News

President Biden exhibits obvious signs of severe Parkinson’s disease dementia, a top neurosurgeon has claimed. The medical expert, who chose to remain anonymous, gave confirmation of the Biden’s diagnosis in an email to journalist Alex Berenson, saying […]

The post Top Neurosurgeon: ‘Biden Definitely Has Parkinson’s Disease Dementia’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Politicians are inclined to include job-creation programs in their promises because they are often popular with voters.

For quite a considerable amount of time, the topics of job creation and unemployment have been central to every political campaign in almost every country. It hasn’t been without good reason, either, since job security is one of the most important factors in someone’s career. Therefore, a candidate who can promise to create more jobs and sustain job growth would appear on paper to be the better candidate. However, there are few policies that promote greater havoc than job-creation programs. This should not be a surprise since the state is ultimately not responsible for financing jobs, so it need not worry about profit or loss.

Politicians are inclined to include job-creation programs in their promises because they are often popular with voters. After all, if there are more jobs in the economy, unemployment will be lower, and there is a greater likelihood that workers in the country will not fall on hard times. Since nearly every household has a member of their family who works, job-creation programs have nearly universal appeal. If a politician can position themselves as a job creator, they garner a massive boost toward their odds of being elected. Thus, they all aim to one-up each other with what they promise to voters. Unfortunately, in this case, competition does not lead to better results.

It is not proper to think a politician creates jobs in the same way an entrepreneur does. An entrepreneur risks his time, effort, and capital to run a business to serve consumers and turn a profit. Entrepreneurs seek to profit by providing value to consumers. For them to succeed in their venture, they must hire workers to contribute to their projects. When a business venture is started, jobs are created as workers help the business to facilitate value to the consumers. In the free market, jobs are created because resources, including labor, are used efficiently to create value in the economy.

The same is not true when a job-creation program is pushed through by politicians. There are only a few ways in which politicians can create jobs. Most of these efforts include the subsidization of certain businesses or by inducing regulation with the hope of it leading to more jobs. The former is a particularly terrible way of promoting business as it requires the state to fund the program. Ultimately, this means that taxpayers bear the brunt of having to subsidize businesses that the state deems appropriate to receive funding. Effectively, the state steals from its citizens and gives the money to a firm with a good political standing with the hope that the firm will create jobs. This is in stark contrast to the way jobs are created via the free market as the state does not really need to prove that value is generated for consumers. It only needs to prove that jobs increased as a result of state funding. By getting involved, the state lowers the efficiency of resource utilization.

The same is true when regulation is induced with the intent of job creation. A prominent example commonly used by politicians nowadays is tariffs. Tariffs are levied with the hope that domestic industry will thrive as foreign competitors are priced out of the market. While this may boost jobs, protectionist policy has significantly greater negative impacts on the economy of a country. By levying tariffs, consumers are forced to pay higher prices, often for inferior products. This lowers their standard of living and leaves them with less disposable income to spend on other needs or wants. However, these unintended consequences are never mentioned because politicians have no wish to demonstrate that their jobs are of negative value.

For circumstances to improve, we must realize that wanting the state to create jobs leads to disastrous results and does not make economic sense. Such attempts are only made now because they are politically popular. Real progress can be made only by asking the state to reduce their interference in the lives of citizens who are then allowed to work toward a better future for themselves. We would be better off if our politicians did less rather than more. Thus, we should ask for them to get out of the way rather than stand in the way.

---

MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World

---

The good news is that there are many things we can do. Some of these solutions may sound extreme or inconvenient.

In my previous articles, we looked at the global war on farmers, the organizations pushing for the Great Food Reset, the tactics used to foist these changes on the public, the projects underway to remove your access to healthy, farm-fresh foods, the mRNA, RNA, and DNA gene therapies entering our food supply, and how the One Health agenda threatens to destroy both food freedom and medical freedom. 

So what can we do about it? 

The good news is that there are many things we can do. Some of these solutions may sound extreme or inconvenient. But I am guessing many of you chose wildly inconvenient and deeply courageous paths to protect yourselves, your families, and your patients during the Covid psyop, and to avoid being injected with mRNA shots. The substances you take in through your digestive tract can be just as harmful as those that come through a needle.

Do not give in. Do not comply. Do not take the convenient route. It leads to serfdom.

