ANOTHER Activist Behind LGBTQIAAP2S+ Propaganda in Schools Convicted of Child Abuse
(LifeSiteNews) — The LGBT movement in Scotland has been rocked by yet another scandal. Last month, 39-year-old Andrew Easton was convicted at the Aberdeen Sheriff Court after being caught by cybercrime officers on an internet chat talking to someone Easton believed to be a 13-year-old boy.
Easton referred to the boy as “baby boy” and was soliciting explicit photographs from him. He is now a convicted pedophile. He is also, as it turns out, an LGBT activist who co-authored a taxpayer-funded guide on coming out as transgender for children… as young as 13. According to the Daily Mail:
Easton, who was convicted at Aberdeen Sheriff Court last month, helped to produce a guide for LGBT Youth Scotland (LGBTYS), which receives thousands of pounds from the Scottish Government and local authorities. He contributed to an early version of ‘coming out’ guidance issued by the controversial organisation, whose former chief executive James Rennie is serving life for sexually assaulting a baby boy. Schools, local authorities, the Care Inspectorate and government-run health and social care authorities have been given an updated version but LGTBYS admits the original guide, co-written by Easton, may still be in use.
READ: Former teacher gets 5 years in prison after threatening judge over pro-parental rights ruling
Note well: two people associated with the guide on “coming out” have now been convicted of pedophilia. Educational psychologist Carolyn Brown told the Sunday Postthat the guidance co-authored by Easton is “manipulative and influencing” and is packed with “misinformation.” According to the Sunday Post:
LGBT Youth Scotland boast they have “trained” thousands of teachers over LGBT inclusivity. Schools, local authorities, the Care Inspectorate and government-run health and social care authorities made the guide available to children from the age of 13. LGBT Youth Scotland attempted to distance themselves from Easton, who demanded to be called “daddy” and used secure messaging to send messages to his schoolboy victim, and photographs of his private parts.
Easton, who hails from Kennethmont in Aberdeenshire, also distributed 32 videos of children between the ages of four and eight years old to other pedophiles (the photos were considered to be in the serious “category A”). For those crimes, he was sentenced to a paltry Community Payback Order, 200 hours of unpaid work, supervision for three years, and has been put on the sex offenders’ register – for only three years.
As Tory Member of Scottish Parliament Meghan Gallacher stated: “This is a deeply disturbing situation. It is long overdue that we audit just how much money this organisation receives and seek assurances over what safeguarding assessments are in place.” The Scottish government responded by stating that “education authorities are responsible for ensuring visitors undergo disclosure checks and LGBTYS’s safeguarding policy is an operational matter for the organisation.”
READ: New Hampshire Supreme Court sides with school district that hid student’s gender confusion from mom
Alba MSP Ash Regan concurred, stating: “Serious questions must be asked about why Scottish children’s educational guidance is being shaped by unqualified lobby groups that not only overreach their published remit but operate without any apparent oversight.”
We know the answer to that, of course. In many countries, the sexual education of children has been outsourced to radical LGBT groups who create content designed to normalize virtually all sexual practices
Our “sex education” is actually a calculated agenda of corruption in which the innocence of children is deliberately subverted, and they are introduced to a wide range of sex acts as well as gender ideology. Parents have been cut out of the process by the public schools; instead, groups like LGBT Youth Scotland have been given free access to tens of thousands of young minds.
Hundreds of Doctors Resign from British Medical Association for its Support of LGBTQIAAP2S+ Child Mutilations
The British Medical Association (BMA) recently came out to oppose an existing ban on puberty blockers for children in Great Britain, prompting hundreds of doctors in the United Kingdom to resign in protest and disgust.
The physicians who called it quits from the BMA say the union is ignoring evidence-based medicine by continuing to support the grotesque and utterly perverted concept of “changing genders” by taking endocrine-disrupting pharmaceutical drugs that destroy a child’s hormonal system, probably for life.
