Callers Ask: Was The Illuminati Behind The Attempted Assassination Of Trump?
Callers weigh in on The Alex Jones Show about whether the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump was the work of the Illuminati or the lower level Deep State.
Callers Asks: Was The Illuminati Behind The Attempted Assassination Of Trump? pic.twitter.com/cyJWgPMZzv
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) August 30, 2024
VIDEO: Berkeley Law School Dean Tells MSNBC It’s Time To Ditch US Constitution
Alex Jones breaks down the dean of the University of California at Berkeley’s law school calling for the scrapping of the Constitution, claiming that failing to make changes to it would cause the U.S. to “drift toward authoritarianism.”
VIDEO: Berkeley Law School Dean Tells MSNBC It’s Time To Ditch US Constitution
This Is A Direct Attack On Our Republic pic.twitter.com/8qAGv8qlzm— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) August 30, 2024
Google Restricts Election-Related Content From Its AI Products
Google is implementing ‘new protections’ for its generative AI products into the election, announcing on Friday that it will extend its policies announced last December for its search and YouTube products.
The restrictions will include a lack of responses for a wide range of election-related queries, including candidates, voting processes, and election results, Axios reports.
Products affected include Search AI overlays, YouTube AI-generated summaries for Live Chat, Gems, and Gemini’s image generation.
“We’re taking a cautious approach because we want to get this right,” said the company.
Google says they’ve made the change due to ‘misinformation concerns’ – particularly around the election.
- It’s essentially up to the industry to regulate uses of generative AI around elections, as Congress has yet to pass any bills and federal agencies look unlikely to take any meaningful action on AI in elections this year.
- Most companies are adapting their existing election policies for their new AI experiences, including OpenAI. -Axios
So – with Google products nerf’d, let’s see how X’s Grok does with realtime election queries as we head into the home stretch. X has already updated Grok after reports that it was spreading election misinformation in regards to ballot deadlines in several states.
In response to queries, the AI assistant will now say “For accurate and up-to-date information about the 2024 US Elections, please visit Vote.gov.”
“We appreciate X’s action to improve their platform and hope they continue to make improvements that will ensure their users have access to accurate information from trusted sources in this critical election year,” said election officials from Minnesota, New Mexico, Michigan, Washington, and Pennsylvania in response to a complaint sent to Musk.
Of course, as Headline USA‘s Ben Sellers wrote this week, according to the Heritage Oversight Project, an election-integrity watchdog launched by prominent conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation, the deadline for removing Biden from the ballot has already long since passed in Georgia, Wisconsin and Nevada.
This is big. It’s likely already too late to remove Joe Biden from the ballot.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 28, 2024
WISCONSIN — It’s already too late to remove Joe Biden from the ballot.
NEVADA—After tonight, the fourth Friday in June, it will be too late to remove Joe Biden.
GEORGIA—Only a few weeks remain…
So Grok wasn’t spreading misinformation after all?
The Globalists Are All Hat and No Cattle
ICC Orders Asian Country to Arrest Putin
Mongolia must detain Russian President Vladimir Putin because it is a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC), a spokesman for the Hague-based body has said.
Putin is scheduled to visit Russia’s neighbor on Monday, to mark the 85th anniversary of a major World War II battle. This would theoretically put him at risk of arrest on the ICC’s “war crimes” warrant, as Ulaanbaatar recognizes the court’s jurisdiction.
All states that signed the Rome Statute “have the obligation to cooperate in accordance with Chapter IX,” ICC spokesman Fadi el-Abdallah told the BBC on Friday. The Rome Statute is an international treaty that set up the court, which Mongolia ratified in 2002.
“In case of non-cooperation, ICC judges may make a finding to that effect and inform the Assembly of States Parties of it. It is then for the Assembly to take any measure it deems appropriate,” el-Abdallah said.
The Rome Statute provides for exemptions when arresting someone would “breach a treaty obligation” with another country or violate the “diplomatic immunity of a person or property of a third state.”
Ukraine has also filed an official demand with Mongolia to arrest Putin, according to the government in Kiev.
