Pentagon Breaks Silence About ‘Evidence’ Taylor Swift ‘Psy-Op’ Pushing Globalist Agenda
A Pentagon spokesperson has labelled claims that Taylor Swift is being used as an “asset” as part of a psychological operation pushing the globalist agenda is nothing more than a “crazy conspiracy theory.” Given the […]
The post Pentagon Breaks Silence About ‘Evidence’ Taylor Swift ‘Psy-Op’ Pushing Globalist Agenda appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Shock Claim: Spike Protein REPLACES Sperm in Vaxxed Men
Sperm cells in males who have received a Covid-19 injection are being replaced by spike proteins, a German medical examiner has disturbingly claimed.
During a recent lecture, the late pathologist Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt explained how after examining tissue samples from both young and old men who died following vaccination, he discovered spike proteins had overtaken sperm producing organs and the sperm itself.
Sperm Is Replaced Completely By Spike Protein In “Vaccinated”
— Red Walrus (@_RedWalrus_) April 10, 2023
Dr. Arne Burkhardt shows a medical slideshow of two individuals that confirmed spike proteins replacing sperm entirely or almost entirely in the testes. pic.twitter.com/MwohO5ECpm
“Here you see the case where we show the testes,” Burkhardt said, pointing to a slide, “and you can see that in this 28-year-old man who had a healthy son and who died 140 days after injection, the spike protein is in the strongly expressed in the spermatogenic organ in the testes, and you can see there are almost no spermatozides in here, but it’s strongly expression of spike protein in the spermatoconic tissue.”
WOAH?
Professor Arne Burkhardt shows that they are finding spike proteins being produced all over the body after mRNA vaccination, including the testicles.
All the brown dots are spike proteins in the prostate. pic.twitter.com/HtwnGA2i07— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) January 22, 2023
Dr. Burkhardt next described the same issue with the older patient, saying, “So also in the older person, this is an old man, and you can see here also a strong expression in the spermatogonia, there’s not one single spermatozoon in this, and a strong expression of the spike protein.”
The forensic pathologist went on to caution women against producing offspring with vaccinated males, saying, “If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a person, from a man who has been vaccinated.”
RELATED — Demand for ‘Unvaxxed’ Sperm Soars: Women Looking For Donors Who Refused Experimental Covid Jab
The research coincides with other data showing female ovaries are also destroyed by the spike protein present in the mRNA shots, suggesting the jabs prompt a complete overhaul of the human reproduction system.
COVID Vaccine-Induced Infertility? Every Man and Woman Should Be Concerned@P_McCulloughMD: “[Spike protein] almost certainly is causing death and destruction of those precious ovarian cells.”
— The Vigilant Fox ? (@VigilantFox) February 26, 2023
“Those lower in range will be rendered infertile through each injection period.” pic.twitter.com/mYHoMZoAOe
Dr. Burkhardt’s observations demonstrate how Covid vaccines are having a devastating impact on humanity and the reproduction of our species. At the very least, his discoveries warrant further investigation on the subject.
The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!
Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.
Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.
College Vaccine Mandates: Here to Stay?
It is January 2024, and Covid vaccine mandates persist at 70 of the top 800 colleges in the US, and who knows if they will ever let them go. If you are a healthcare major, nearly every clinical partner site still mandates that healthcare students take the most updated Covid vaccine (often no exemptions accepted) even if those sites are affiliated with colleges and universities that do not currently mandate Covid vaccines.
It is truly remarkable with all that we have learned about these novel medical treatments that colleges can still coerce students into taking them. In fact, it is truly remarkable that any college ever announced Covid vaccine mandates in the spring of 2021 given that by this time the CDC (upon which the colleges dutifully and explicitly relied) knew they were ineffective at preventing infection and transmission. So, while we have all come to understand that mandating students to take Covid vaccines does very little if anything to protect the vulnerable members of the community, this remains the single biggest reason colleges put forth to explain why they mandate(d) them.
When colleges began preparing to return to in-person learning in the Fall of 2021, they built Covid dashboards to keep track of infection rates on campus. At that time, there were both large college systems and small colleges that never mandated Covid vaccines and that fared better week-to-week with Covid infection rates than other large and small colleges that mandated Covid vaccines.
I analyzed colleges in New Hampshire over several months only to find that the University of New Hampshire, which never mandated Covid vaccines and has triple the undergraduate enrollment of Dartmouth College, consistently had less Covid infections on their dashboard than Dartmouth, which announced a Covid vaccine mandate in April of 2021. I wrote to Dartmouth administrators countless times to point this out, but I either got no reply or no acknowledgement of my observations. Dartmouth ended their Covid vaccine mandate on April 11, 2023, two years after they implemented it, and after over 98% of their campus community had taken the initial series and at least one booster.