It is all fun and games until all that drugging and mutilating catches up with a person, and yet BMA leadership think they know better than science and common sense what is safe and effective for a child suffering from gender dysphoria.
The BMA wants the government of the U.K. to lift its puberty blockers for children ban, as well as pause the implementation of the National Health Service’s Case Review.
(Related: Did you know that the British Medical Journal [BMJ], which is run by the BMA, contends that unvaccinated people should be forced to get injected through targeted “behavior interventions?”)
“Not in my name,” disgusted doctors tell BMA
Before this mass exodus, roughly 1,000 senior physicians from across the U.K. published an open letter to BMA chairman and professor Philip Banfield accusing him and the 69-member council that controls the direction of the BMA of passing this new union policy position at a “secretive and opaque” meeting.
That open letter, which now has more than 1,400 senior physician signatures, 900 of which are from BMA members, calls out the doctors’ union for basically doing its own thing without support from a majority of the union’s members.
“We write as doctors to say, ‘not in my name,’” the letter states.
“We are extremely disappointed that the BMA council had passed a motion to conduct a ‘critique’ of the Cass Review and to lobby to oppose its recommendations … It does not reflect the views of the wider membership, whose opinion you did not seek. We understand that no information will be released on the voting figures and how council members voted. That is a failure of accountability to members and is simply not acceptable.”
Concerning the Cass Review, the letter goes on to call it “the most comprehensive review into healthcare for children with gender related distress ever conducted.” Since the BMA has chosen to do nothing but attack the Cass Review, the signatories are now calling on the union to “abandon its pointless exercise” in opposing the review’s recommendations.
“By lobbying against the best evidence we have, the BMA is going against the principles of evidence-based medicine and against ethical practice,” the letter continues.
Many of the comments on The Times in response to the letter are from people who claim to be doctors saying that they “have torn up their membership cards” in response to the BMA’s official position in support of transgender child mutilation.
“As a union, primarily, it is the role of the BMA to represent its members, and not to drive clinical opinion, especially in specialist areas,” one of them wrote. “I am considering resigning after membership of 42 years.”
“I left the BMA partly because of this sort of behaviour on the part of the leadership, having been a member for some thirty years,” said another.
Many others used words like “abysmal” to describe the current leadership structure at the BMA, which is becoming “increasingly bonkers and ideologically captured.” They also called for a “vote of no confidence in BMA leadership” to oust the current controllers of the union.
LGBT child mutilation is one of the sickest perversions in existence and Western leaders are all about normalizing it. Learn more at Evil.news.
Trump Signals Support for Proposal that will Legalize Recreational Marijuana in Florida
(LifeSiteNews) — President Donald Trump is continuing to moderate on social issues.
In a Truth Social post published this past weekend, the former president, who is a resident of Florida, expressed support for a ballot proposal that would legalize marijuana in the Sunshine State.
“In Florida, like so many other states that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalized for adults with Amendment 3. Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the voters, so it should be done correctly,” Trump wrote Saturday.
READ: Trump threatens to jail Mark Zuckerberg if he illegally interferes in 2024 presidential race
While touting his “law and order” platform, Trump further added that “someone should not be a criminal in Florida, when this is legal in so many other states. We do not need to ruin lives [and] waste taxpayer dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them.”
Trump proceeded to call on the Florida state legislature, which is dominated by Republicans 83-36 in the House and 28-12 in the Senate, to “responsibly create laws that prohibit the use of it in public spaces, so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat run cities.”
Trump’s post comes at the same time he was forced to issue a clarification of his opposition to Amendment 4, a Florida ballot proposal that would enshrine abortion-on-demand by overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban and allowing unrestricted abortion up to “viability,” which is usually set at around 24 weeks’ gestation, as well as permitting abortion up to birth for so-called “health” reasons
After pro-lifers decried Trump for stating that six weeks is “too short,” his campaign quickly issued a statement saying he “has not yet said how he will vote on the ballot initiative in Florida, he simply reiterated that he believes six weeks is too short.”
