‘Mixed-Race’ Voter Torches Kamala Harris on MSNBC: World Crises Need More Than ‘Giggling And Having Girl Moment on Stage’
A mixed-race voter on a panel recently interviewed by MSNBC said she’s not falling for Kamala Harris’ girl power appeal to voters, saying there are serious crises in the world right now requiring a serious leader.
“Do you feel some kinship towards her as a mixed person?” a reporter asked a woman on the panel gauging mixed-race voters’ sentiments 67 days out from the election.
Voter on MSNBC destroys Kamala Harris: “We have three major international crises going on and someone applying to be Commander in Chief. As a woman, I want to see you do more than appeal to giggling and having a girl moment on stage.” pic.twitter.com/Sjho8uFSmC
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) August 30, 2024
“Not personally,” the woman replied, adding, “I find a lot of her trajectory to not be my brand of woman or leader.”
She went on to point out global conflicts require a steady confident leader, which isn’t what Harris is portraying.
“We’ve got three major international crises going on and someone applying to be commander in chief,” the woman said.
“As a woman, I want to see you do more than appeal to giggling and having a girl moment on the stage.”
The voter’s reaction came just hours after Harris finally sat down for her first interview since her installment as Democrat nominee after Joe Biden was unceremoniously booted off the ticket, and shows voters aren’t being hoodwinked by Harris’ charm offensive masking her lack of policy knowledge.
Berkeley Law School Dean Tells MSNBC It’s Time To Ditch US Constitution
University of California at Berkeley School of Law’s Dean Erwin Chemerinsky told MSNBC viewers on Friday the American Constitution “threatens” the future of “democracy” in the United States.
The lunatic liberal professor told mainstream media viewers the electoral college and having only two senators to represent each state are two concepts “undermining democracy.”
Law School Dean Tells MSNBC It’s Time To Scrap Constitution pic.twitter.com/ZzAVv7oQtt
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 30, 2024
Chemerinsky continued, claiming lifelong tenures for Supreme Court justices are also “problematic.”
Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson chimed in next, asking the Berkeley law dean if America is currently too divided to update the U.S. Constitution.
Instead of simply amending the Constitution, Chemerinsky went further by suggesting it’s time for “a new Constitution,” asking, “Isn’t it absurd that we’re governed in 2024 by a Constitution written in 1787 for a small agrarian, slave-owning society?”
Next, the legal scholar was asked about the threat of states seceding from the union if a new Constitution is introduced.
He responded, “What happens if we do nothing? We can continue to muddle along, but I worry about how long a government can survive, who has lost the confidence of people, how long a government can survive with a society so deeply polarized. We could drift towards authoritarianism. There are a lot of democracies in the world that are no longer democracies. But there’s also the possibility that we will start hearing serious talk that what divides us is much greater than what unites us as a country. So I think we have to think of — I’m not arguing for secession, I’m not saying it’s likely in the foreseeable future, but it’s certainly a path that could happen if we don’t repair what’s wrong in the American government.”
The news segment highlights how the modern leftist political establishment despises the pro-human documents created by our Founding Fathers.
Mainstream Scientists Finally Admit Good Nutrition Can Cure Dementia
Dementia can be prevented and cured by eating the right nutrition, numerous new studies have found. “There is extensive evidence supporting a relationship between diet and cognitive functions,” one of the studies said in the ‘Abstract’ […]
The post Mainstream Scientists Finally Admit Good Nutrition Can Cure Dementia appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Kamala’s Commie Machine Exposed: ‘The Civil War Is Not Over’
Kamala’s pre-taped interview released last night by CNN was bland and banal. According to the Trump campaign, CNN decided not to even release the full transcript of the chat, which got edited down to 18 minutes. President Trump criticized Kamala for not being the brightest bulb, saying, “She’s not very smart.”
Since Kamala Harris can only sit down with CNN for 18 pre-taped edited minutes to spout pabulum, it’s up to us on the MAGA side to point out that modern America has become a borderless dystopian nightmare with roving bands of murderous migrants rampaging around a post-industrial consumer grid as progressives finally get the “cultural enrichment” that they’ve been waiting for. Open-borders America isn’t going to be a row of ethnic bistros and bodegas in Brooklyn. Just ask the American refugees fleeing their homes in Aurora, Colorado after migrant gangsters sacked the building and left bullet holes in many of their cars.
