, 73 groups formally expressed their concerns to Meta through a letter. They argued that expanding the policy could improperly label discussions on Zionists—and consequently, Zionism—as inherently antisemitic. They emphasized that equating “Zionist” with antisemitism could mistakenly merge legitimate critiques of Israeli government actions with hate speech.
“This move will prohibit Palestinians from sharing their daily experiences and histories with the world, be it a photo of the keys to their grandparents’ house lost when attacked by Zionist militias in 1948, or documentation and evidence of genocidal acts in Gaza over the past few months, authorized by the Israeli Cabinet, which includes members of the Religious Zionist Party,” the letter read. “And it would prevent Jewish users from discussing their relationships to Zionist political ideology.”
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now