In an interview with Fox News the next day, August 30, Trump admitted that he will vote no on the amendment, which he criticized for allowing the “ridiculous situation” of abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy.
Kamala Harris’ campaign has accused Trump of “brazen flip flops” on marijuana. In a statement, they argued that “as President, his own Justice Department cracked down on marijuana offenses,” such as “withdrawing guidelines to limit prosecutions of marijuana offenses that were legal under state laws” and for “removing medical marijuana protections.”
In 2019, Trump helped pay for an ad campaign warning about the drug’s side effects. His Surgeon General Jerome Adams and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar also advised against marijuana legalization.
Trump’s pivot on the issue suggests he may be seeking to peel off young and minority voters from Harris, who, despite being in favor of the drug now, was attacked by Tulsi Gabbard in the 2020 presidential primary over it. During a debate, Gabbard accused Harris of putting “over fifteen hundred people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.”
In 2022, voters in Arkansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota rejected ballot measures that would have legalized recreational marijuana, which has been linked to cognitive decline and has long been considered a gateway drug that leads to more dangerous narcotics usage. Nineteen states plus the District of Columbia allow recreational use of marijuana at present. Thirteen states have banned it outright.
In April 2024, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration under Joe Biden announced it was easing restrictions on marijuana by reclassifying the drug from a more restricted Schedule I substance to the lesser Schedule III category.
RFK Jr. Forced to Remain on the Ballot in Key Battleground State of Michigan Despite Requesting Withdrawal from the Race
The name of independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will still appear on ballots in Michigan in November, even after withdrawing his presidential bid and endorsing Republican presidential nominee and former president Donald Trump.
In a press conference in Phoenix on Aug. 23, Kennedy suspended his presidential bid and admitted to the public that he no longer saw a path toward victory. Kennedy explained that internal polling showed his candidacy could harm Trump’s chances while inadvertently helping Harris, though recent public polls do not clearly support this claim. Regardless, after several discussions with Trump, he decided to withdraw and support the former president, instead.
(Related: RFK Jr. suspends campaign with singular focus: Ending childhood illness epidemic.)
In line with this, he also sought to remove his name from the ballots in 10 key battleground states.
“In about 10 battleground states, where my presence would be a spoiler, I’m going to remove my name. And I’ve already started that process and urge voters not to vote for me,” Kennedy said.
However, the office of Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, claimed that Kennedy would still be listed as the nominee of the Natural Law Party after the party selected him as its nominee at its state convention back in April.
“Minor party candidates cannot withdraw, so his name will remain on the ballot,” said Cheri Hardmon, a spokeswoman for Benson, in an email on Aug 23. “Michigan Election Law requires presidential electors be selected at the fall state convention. The fall state convention must be held no later than the date of the primary. The Natural Law Party held their convention to select electors for Robert Kennedy Jr. They cannot meet at this point to select new electors since it’s past the primary.”
RFK Jr. faces similar problems in other key battleground states
Similar situations are unfolding in other states where election officials have also indicated it is too late for Kennedy to have his name removed from the ballot.
In North Carolina, the State Board of Elections claimed that Kennedy’s withdrawal came just as ballot printing had begun across the state. As of Aug. 29, approximately 1.73 million ballots were already printed in over 60 counties, including those for military personnel overseas and individuals with vision impairments.
Karen Brinson, the executive director of the State Board of Elections, clarified that removing Kennedy’s name would involve reprinting and redistributing the ballots, which would take at least 13 days and incur extra costs. Considering the tight timeframe and the expenses involved, the board concluded that making the changes was not feasible. This, in turn, resulted in the rejection of Kennedy’s withdrawal.
Similarly, in Wisconsin, the Elections Commission voted to deny Kennedy’s request to be removed from the ballot. The decision was based on Wisconsin law, which states that candidates who have filed nomination papers and qualified for the ballot cannot subsequently withdraw.
As of now, reports also claim that Kennedy may also face difficulties in removing his name from ballots in other battleground states like Nevada.