Prior to fall 2021, to help ensure a high uptake of Covid vaccines, Jerome Adams, the Surgeon General at the time, wrote an “Open Letter to Leaders in Higher Education” urging them to mandate Covid vaccines on college campuses. If colleges choose not to mandate Covid vaccines “we are asking leaders to take strong steps to get as close as possible to 100 percent of their students, faculty and staff vaccinated early in the academic year.”
The letter went on to say “[f]or all colleges and universities, we also encourage steps to make vaccination easy. Set up pop-up vaccine clinics to meet students as they return to campus, including move-in, orientation, football games and tailgates, and at student life events. Offer paid leave for staff and faculty to get vaccinated and in the event of side effects. Engage with your student leaders to get word out about vaccination to other students. Start a student ambassador program using the ACHA toolkit here. Peer-to-peer engagement is one of the best ways to achieve behavior change in young adults.” The letter was signed by 38 other “public health and science experts, leaders in health, education, and civil society, and former officials from both political parties.”
The “toolkit” referenced in the letter was created by the American College Health Association (“ACHA”) which receives its largest funding from Pfizer and the CDC. It was fraught with false statements and suggested coercive tactics that paid college student influencers could use to bully other students into taking Covid vaccines. Many student influencers were hired at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (“HBCUs”) of which at least 9 HBCUs still have a Covid vaccine mandate. The false marketing materials have since been deleted from the ACHA website and replaced with a legal landscape memorandum which you can read here.
Shortly after this open letter was sent, the White House rolled out the College Covid-19 Vaccine Challenge with as much propaganda and as many false narratives as they could create, none of it backed by data or science but simply because this would ensure huge vaccine uptake from captive college students of which there were 19 million as per the letter. Many of these students had already paid tuition, some had already enrolled, and most were made to feel so afraid for their lives and the lives of vulnerable members of the community who would surely die if all students didn’t take their required Covid vaccines. Of course, this never happened but the idea of saying no or pushing back against these mandates would have led to disenrollment from their programs or their beloved college or worse, social suicide from which they would never recover so they remained silent to the tyranny and still largely do.
While an official transcript of Dr Anthony Fauci’s testimony in private sessions held by the US Select Subcommittee over the last few days has yet to be released, the Select Subcommittee posted on X (formerly Twitter) that one of the highlights of Day 2 of his testimony was that “Dr Fauci advised American universities to impose vaccine mandates on their students.” Representative Brad Wenstrup posted on the homepage of his website a statement which read in part, “It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely.” While arguably the most contemptible abuse of power in recent history, at this point, it should come as no surprise.
By or before the spring of 2022, colleges and universities began removing their Covid dashboards. Many explained it was because their communities were over 90% vaccinated so they didn’t need to track infections any longer. We all know, however, it was because the vaccines didn’t work to stop the transmission of Covid on college campuses and administrators could not bear to post any evidence that pointed to the utter failure of Covid vaccine mandates.
Some of us knew from the beginning and the rest of us have come to learn that college Covid vaccine mandates were ineffective at “protecting the community” from the spread of the virus, but whether colleges and universities will ever admit this is another matter entirely. In fact, to this day, the colleges that still mandate Covid vaccines continue to regurgitate “We must continue to be diligent to prevent the spread of the virus.”
You can find the most up-to-date list of colleges that still mandate vaccines on the homepage of our website or by clicking here.
You can also find my favorite list of colleges that never mandated Covid vaccines on the homepage of our website or by clicking here. There are caveats, however, as some of the colleges on the never list would have mandated Covid vaccines if not prevented by state law from doing so. Read all the notes carefully, and if you know of other colleges to add to this list or have had coercive experiences with colleges that we didn’t note, please email us at: info@nocollegemandates.com.
In the fall of 2021, we began tracking over 800 of the “top” colleges and universities in the US that mandated Covid vaccines, and we continue to track each of those colleges offering daily updates as they slowly announce(d) the end of their mandates. Never did I think in 2024 there would be 70 colleges that refused to drop Covid vaccine mandates in favor of the prevailing science which so few in the medical establishment and in higher education will review, study, or endorse yet here we are.
BREAKING: UN Planning New Pandemic To Establish Planetary Dictatorship
SEC Greenlights Bitcoin ETFs Amidst Social Media Whoopsie
On Wednesday, January 10th, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made an interesting decision, voting to allow everyday folks to participate in spot bitcoin ETFs. This move marks an opening for a broader audience to delve into Bitcoin speculation.
The approved ETFs are set to be listed on various exchanges, including Nasdaq, the New York Stock Exchange, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange. This is supposed to provide an additional layer of oversight. But the announcement went terribly wrong, amplifying concerns about the ETFs.