1. Get involved. Start speaking up about this issue to the people around you.
2. Stop eating processed foods. They are an addictive poison and only becoming more poisonous.
3. Join the movement to defund and disband the USDA, the FDA, and your state’s Department of Agriculture. Support bills that limit their power.
4. Abandon the grocery store. At a minimum, aim to spend at least 50% of your food budget on food direct from local farms.
5. Find local farms whose husbandry practices meet your requirements. Tour the farm and ask questions – what pesticides do you use? Do you vaccinate your animals? Are your cows 100% grass-fed? Where do you source your feed grains? Do you put any additives in your raw milk, and do you process your own meat? What chemicals are used in your meat processing? When you find a compatible farm, aim to purchase as much of your food as possible from them. You can find local farms at localharvest.org or through a local chapter of the Weston A Price Foundation. If you can’t find compatible farms locally, you can find farms that will deliver to your area at FarmMatch.com.
6. Support raw milk farmers in your state, and defend their right to produce it, even if you don’t personally drink raw milk. The government bureaucrats view raw milk as the tip of the food freedom spear and believe that if they lose the battle against raw milk, they could lose the food freedom battle entirely. Let’s prove them right. If you want to find a local source of raw milk, visit getrawmilk.com.
7. Build a local parallel society of like-minded people committed to supporting local food producers and looking out for each other in the challenging times ahead. This is crucial! When the truly hard times hit, it is too late to begin building community. Develop and strengthen your social bonds now, particularly in your local area.
8. Vote with your wallet while you still have that option. Use cash when you can to prevent your purchases from being tracked and used against you. If your local farmer will take payment in non-fiat currency, even better.
9. When a retail central bank digital currency launches and cash is phased out, or when states begin to crack down on food purchases that violate the planetary health paradigm, we’re going to need to be ready to transact in alternate currencies. It’s time to start brainstorming and testing payments in cryptocurrencies, pre-1965 silver quarters and dimes (known as junk silver), or by barter. Be creative and get started now. 
10. Plant your own garden. Study permaculture. It’s a lot easier to ramp up an existing garden with the knowledge you have gained from years of trial and error than it is to start from scratch when you really need it.
11. Create your own seed vault of heirloom, non-GMO seeds. You can buy them or save seeds from your garden every year. Buy heirloom seeds from trustworthy sources like True Leaf Market.
12. Get your own backyard chickens and find a local trustworthy feed source. Ask your local pastured chicken farmer where he gets his feed, or if he’s willing to sell some to you.
13. Buy a large freezer if you can and stock up on frozen fruits and vegetables from farmers you can trust during the growing season.
14. If you can’t afford a freezer, you can probably afford a couple of grow lights, seed-starting trays, organic potting soil, and seeds. Grow your own microgreens all winter for a small daily salad. They’re nutritious, taste good, and can be harvested in as little as a week. If you can’t afford that, get seeds and a sprout jar, and grow sprouts.
15. Don’t blindly trust USDA-inspected meat and eggs. It’s a deep rabbit hole you’re welcome to go down, but eggs are washed with chemicals that leave them porous – absorbing those chemicals like chlorine, ammonia, and peracetic acid – and then the eggs are coated with soybean oil, canola oil, or other toxic seed oils which also absorb into the egg white. Don’t see it on the label? Anything that’s an “industry standard” doesn’t need to be listed on the packaging. For meat, that means your beef, pork, goat, chicken, and turkey are soaked with peracetic acid, GMO citric acid, chlorine, lauric acid, or other chemicals. Many of these substances are banned for food use in Europe yet required here. Amish farmer Amos Miller’s battle with the USDA has largely been about his refusal to spray so-called citric acid on his meat, which the USDA mandates for chicken processed in their slaughterhouses unless you want to use bleach or peracetic acid. You’d be excused for thinking commercial citric acid comes from citrus fruit. Instead, it is made from black mold and GMO corn. It is manufactured in China and then sprayed on almost all meat sold in grocery stores in the United States. Black mold is a known allergen and likely causes autoimmune disease. If feasible, only get your meat from dissident farmers committed to pasture-raised, GMO-free, vaccine-free meat and poultry who process meat without chemical additives.
16. If you feel you can’t afford food like this, consider where your money is going, and if you can rearrange your priorities. It is possible you can barter labor for food with your local farmer. Be prepared to work hard. Also, recognize that the money you spend on truly nutritious food is money you won’t be spending later on medical bills. 
17. Constitutional sheriffs have played a key role in protecting farmers in several states when bureaucrats attempted to shut them down for selling raw milk and processing their own meat. If you live in a state that still recognizes the constitutional role of sheriffs, get to know your county’s sheriff and find out if he is willing to support the rights of local farms against state and federal agencies. If he is not, find someone to run against him who will. 
18. Call your congressman and senators to ask them to co-sponsor the PRIME Act. This bill would not fix everything, but it would remove many of the federal obstacles to pushing for agricultural reforms on a state and local level.
19. Spread the word to everyone you know about what is happening to our food supply. If we all refuse to comply, the scheme is guaranteed to fail.

We are at a crossroads: if we fight now, we can build a future where local farm-to-table networks feed us, and where we choose for ourselves what we want to put in our bodies. If we ignore the plan set out by the global elites for control of our bodies through diet, injections, and injunctions, we do so at great peril. Your health and your family’s health are at stake. Please join the movement to protect both medical freedom and food freedom, as we fight to hold fast to these fundamental rights for future generations.