Moscow “has no concerns” about the ICC warrant, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters earlier on Friday, noting that all possible issues concerning Putin’s visit have been “worked out separately” in advance.
The ICC issued a warrant for Putin’s arrest in March 2023, accusing the Russian president of “unlawful deportation of population (children)” and “unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation.”
Moscow has rejected the claims as ridiculous, noting that the evacuation of civilians from combat zones was not a crime. Moreover, neither Russia nor Ukraine is party to the Rome Statute, meaning that the ICC has no jurisdiction in the matter.
Putin is expected to attend a ceremony commemorating the 1939 Battle of Khalkhin Gol. The decisive victory of the Red Army and its Mongolian allies over the Imperial Japanese Army secured the Soviet Union’s eastern flank until 1945.
The Globalists Are All Hat and No Cattle
FBI Repeatedly Botches Child Abuse Investigations, New Report Finds
A scathing new report from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has found that the FBI has repeatedly failed to comply with its own policies and federal laws regarding the handling of tips on child sexual abuse.
The audit, which follows up on the infamous mishandling of allegations against former USA Gymnastics physician Lawrence Nassar, uncovered significant gaps in the bureau’s response to serious allegations involving suspected child abuse.
The audit, covering the period between October 2021 and February 2023, scrutinized 327 incidents of alleged hands-on sex offenses against children and found that the FBI has been non-compliant in key areas, including mandatory reporting, victim services, and timely responses to ongoing abuse. Particularly concerning is the revelation that 13% of the reviewed cases were flagged for immediate attention due to substantial deficiencies that could have left children in harm’s way.
“We found the FBI does not document and process all incoming tips and allegations within Guardian and 40 percent of the incidents we reviewed did not include evidence that the FBI responded to an allegation involving active or ongoing child sexual abuse within 24 hours as required by FBI guidance,” reads the report.
Gaps in Mandatory Reporting
According to the report, FBI employees failed to comply with mandatory reporting laws in 47% of incidents involving suspected child abuse. In some cases, there was no evidence that FBI employees had made the required reports to state or local law enforcement or social services agencies. The lack of compliance persisted despite updated training and policies implemented after the Nassar scandal aimed at ensuring FBI personnel understood their obligations as mandatory reporters.
““In our review, we found that for 36 percent of eligible victims in our sample, there was no evidence that the victim received appropriate services or updates,” reads the report.
Moreover, even when FBI employees did report suspected abuse, they often failed to do so within the 24-hour window required by FBI policy. The audit found that only 43% of the reports were made within the mandated timeframe, and just 17% of those reports were fully documented as required.
Investigations Left Stalled and Unaddressed
One of the most troubling findings of the audit was the significant number of cases where the FBI did not take timely or adequate action in response to allegations of child sexual abuse. In one instance, the bureau received a tip about a registered sex offender allegedly involved in ongoing abuse but took over a year to initiate any substantive investigative action. During this period of inaction, the subject reportedly victimized at least one additional minor.
Another case highlighted in the report involved a complaint of sex trafficking of minors that languished without investigation for nearly a year. The report notes that such delays could have catastrophic consequences, potentially allowing abusers to continue preying on children.
Victim Services Lacking
The report also points to deficiencies in providing victim services, a critical component of handling child sexual abuse cases. In 36% of eligible cases, the FBI failed to provide victims with information about available services or case status updates. The lack of victim engagement raises questions about the bureau’s commitment to supporting those it is mandated to protect.
Internal Mismanagement and High Caseloads
The OIG’s findings suggest that some of the FBI’s deficiencies stem from internal management issues, such as high caseloads among agents in its Crimes Against Children and Human Trafficking program. Agents often found themselves overwhelmed with cases, making it difficult to immediately respond to new allegations or properly document investigative steps.
The report calls for the FBI to re-evaluate the distribution of cases and enhance training for its employees to improve compliance with laws and policies governing child abuse investigations.
Looking Ahead
The OIG report comes as the FBI faces increased scrutiny from Congress and child advocacy groups regarding its handling of child abuse cases. The audit makes 11 recommendations for the FBI to improve its practices, including better oversight, stricter compliance with mandatory reporting laws, and enhanced victim support.