The highly anticipated SEC vote on bitcoin ETFs impacted the cryptocurrency market, propelling the price of Bitcoin to over $47,000 on the day of trading. Proponents argue that buying into a Bitcoin ETF provides a more accessible and secure option compared to directly purchasing Bitcoin. The latter involves storing the cryptocurrency in a digital wallet or holding it on an OTC exchange, exposing BTC owners to very real security risks, while ETFs offer a regulated and more secure alternative.
The SEC’s announcement approving bitcoin ETFs encountered a setback due to a social media misstep. A false post on X/Twitter prematurely claimed the approval of Bitcoin ETFs, leading to a brief surge in Bitcoin’s price. SEC Chair Gary Gensler clarified on his personal account that the SEC’s account had been compromised, and the purported approval was unauthorized and invalid. Understandably, the incident raised questions about the security controls of the SEC’s social media account (to say the least).
Despite a momentary episode of confusion on social media, the SEC’s approval signifies a milestone in the unpredictable and speculative journey of Bitcoin. Notably, major firms such as BlackRock and Fidelity are among the 11 issuers whose applications were accepted, allowing them to act as custodians and issuers of BTC ETFs.
The recent approval of Bitcoin ETFs by the SEC has increased the accessibility of BTC, prompting prudent commentary from Peter Schiff. Peter properly notes that Bitcoin functions as a wealth transfer tool, shifting the savings of one speculator to another. In a cautionary tweet, he states that the full impact on the speculative Bitcoin game remains uncertain, “jury is still out as to how much wealth will be lost, and who will lose it. But those who bought Bitcoin early and got out certainly took a lot of wealth away from those who got in later.”
Peter cautions against overly optimistic expectations for the bitcoin ETF approval rally. Describing it as a ‘buy the rumor, sell the rumor of the news’ event, Schiff suggests that waiting too long to sell Bitcoin may leave certain players holding the bag, Peter concludes with a final warning, “Those who wait for the actual news to sell their Bitcoin may discover that there are very few speculators left to buy!”
Amid varying opinions, the SEC’s decision has undeniably broadened the avenues for bitcoin speculation, providing alternatives to direct ownership. Regarding the bitcoin rally, this speculative casino game may potentially have many more years and significant rallies to come ($100k Bitcoin? Maybe). Nevertheless, as Peter frequently and wisely mentions, Bitcoin is not battle-tested; it’s not a store of value, and it will not endure in the long run.
The NWO’s 2024 Black Swan Tell
The Moral Obligation of Civil Disobedience
My childhood was unique.
I attended St. Agnes School in the Oakland neighborhood of the City of Pittsburgh. Contrary to what one might expect, I was one of only a handful of Catholic students enrolled in the school; the typical student at St. Agnes School was black and non-Catholic, with their parents seeking a place of refuge from the Pittsburgh Public Schools.
As such, the battle against slavery and racial segregation in this country occupied a significant part of our instruction time. We learned about the heroes of the Civil Rights Movement, from Rosa Parks to Martin Luther King, Jr. We learned that progress was made specifically by those who refused to obey unjust laws.
In my young, innocent mind, I was left with a simple thought that I have held onto until today: slavery and segregation only were allowed to exist because supposedly “good” people sinned through indifference, and they only came to an end when enough people arose who refused to conform to the injustice of the status quo.
My thoughts along these lines were given further substance when Henry David Thoreau’s “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” was assigned to us in my sophomore year of high school. The moral obligation to disobey unjust laws non-violently and then to accept punishment in the hopes of forcing change was one of the major lessons I took away from my Catholic schooling. The willingness to embrace the consequences of such non-violent direct action was one of the things I admired about the political left, even if I did not count myself one of its members.
Now over twenty years later, I’m forced to ask: what happened to the political left? The immoral thugs of Antifa and other groups commit violence in the name of “direct action.” When police respond they resist or flee instead of peacefully submitting to arrest. Finally, and most damningly, the left denies the right of conscience or protest at all to their perceived enemies, instead surrendering themselves to the logic of totalitarianism.
The year 2020 showed this bizarre betrayal of once-held values in full contrast. Violent riots were called good violations of lockdowns and protests against lockdowns were derided as killing grandma.
At the academic level, a bizarre paper appeared in Criminal Law and Philosophy which alleges to address the topic of “Civil Disobedience in Times of Pandemic: Clarifying Rights and Duties.” It examines two scenarios of civil disobedience: “(1) healthcare professionals refusing to attend work as a protest against unsafe working conditions, and (2) citizens who use public demonstration and deliberately ignore measures of social distancing as a way of protesting against lockdown.”