This is the America that Kamala Harris wanted. In fact, Kamala Harris said that undocumented immigrants are not criminals. More on that in a moment.
Cringe Kamala is banking on pro-abortion liberal women and the so-called young people to carry her over the goal line, as evidenced by a recent youth-baiting pro-Democrat TikTok video that actually makes the viewers feel like we’re being sentenced to death in some kind of pagan sacrifice ritual as mostly Democrat women plus Pete Buttigieg methodically pound their fists in the air to the refrain of “We Will Rock You.” Of course, the bit is linked to sultan-of-Cringe Stephen Colbert.
Kamala doesn’t even like young people. In fact, Kamala Harris considers young people to be stupid. She said it herself! She said it more than once. She said it at least three times!
As more young people gravitate toward President Donald J. Trump, they’re beginning to realize who is actually stupid: Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris is actually stupid, as evidenced by her reaction to her good friend and protest partner Jussie Smollett’s hate hoax in which he pretended that MAGA people tried to lynch him in Chicago. To quote Ms. Harris: “Jussie Smollett is one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know. I’m praying for his quick recovery. This was an attempted modern day lynching. No one should have to fear for their life because of their sexuality or color of their skin. We must confront this hate.”
After it became apparent that Jussie staged and fabricated the whole thing, Kamala was, as usual, at a loss for words, stumbling around before issuing a Cringe written statement walking it back.
It’s not surprising that Kamala jumps from lie to lie, brazen partisan provocation to shameless race-baiting divide-and-conquer tactic. After all, ex-Willie Brown side piece Kamala Harris is, figuratively speaking, a lady of the night for left-wing anti-American Communist global interests like George Soros’ son Alexander Soros’ left-wing spending empire.
One of Kamala’s best friends is politics is a man named Steve Phillips, the co-founder of Democracy in Color. Steve Phillips has been one of Kamala’s top supporters throughout her major political career, dating back to local politics when she was running for San Francisco District Attorney. Steve Phillips also believes in his angry mind that a war is going on in America right now.
Steve Phillips stated that “the Civil War is not over. The Confederates have never stopped fighting. And we remain locked in an existential battle over whether America will be a white nation or whether it will be a multiracial democracy…We can and should finally win this war.”
For some reason, I don’t think the media or the federal government would classify what Mr. Phillips said as anti-white hate speech. But the Communists are sure determined to try to classify what YOU say as hate speech to try to shut you up so that you can’t talk about the Maoist takeover of America, according to Kamala’s goofball running mate Tampon Tim Walz, who said that free speech is not guaranteed when it comes to so-called “misinformation” or “hate speech” pertaining to “democracy.”
Sadly, Communist policies result in borderless chaos. And that’s where America is now, residing in a state of borderless chaos, in large part due to Kamala Harris.
In 2009, Kamala Harris allegedly wrote a book called “Smart on Crime” in which she explains the various ways in which she is not actually smart on crime. So what does it actually mean/
Kamala’s staffer Brandon Kiel, who was part of the pro-Kamala secret Masonic police force in Los Angeles that I told you about last week, agreed with Kamala’s message of being “smart on crime, and not tough on crime,” according to Brandon Kiel’s speech at a Masonic gathering.
It turns out Kamala Harris refused to charge an MS-13 killer before he murdered three innocent people, then Harris let the illegal immigrant killer avoid the death penalty.
Edwin Ramos is an illegal immigrant from El Salvador. Ramos is widely identified as an MS-13 gang member. He committed multiple crimes when he was a juvenile, including robbing a pregnant woman, and his criminal history was known to be “gang-related.” But of course San Francisco had a policy of not reporting juvenile felons to federal immigration authorities. An ex-MS 13 gangster said that Ramos committed a murder in 2006.
On June 22, 2008, a 48-year old man named Tony Bologna and his sons, 20-year old Michael and 16-year old Matthew, were driving home from a picnic and had some kind of traffic interaction with Ramos. Ramos may have mistakenly thought the Bolognas were rival gang members, and he killed the father and his sons.