While the FBI has made some progress in addressing the issues identified in the Nassar report, the latest findings underscore the need for more comprehensive reforms. As child safety advocates demand accountability and action, the question remains: Will the FBI rise to the challenge, or will these failures continue to jeopardize the safety and well-being of the most vulnerable?
The Globalists Are All Hat and No Cattle
AMLO Slams US Meddling in Mexico’s Affairs – While American Pols Welcome Mexican Subversion
A recent diplomatic tiff in Mexico illustrates the double standard whereby the Mexican government openly meddles in U.S. immigration policy but then gets offended when the shoe is on the other foot.
Mexico is currently in the midst of a political controversy regarding its judicial system. President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) wants to pass a judicial reform before leaving office on October 1. This reform would put Supreme Court justices up for a vote by the electorate.
Critics of this measure warn it would damage the judicial independence of the Mexican Supreme Court.
This and other reforms can be expected to increase the power of the already-dominant MORENA party.
Ken Salazar, U.S. ambassador to Mexico, got himself involved in the controversy by releasing a declaration issued by the U.S. embassy opposing the judicial reform.
Ambassador Salazar wrote that the reform is a “risk” for Mexico, saying it “threatens the historic commercial relationship” between the two countries and would help the drug cartels “take advantage of inexperienced judges with political motivations.”
The Mexican government responded almost immediately with a diplomatic note sent to the U.S. embassy.
The next day [August 23] AMLO discussed the matter in his morning press conference.
AMLO went on a big spiel about it, but this excerpt sums up his objection to Salazar’s declaration:
“[W]e do not accept any representative of a foreign government to intervene in affairs that only correspond to we Mexicans to resolve.”
I think AMLO is right on this issue. Ambassador Salazar should have stayed out of this.
The proposed Mexican judicial reform, whatever we might think of it, is the business of the government and people of Mexico.
It’s especially inappropriate for the U.S. ambassador to get involved in an internal Mexican political controversy.
According to Article 55 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, of which both the U.S. and Mexico are signatories, “…it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities [diplomats] to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State. They also have a duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of the State.”
So AMLO is right that Salazar shouldn’t meddle in Mexican politics.
But what about Mexico interfering in U.S. affairs?
It’s simply amazing how, for years, Mexico has meddled in U.S. immigration and nationality policy, with almost zero pushback from Americans.
In the 1990s, Mexico actually changed its own nationality law to allow previously-banned dual citizenship.
Why?
Mexican nationality law was specifically changed so that Mexican citizens could be dual citizens of Mexico and the U.S. to vote in U.S. elections in the interests of Mexico.
The result? Mostly crickets chirping in the United States.
It’s almost as though Americans (and especially U.S. politicians) don’t take Mexico seriously as a country that might have its own interests and promote them at our expense.
In addition to the Mexican embassy in D.C., there are 52 Mexican consulates on U.S. soil. It’s the biggest consular network in the world, yet you hardly hear about it.
Mexican diplomats working from these consulates blatantly meddle in U.S. internal politics.
They protect illegal aliens. They justify illegal immigration. They campaign against proposed U.S. legislation.
Mexican consulates promote dual citizenship, striving to win the loyalty of Mexican-Americans — even those born in the United States.
Mexican law, you see, recognizes the child of a Mexican, born anywhere in the world, as being entitled to Mexican citizenship.
I’ve been writing about this for years (see my incomplete Mexican meddling file here ), yet I’ve failed to get many people interested in it.
U.S. politicians don’t defend our sovereignty as AMLO defends that of Mexico.
American politicians are either uninterested in — or even worse, eagerly promote and cooperate with — Mexican interference.
For example, consider Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma’s Republican governor.
Stitt is so excited about his state’s new Mexican consulate that he thinks it’s Oklahoma’s fourth branch of government.
The bottom line is that Mexican meddling in U.S. immigration policy will continue for as long as we allow it.
The Globalists Are All Hat and No Cattle