Follow RFKJr.news for more news about the former presidential candidate.
Watch Lisa Haven’s commentary on Robert F. Kennedy Jr. possibly joining the camp of former President Donald Trump below.
America’s ‘Ukraine Project’ Has Brought Destruction to Slavic People – Moscow
Washington’s ‘Ukraine project’ has brought destruction to Slavic people, Russia’s ambassador to the US, Anatoly Antonov, warned on Monday. He accused the Americans of using Ukrainians as “cannon fodder” in an unwinnable conflict.
He further warned that the White House will face serious consequences if it removes restrictions on Kiev using Western missiles to conduct long range strikes inside Russia.
Moscow considers the Ukraine conflict to be a US-led proxy war against Russia in which Ukrainian soldiers are used as “cannon fodder.” No amount of military hardware donated to Kiev will allow it to prevail militarily, the ambassador said.
“The American ‘Ukraine project’ has brought destruction and entailed huge sacrifices of the Slavic people,” Antonov added. “There is no doubt that Russia will cope with the new challenge to its security and the goals and objectives of the special military operation will be fully implemented.”
Antonov was commenting on the recent trip to the US by senior officials from Kiev, including Andrey Yermak, the chief of staff of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, and Defense Minister Rustem Umerov. According to media reports, they presented the Americans with a list of targets in Russia that they want to attack with Western long-range weapons.
Read more Kiev should not expect more long-range missiles from US – CNN
“Washington’s idea of pitting Europe against Russia through the Ukrainian crisis will not pass,” Antonov said. “The US will not be able to sit it out across the ocean if the current situation escalates into a global conflict.”
Kiev argues that the lack of permission by its weapons donors to conduct long-range strikes puts Ukrainian troops at a disadvantage on the front line. Moscow has warned that it would supply similar military capabilities to enemies of the West if these types of attacks ever happen. The potential escalation would not be limited to the European continent, Antonov warned.
Unlike the UK and France, which donated air-launched long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine, the US has delivered a small number of ground-launched ballistic weapons, which are easier to deploy close to the border through stealth. Kiev has used some of the ATACMS missiles to attack targets in Russia’s Crimea, which the US considers Ukrainian territory.
A Ukrainian MP visiting Washington told CNN that strikes deep inside Russia would be no different from striking Russian border areas, which the US government allowed Kiev to do in late May, because “both are Russian territory.”
READ MORE: NATO warns members against shooting down Russian missiles
American officials have made it clear to the Ukrainians that they would not get “another significant delivery of ATACMS due to the finite number in US inventories,” the network reported. Many of the targets chosen by Kiev are not even within ATACMS range, sources told CNN.
Brazil’s X Ban Double Standard: Lula’s Party Still Posts While Silencing Critics
Brazil’s government, under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has continued to use the social media platform X, even as it enforces a widespread ban against its citizens. This ban, initially enforced to curb “misinformation” and “hate speech,” supposedly aimed to protect public discourse and uphold “democracy.” However, the persistent activity on X by Lula’s party PT Brasil, and the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) starkly contrasts with the punitive measures threatened against ordinary citizens. They’re allowed to talk but the people aren’t allowed to talk back.
The issue is not just in the ban itself but in the implications of its enforcement. The government’s decision to silence potential critics on the platform while allowing pro-government voices to remain active raises serious concerns about fairness and equality before the law. This selective censorship effectively monopolizes the digital conversation, ensuring that only the political elite can disseminate information and engage with the public on X, while opposition voices are stifled.
By controlling who can speak and who can’t, the government is not just regulating a platform but is orchestrating the narrative. This creates an environment where “misinformation” can be selectively defined as anything that contradicts the official government position, regardless of its factual accuracy. Such actions compromise the foundational democratic principle that the public should have access to a plurality of views, especially in a digital age where social media platforms are critical arenas for political discourse.
EXCLUSIVE – Alex Jones Interviews ChatGPT & Its Responses Are Insane!