Records reveal that Kamala Harris actually protected Edwin Ramos before the murders. That’s right. Ramos was in jail just a couple short months before the killings when somebody who was in his car tried to dump a gun linked to a homicide investigation, but then-San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris refused to charge him. Kamala Harris let Edwin Ramos go free to murder a father and his two sons. Kamala Harris then decided to shield Ramos from a possibility of getting the death penalty, so Ramos was sentenced to life in prison. In a jailhouse interview after the verdict, Ramos complained that he was treated unfairly by the judge. The crying lady he was referring to was the wife and mother of the victims, Danielle Bologna, a San Francisco resident who agreed that Kamala should have gone for the death sentence against Ramos. Danielle Bologna became an active Angel Mom who died in a car crash just last year.
Ladies and gentlemen, we must defeat Kamala Harris. We cannot allow a Communist ho to sell the United States of America the way she sells herself. Can you even imagine what the Lincoln Bedroom would be used for in a Kamala White House?
At PatrickReports.com, we will continue exposing the Kamala Files from now until Kamala is defeated in November. And we are seeing results. In fact, I was recently cited in the media as the guy who found the name of Doug Emhoff’s ex-nanny and helped break the Doug Emhoff nanny affair scandal implicating Kamala’s husband. Let’s take our trophies where we can get them. And let’s get President Donald J. Trump his rightful job back at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest in Washington, D.C. Go to PatrickReports.com for more facts.
God bless you, God Bless America, and God Bless President Trump.
WATCH EPISODE 2 of “THE KAMALA FILES” ON BANNED DOT VIDEO
BREAKING: Dr. Peter McCullough Joins Alex Jones In-Studio To Discuss Shocking New Developments Concerning The COVID-19 Injections
Globalists Are Trying To Escalate The Ukraine War Into WWIII Before The US Election
The purpose of NATO involvement in the Ukraine War has, to me, always appeared obvious. Ukraine has nothing to do with the interests of the western public, nothing to do with the security of Europe and nothing to do with the economic advancement of the United States. Yet, NATO and the globalists have been politically interfering in the region since at least 2014 and preparing the ground for an eventual war with Russia.
To be clear, I don’t favor Russia any more than I favor Ukraine. The Kremlin has long had its own ties to the globalists, as I have outlined in numerous articles. How deep those ties go is up for debate – Maybe the honeymoon is over and Russia is truly done trying to get a seat at the globalist table. What I do know is that western elites want a world war and they have done everything in their power to start one.
Look at it this way: What if you were to make a list of all the covert and overt NATO operations in Ukraine and then flipped script? What if Russia was pursuing all the same agendas of destabilization, control and arms proliferation in Mexico (as the Soviets did in Cuba in the 1960s)? If the US invaded Mexico preemptively it would be completely understandable.
Whether or not Putin is acting in the best interests of Russia doesn’t really matter. The war was inevitable anyway because NATO made sure it was impossible to avoid. But what purpose does such a proxy war serve? Well, it doesn’t serve much purpose at all…unless the goal is to instigate a wider world war between the East and the West. In that scenario the globalists benefit greatly.
They get a scapegoat for the economic collapse they’ve already set in motion. They multiply the global fear factor and make the public desperate for the political elites to step in and solve all their problems. And, they can get rid of their domestic enemies (conservatives and patriots) by accusing them of “working with Russia” to undermine the war effort if they dare to rebel against unconstitutional mandates.
Beyond that, they also get an opportunity to send young men (who might rebel) off to the meat grinder in Ukraine so that there’s no new generation of freedom fighters to deal with. World War III is a win-win-win for the Davos crowd, as long as it doesn’t go full-on nuclear holocaust and wipe out their carefully crafted surveillance states.
But how do they turn the proxy war into a world war without looking like the bad guys? That’s the trick, isn’t it?
The proxy (in this case, Ukraine) would have to take actions that provoke Russia into an explosive outburst. Russia would have to utilize tactics or weaponry that puts a vast number of civilians at risk, requiring greater NATO involvement and perhaps even UN intervention. They need Russia to level a major city containing hundreds of thousands of civilians. They need Russia to drop MOABs or nukes. They need a dramatic war crime; otherwise, the western public is not going to support boots on the ground or agree to a military draft.
Popular support for monetary and military aid in Ukraine is waning quickly and Ukraine knows they are about to lose. The Kursk offensive looks like an act of desperation triggered by this reality.
The Kursk region has almost no modern strategic value. It’s a rural agricultural area with a limited industrial base. It does have natural gas pipelines that send energy to Europe, but that doesn’t help Ukraine. They’re already in trouble with Germany for blowing up the Nordstream pipeline. There is also a nuclear power plant in the area but it’s too far away for Ukraine’s troops to seize it (They could try to destroy it with drones and cause a nuclear incident, but this would have to be done covertly without Ukraine taking direct credit).