Rather than give the obvious response that the obligation to treat patients even in the presence of danger is a just law (and refusing to do so is not civil disobedience) and protesting the confinement to one’s home by not staying home is a classic case of civil disobedience, the authors spend many paragraphs arriving at the precisely wrong answer: “only the case of healthcare professionals qualifies as morally justified civil disobedience.”
As we approach the holiday of Martin Luther King, Jr. I’d like to suggest that everyone should take the time to read his defense of civil disobedience in “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” which he wrote in response to eight religious leaders who expressed caution and concern against his acts of civil disobedience. The whole thing is worth reading, but in particular I’d like to draw attention to the following four ideas:
- King lays out what legitimate nonviolent action should look like. Note especially the third step of self-purification which involves the resolve to accept violence against oneself without retaliation and to willingly endure criminal punishment if necessary.
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. We have gone through all these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known.
Negroes have experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts. There have been more unsolved bombings of Negro homes and churches in Birmingham than in any other city in the nation. These are the hard, brutal facts of the case. On the basis of these conditions, Negro leaders sought to negotiate with the city fathers. But the latter consistently refused to engage in good faith negotiation…
Mindful of the difficulties involved, we decided to undertake a process of self purification. We began a series of workshops on nonviolence, and we repeatedly asked ourselves: “Are you able to accept blows without retaliating?” “Are you able to endure the ordeal of jail?”
- Civil disobedience is precisely necessary when society as a group needs to be convinced to act morally:
My friends, I must say to you that we have not made a single gain in civil rights without determined legal and nonviolent pressure. Lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily. Individuals may see the moral light and voluntarily give up their unjust posture; but, as Reinhold Niebuhr has reminded us, groups tend to be more immoral than individuals.
We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.
- King addresses the distinction between just and unjust laws. The former are to be obeyed. The latter are to be broken, but in a loving manner:
You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?”
The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.”
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law…
I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Of course, there is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience. It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. To a degree, academic freedom is a reality today because Socrates practiced civil disobedience. In our own nation, the Boston Tea Party represented a massive act of civil disobedience.
We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was “legal” and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was “illegal.” It was “illegal” to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a Communist country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that country’s antireligious laws.
- In times of injustice, the moderate who levels the accusation of extremism is the largest obstacle:
I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action;” who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”
Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality.
Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.
We live in turbulent times, and the power of civil disobedience has already been demonstrated by truckers in Canada and farmers in Germany. History is replete with examples of determined minorities who break the power of the elites while ignoring the objection of the moderates who love order over justice.
Perhaps we should all go back and read our Augustine, Aquinas, Thoreau, and King. We are all called to the heroism of always choosing to act justly, even in the face of great opposition.
“I Will Kill Them”: Store Owner Vows to Take Law into Own Hands Following String of Robberies
A convenience store owner in California fed up with a string of robberies says he’s going to resort to lethal force in order to protect his business.
Speaking to NBC Bay Area, Oakland-based store owner Sam Jebril noted he’d installed steel doors and locks in efforts to deter brazen criminals who have repeatedly targeted his store, to no avail.
“They cut the locks. They have the tool to cut the locks. They went inside. They caused so much damage,” Jebril said.
“There is no law and order in this town. The criminals running the show in Oakland.”
During a recent break-in, Jebril attempted to summon police but got a busy signal when he dialed 9-1-1, so he drove to his store and blocked the thieves’ vehicle using his own truck, minimizing their looting.
“I took my truck. I pushed their cars, was parking that on the front of the store, and they came out,” the store owner described.
Advisor & Executive Director of Oakland’s up-and-coming “Laurel” neighborhood business district Daniel Swafford told NBC the problem is “These are organized criminals. This is organized crime.”
“They have this brazen sense of they can do whatever they want anytime they want, and businesses are reeling from it,” Swafford admitted.
The store owner says he’s tired of waiting in vain for the city’s help, and says the next robber he encounters will meet his maker.
“[I’ll] shoot them,” he admitted.
“I’m well armed, legally armed, and I promise you, somebody steps foot, try to do something, I will kill him, ’cause the city won’t do anything about it. I will do something about it,” Jebril said, adding, “There is nothing. There’s no other choice for me to do.”
The out-of-control lawlessness running rampant in blue cities is illustrative of the mismanagement of Democrat city, state and federal legislators, but what do you expect when your elected representative is more concerned with virtue-signaling and race rather than the safety of her constituents.
Women of color have more political power than ever before. We are Governors, Senators, Attorneys General, and Members of Congress. I stand with all of my sisters in Congress and across the country – we’re not backing down and we aren’t going anywhere. pic.twitter.com/VKAKbIEkDD
— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) July 15, 2019
H/t: toddstarnes.com
The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!
Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.
Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.