---

MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World

---

There is no way to know what or when the next big victory for human liberty will be. But it’s important to not let that uncertainty undermine the fight.

Last week was an excellent week. On the night of Monday, June 24, news broke that Julian Assange had entered into a plea agreement with the United States government. Less than forty-eight hours later, after being in various forms of confinement for twelve years for publishing classified material the United States government didn’t want the public to know about, he landed in his home country of Australia as a free man.

After spending years working to get Assange extradited to the US to face charges that he violated the Espionage Act, the Department of Justice (DOJ) ran into a dilemma. The British High Court had ruled that they would send Assange to the US if Washington affirmed that he was entitled to the same free-speech protections as American citizens.

But US prosecutors were reluctant to do so. Not only had they built most of their entire case on the assumption that Assange did not have the right to free speech, but any conviction enshrining a foreigner’s free-speech rights would create a precedent that the US government was uncomfortable with.

So, the prosecutors said they were unwilling to make such a commitment. Out of concern that the British court would then drop the extradition case, along with anxiety within the Biden administration about the ongoing optics of prosecuting a man for journalism, the DOJ decided to work out the plea deal with Assange’s legal team. And, although he did have to plead guilty to one count of violating the Espionage Act, which is outrageous, the plea agreement has no impact on legal precedent.

That is a major loss for the American national security state who wanted Assange either in a cell for the rest of his life or dead to punish him for embarrassing them and to dissuade other journalists from trying anything similar.

Instead, Assange was able to go home, kiss his wife for the first time in five years, and hold his seven—and five-year-old sons for the first time ever.

More good news came on Friday when the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine. The ruling was a major blow to the administrative state and a significant victory for liberty.

To understand what the administrative state is and how the Chevron doctrine helped build it into the monstrosity we have today, we have to go back to its beginning. In the early 1880s, after a deranged man—who thought he deserved a job in James A. Garfield’s new administration because of his work on the campaign—shot and killed the president, Congress passed the Pendleton Act.

Before the act passed, when voters chose a new president, the new administration would appoint much of the staff of the various administrative agencies and bureaucracies that comprise the executive branch. The Pendleton Act, however, made it unlawful to fire or demote most of the employees who made up these agencies. The result was the class of unelected, unappointed bureaucrats who make up the permanent government or “deep state” that stays in power, regardless of who voters send to the White House.

This special class of bureaucrats grew more powerful over the next century, but the most consequential expansion of its power came in 1984. That year, in the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that whenever a dispute arose between citizens and an executive agency because of ambiguous language in legislation relating to the agency’s function, the courts are to defer to the agency’s interpretation of the law.

Because politicians are more interested in passing legislation that sounds good to voters—like bills simply making the air clean or keeping Americans safe from terrorism—than in being precise, this Chevron doctrine essentially lets federal agencies interpret laws however they’d like. The courts have no choice but to accept the agency’s interpretation.

Under this Chevron precedent, the administrative state ballooned into what we have today. There are dozens of agencies staffed with over two million unelected bureaucrats who can almost never be fired by the president, intervening in all aspects of our lives—be that warping the economy to benefit themselves and their friends in industry, imposing draconian restrictions on our lives and bodies in the name of public health, or forcing us to fund overt and covert interventions abroad that often blow up in their faces and put Americans in danger—all with the legal equivalent of a blank check authorizing almost everything they want to do. But as of Friday, that blank check is no more.

Disputes over the authority of federal agencies must now be settled in court. In the short term, that could call into question the legality of much that the federal government currently does. In the longer term, this ruling will transfer power from unelected to elected government officials and force Congress to be very specific and transparent when drafting regulations. The reversal of the Chevron doctrine alone is not enough to roll back the entire administrative state and all the destruction it causes, which will continue as long as the millions of federal bureaucrats remain unfireable. Still, it is an uncharacteristically massive step in the right direction.

What’s so striking about this pair of “wins” is how out of reach they felt up until the last moment. A week and a half ago, without knowing the internal concerns leading the DOJ to seek a plea deal or how the public outrage over the case was affecting the Biden administration, it was easy to imagine Assange’s extradition process dragging on indefinitely. Or to picture him dying in a high-security communications management unit the US government still appeared intent on sending him to. Instead, he was hours away from being home in Australia with his family.

Similarly, even though we knew the Supreme Court was slated to publish its Chevron ruling sometime soon and that it had been issuing a number of surprisingly solid rulings, it was hard to imagine they would overturn a precedent this critical to the power of the federal bureaucracy. Because despite how they’re portrayed by progressives in the media, most Republicans and establishment conservatives in DC are terrible at rolling back government power.

They may talk a good game when campaigning. But, at best, they tend to slightly slow the rate at which new regulations and interventions are implemented. The Supreme Court, being made up of political appointees, is usually no better. But, sure enough, the court came through and issued one of the most consequential rulings for American liberty in its 235-year history.

It’s easy to feel pessimistic when reflecting on the scope of institutional and social changes needed to fix the many problems facing the American people. And when every day seems to bring news about how much worse all these problems are getting, it’s natural to assume we will never see the end of them.

But weeks like last week should remind us that that’s not true. Good things happen. And often it’s hard to see them coming. Some of liberty’s biggest triumphs—such as the thirteen colonies’ secession from the British Empire, western civilization’s abolition of slavery, and the peaceful dissolution of the Soviet Union—all seemed impossible until, suddenly, they were inevitable.

There is no way to know what or when the next big victory for human liberty will be. But it’s important to not let that uncertainty undermine the fight. Because, for all we know, that victory could be right around the corner.

---

MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World

---

Creative Marketing Director Amit ‘Genie’ Gurnani also says Disney now creating its own Pride and LGBTQ projects in lieu of outside contractors.

A top marketing executive for Disney admitted to an undercover O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) journalist that its policy of exposing children to LGBTQ content is an “unspoken thing” in the company’s culture.

Disney’s Creative Marketing Director Amit “Genie” Gurnani, who also moonlights as a drag queen, told the OMG journalist that he’d love to see a drag queen be introduced in Disneyland soon.

“I’d love to get a drag queen at Disneyland,” he said, adding, “I’m sure that would happen at some point.”

BREAKING: ‘It’s the unspoken thing for children to see LGBTQ content,’ says Walt Disney’s Creative Marketing Director, Drag Queen Amit “Genie” Gurnani (@WishForGenie), into OMG’s hidden camera.

Gurnani adds, “I’d love to get a drag queen at Disneyland,” furthering, “I’m sure… pic.twitter.com/XSiYmJvjiy

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) July 3, 2024

The OMG journalist then told Gurnani he’d like kids “to see LGBTQ content” on the Disney platform.

“Yeah, of course. That’s the unspoken thing,” Gurnani said.

Gurnani then described his ambitions to expand the drag queen brand throughout Disney’s culture.

“Big current projects that will take up the rest of the four or five months will be Pride. We’ll have Pride campaigns across Disney and television,” he said, adding Disney has taken a “big step” in generating its own Pride campaign projects instead of contracting third parties to do that for them.

Gurnani went on to claim CEO Bob Iger “is not axing LGBTQ content at all” at the company despite cultural pushback, reflected by Disney’s introduction of DEI hiring policies and diversity-driven storylines.

This is the third installment of James O’Keefe’s Disney Tapes exposé, where he exposed how the company prioritizes racist “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” hiring practices against white men and ham-fists woke themes into storylines rather than focusing on creating quality wholesome content for young viewers.

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

‘When I am back in the White House, I will immediately end the Biden border nightmare…’

Human traffickers smuggling women and children at the behest of international drug cartels into the United States will face the death penalty under a new Donald Trump administration, the former president said.

Vowing to ramp up measures taken in his first term combatting human trafficking, Trump said he’ll redouble his efforts to secure the southern border and “end modern day slavery.”

?TRUMP TO RETURN ALL TRAFFICKED CHILDREN TO THEIR FAMILIES & GIVE ALL TRAFFICKERS THE DEATH PENALTY!

“I will use Title 42 to end the child trafficking crisis by returning all trafficked children to their families without delay

Share to amplify his AMAZING message! pic.twitter.com/9TFRCDcvJW

— Bo Loudon (@BoLoudon) July 2, 2024

“When I am back in the White House, I will immediately end the Biden border nightmare that traffickers are using to exploit vulnerable women and children,” Trump said. “We will fully secure the border. I will wage war on the cartels just as I destroyed the ISIS caliphate, 100 percent gone, 100 percent destroyed.“

This scares the pedo deep state! https://t.co/RgUlGxpRwz

• Save 40% on our limited edition Brain Force Ultra that’s loaded with proprietary super ingredients!

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 3, 2024

Trump added he’d also introduce a new policy reuniting trafficked children with their families and impose capital punishment for traffickers.

“I will use Title 42 to end the child trafficking crisis by returning all trafficked children to their families, in their home countries, and without delay. And I will urge Congress to ensure that anyone caught trafficking children across our border receives the death penalty immediately, and that includes also for women.”

This scares the pedo deep state! https://t.co/RgUlGxpRwz

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 3, 2024

Trump’s focus on the lucrative illicit smuggling trade comes as he’s also criticized deadly violence spilling into the US via the open southern border, blaming the Biden administration for an illegal alien crimewave leaving innocent Americans dead in its wake.

---

---