Mainstream strategists argue that the Kursk operation was designed to force Russia to move crack troops away from the Donbas front where they are making impressive gains. This would allegedly slow down Russia’s attrition based offensive and change the direction of the war. But if that was the plan, it failed miserably.
Ukraine’s troops in Kursk have reportedly been contained. Using NATO-style maneuver tactics to invade Kursk has also done nothing to slow Russia’s advance as they are now primed to take the key city of Toretsk. They are also approaching Pokrovsk (the main staging ground for Ukraine’s forces in the east). These areas are heavily defended with long term entrenchments, but Russia is rolling right through them. The lines beyond these cities are thin or non-existent. Ukraine would immediately be forced to negotiate a cease fire.
Russia also launched the largest missile and drone strikes of the war in fifteen Ukrainian oblasts, causing even greater disruptions to utilities. This proves two things: The Russian military has NOT been diminished or crippled and they still have ample long range ordnance, despite what NATO officials originally claimed
There’s a reason why Kursk was so lightly defended by Russia – It’s not worth anything to Ukraine in terms of winning the war. That said, I would like to offer an alternative theory on why Ukraine made such a move…
The moment Ukraine crossed onto Russian soil the media and political narrative changed. The word today is that the Kremlin’s “red lines” are meaningless and that Ukraine has proven that Putin is “all talk” when it comes to nuclear weapons and metropolitan strikes. The discussion has turned to the use of US and European long range missiles deep into Russian territory. The Ukrainian government (with NATO behind it) is demanding that US and European officials allow them access to the big-boy toys.
Again, the Biden Administration has to at least appear resistant to this idea. They know if they openly give the green light to offensive ATACM strikes on Russian soil beyond the front that they will be seen as stepping over the line of logistical “support” into the realm of direct warfare with the Russians. Yes, I’m well aware that NATO intel and “advisers” have been on the ground in Ukraine since before the war began. The point is, it’s not official policy because the public would not accept it.
Long range strikes into Russia, I believe, will set in motion more Russian strikes on major cities in the west of Ukraine where the majority of the population lives. These areas have gone largely untouched during the duration of the war. Putin, despite what the media claims, has been careful to limit the targeting of larger civilian centers. That will end if NATO missiles hit Russian cities.
Kursk may have been an attempt to embarrass Russia into wild strikes on civilian targets, thereby giving NATO a reason to intervene. That’s one theory. Another theory is that the Kursk operation is designed to convince western policy makers and the public that there will be no nuclear repercussions; that Putin is all bluster and Ukraine should be given more advanced tools to bomb Moscow.
This narrative is largely promoted by the Atlantic Council, a globalist think-tank with ties to the World Economic Forum and the “Three Seas Initiative.” The Atlantic Council directly advises the Ukrainian government on all aspect of the war, including strategy through their Eurasian Center. They also advise NATO through their Scowcroft Center. As their website notes:
“The Eurasia Center has worked tirelessly to respond to the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, using our well-respected and high-visibility platform and leveraging relationships in government, civil society, and the media to have great impact. The Eurasia Center offers recommendations directly to the U.S. administration and Congress, senior Ukrainian officials, European leadership, international media, and civil society. The Center tracks the military and political situation within Ukraine and advocates for stronger, faster measures to stall and mitigate the damage of the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine.”
I would argue that the Atlantic Council is the primary globalist “influencer” in the Ukraine war – The source for the majority of strategic decisions and propaganda. Their support of the ‘Three Seas Initiative” since 2014 has been the driving force in the effort to bring Ukraine into the EU and NATO (the primary reason why the war started in the first place).
Lindsay Graham, a Neo-Con and rabid proponent of using Ukraine as a proxy to ignite a war with Russia, has been participating in Atlantic Council projects since at least 2010.
It’s the Atlantic Council and their media contacts, in my opinion, that are pushing for large scale missile strikes into Russia. They are also the source for the claim that Putin’s red lines are a fake out. They state on their website:
“Ukraine’s offensive is now posing serious questions about the credibility of Russia’s saber-rattling and the rationality behind the West’s abundance of caution. After all, the Ukrainian army’s current invasion of Russia is surely the reddest of all red lines. If Russia was at all serious about a possible nuclear escalation, this would be the moment to make good on its many threats. In fact, Putin has responded by seeking to downplay the invasion while pretending that everything is still going according to plan.”
This is the same propaganda that has been spreading into most establishment media platforms in recent weeks. (As a side note, the Atlantic Council was also heavily involved in the funding of covid mandate and vaccine propaganda during the pandemic scare).
The idea that ballistic volleys into Russia using NATO supplied missiles won’t result in Putin using MOABs or nukes is truly insane. Keep in mind, long range strikes into Russia will do nothing to change the conditions on the ground in the Donbas.
Even if the globalists can’t convince western populations to give the thumbs up for ballistic attacks on Russia using weapons paid for with our tax dollars, the powers-that-be have a contingency plan. Ukraine has recently announced that they have developed their OWN long range ballistic missile, and those weapons supposedly don’t fall under the supervision of the US and Europe.
Eventually these kinds of strikes will lead to a Russian response that will appear brutal; and western warhawks will squeeze that event for all it’s worth. They’ll run with it straight to the Pentagon and demand a plan for US military conscription. If this is the agenda then they’ll need to make it happen BEFORE the elections in November.
Donald Trump is looking increasingly likely to be the winner of the presidential race. I have long held that the globalists will wrap up an economic collapse or a world war and throw it in Trump’s lap. They already tried to do the same thing with the covid pandemic and the inflationary crisis.
The timing of the Kursk offensive and the call for missile strikes on Russia is not a coincidence. Trump claims that his intention is to end the Ukraine war as quickly as possible once he enters office. This will likely mean a leveraged peace settlement that will involve Ukraine giving up the Donbas region to Russia. If Trump is sincere, then there are many elites in the Atlantic Council, the WEF and NATO that will not be happy.
They need to escalate the war into something bigger, something that can’t be undone. Right now, the war can be ended – All it takes is some diplomacy and forcing Ukraine to understand that they’re not going to get the Donbas or Crimea back no matter how many lives they sacrifice. But if there are massive civilian casualties on either side, the situation becomes irreversible. I suspect this is what the globalists want.
BREAKING: Dr. Peter McCullough Joins Alex Jones In-Studio To Discuss Shocking New Developments Concerning The COVID-19 Injections
Mayor Of Aurora, Colorado Blames Biden-Harris Open Border For Venezuelan Gang Takeover
Mayor Mike Coffman of Aurora, Colorado, talked with Fox News this week about the wave of violent crimes perpetrated by armed Venezuelan gangs who’ve recently taken over entire complexes in his city.
NEW: Mayor of Aurora, CO suggests the federal government may have funded to send the Venezualan gangs to Aurora.
The armed gangs took over apartment complexes and acted as the landlords, collecting rents. They now control parts of the city and violent crime is skyrocketing. pic.twitter.com/UcfGI9Z2hB— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 30, 2024
Shocking videos going viral on social media show large groups of armed Venezuelans invading entire apartment complexes and using them as headquarters for robbing stores, kidnapping and human trafficking.
Coffman explained he’s investigating where the Venezuelans came from and who paid for the operation, suggesting it could have been the Biden administration.
“I’m trying to walk it back and do the, and do the investigation as to how there’s a concentration of Venezuelans, in these, these three buildings,” he said. “Somebody put them there and somebody funded it, whether it’s federal government or not, we’re trying to find out who, these gangs apparently, or attracted to where there’s a concentration of, of, Venezuelan migrants. And so, they’ve, in fact, have kind of pushed out the property management through intimidation and then, collected the rents.”
Property managers at multiple apartment complexes have reportedly been scared off by the armed gangs.
Coffman pointed out the root of the issue is mass illegal immigration into America under the Biden-Harris regime, saying, “[This is] not our problem, federal problem or issue. They need to resolve it. Not us. But somehow we got sucked into this.”
“I think we’re a victim of a failed policy at the southern border because, what you have, I, Venezuelan, does not according to to my law enforcement, Venezuela does not cooperate with the United States in sharing criminal histories. You had a third of the country leave,” the mayor added.
The terrifying takeover seen in Aurora will only spread to other cities if Democrats remain in power, and any U.S. citizens who dare fight back would surely be punished as the state will always defend its new protected class.
Watch Alex Jones break down the Venezuelan illegal migrant crime wave in the exclusive video below: