News

Ex-CNN anchor admits jabs caused harm, but still defends pushing them onto the masses.

After revealing during his News Nation program last week that he’s been suffering from COVID-19 vaccine side effects, ex-CNN anchor Chris Cuomo provided further details into what happened during Tuesday’s edition of the Patrick Bet-David Podcast.

Cuomo, brother of ex-New York Democrat Governor Andrew Cuomo, was first played a video clip of himself berating Americans who refused to take an experimental Covid jab back when he worked at CNN.

After watching the flashback video, Cuomo said, “Apology? Of course, not,” before explaining it “was never personal.”

“This was never as simple as vaccine good, vaccine bad,” he said. “Politics made it that. It put us into a toxic environment, no pun intended, where even today there’s no curiosity about the vaccine. You get a VAERS system which is very imperfect and you don’t have robust government dialogue or investigation of the vaccine. You don’t have political investigation of what happened during the pandemic. What was right, what was wrong?”

Showing he’s still bizarrely living in denial about his blatant vaccine-induced injury, Cuomo claimed, “I don’t have long-vaccine.”

He continued, “People are saying I’ve admitted the vaccine hurt me. I have not admitted that. I don’t know that. Do I now believe that we have data to support the fact that there are thousands of people with adverse effects that are not getting attention, let alone treatment? Yes. And, I fault the government for that.”

“I do have what they call long-Covid,” Cuomo insisted before admitting government officials previously told him they didn’t even know if “long-Covid” is a real thing.

The former CNN anchor noted his doctor told him he has “long-Covid,” and revealed his bloodwork “scared the bejesus” out of him.

“It scared the bejesus out of me to see this glowing micro-clot stuff floating around in my blood. That really shook me up,” Cuomo stated.

Later, Cuomo defended his promotion of the jabs by naively saying he had no reason to distrust the government when the pandemic first began.

Refusing to look reality in the eyes, the news reporter claimed the Covid shots reduced hospitalizations and saved lives.

Cuomo did say he’s open to the possibility that the jabs did more harm than good and also said he’s currently taking a regular dose of the establishment’s favorite medicine to mock as “horse paste,” ivermectin.

“Ivermectin was a boogeyman during Covid. That was wrong. We were given bad information about ivermectin. Why? The entire clinical community knew that ivermectin couldn’t hurt you…” he added.

At the end of the interview, Cuomo stuck to his promotion of the shots and refused to acknowledge the false information being pushed by the establishment was intentional.

The stubborn news anchor also discredited outlets and media personalities who accurately reported on the shots being dangerous and ineffective while they were being introduced.

He said, “Now, there are questions, ‘Oh, no but I knew at the time.’ No, you didn’t! What you knew was there were people telling you to be resistant to what the government was telling you to do.”

Yes, the people who instinctively refused to trust the government were right and they’ll be right again the next time the authoritarians try to unleash their tyranny.

---

The Federal Reserve is a suicide bomber.

If people have learned anything from the past few years of Ivy League elites and TV talking heads feeding them economic predictions, I hope they finally understand that the “experts” are usually wrong and that alternative analysts have a far better track record. Whenever establishment economists make a a call the opposite generally turns out to be true.

By extension, alternative economic predictions are usually well ahead of the curve – What we talk about might be labeled “doom mongering” or “conspiracy theory” today. In three years or less it will be treated as common knowledge and the mainstream “experts” will claim that they “saw it coming all along” while taking credit for financial calls they never made.

This has been a long running pattern and it’s something those of us in the alternative media have come to expect.

For my part, I warned for years about the threat of the impending stagflationary crisis which ultimately struck hard in the “post-pandemic” US. The establishment gatekeepers denied such a thing was possible. When it happened, they claimed it was “transitory.” Now, they argue that a soft landing is imminent and there’s nothing to fear from trillions in helicopter money being pumped into the system. They claim nothing of significance will change.

I also predicted that the Fed would create a Catch-22 scenario in which interest rates are raised into economic weakness while inflationary pressures expand. I suggested that the central bank would keep rates higher for far longer than mainstream analysts claimed. This is exactly what has happened.  My position is simple – The Federal Reserve is a suicide bomber.

Who are you going to believe? Independent economists who have proven correct time and time again? Or, the Ivory Tower guys who have been consistently wrong? I’ll say this: If success in economics was actually based on merit and correct analysis, people like Paul Krugman or Janet Yellen would have been out of work a long time ago.

As for the ongoing narrative of a soft landing, the question I have to ask is HOW exactly they are going to make that happen? First, let’s clarify why central bankers are the problem (along with the governments they covertly influence)…

Central Banks Are At The Core Of Economic Troubles

There are only two logical reasons for central bank induced inflation: To hide the effects of a massive deflationary slowdown caused by too much debt, or, to deliberately trigger a currency collapse. Both motives could apply at the same time.

Central bankers don’t just facilitate this inflation at the behest of governments, they tell governments what to expect and what to promote to the public. Anyone that claims otherwise has an agenda. Central banks write their own policy and control their own mechanics. Governments have no say whatsoever in their operations, as Alan Greenspan once openly admitted.

The reality is, governments go begging hat in hand to central bankers and the banks decide whether or not to give them that sweet stimulus nectar. Politicians engage in collusion with central banks on a regular basis and they defer to bankers on an array of economic decisions. Economic advisers to the US president almost always include high level central bankers who then cycle right back into the Federal Reserve.

Central banks and their private international counterparts are in control, political leaders are simply pawns. Whenever there’s a crash the public focuses on government while the central banks fade into the background and avoid all scrutiny.

Inflation Addiction And The Ultimate Catch-22

Inflation for banks is a tool for fiscal change, but also social change. It’s not a coincidence that financial crisis events always lead to more centralization of global power into fewer and fewer hands; this is by design. Inflation allows the establishment to delay or initiate a crisis with greater precision.

An even more powerful tool is the WITHHOLDING of stimulus and cheap money once an economy is addicted to the flow of fiat.

I have been arguing for many years that central banks were constructing a situation in which the system is utterly dependent on fiat stimulus in order to maintain the illusion of growth. If the bankers return to lower rates and QE, inflation will continue to explode. If they stay with higher rates and a trickle of stimulus then a global crash is inevitable.

It’s one or the other, there is no soft landing when trillions in money creation are at play in such a short period of time. Central banks must return to near zero rates and QE if they hope to prevent a debt implosion. This might seem like a soft landing scenario at first, but when CPI ramps up (as it is starting to now at the mere mention of rate cuts) consumers will be hit even harder.

I’ll ask this question once again because I don’t think some people are getting it: What if their goal is to create a crash?

The Great Global Slowdown Has Already Started

In the past six months both the World Trade Organization and the World Banks released statements warning of an impending global slowdown. After an initial surge in exports and imports caused by massive pandemic stimulus measures, the effects of the helicopter money are now fading. By the end of 2024, global trade will register the slowest growth since the 1990s.

The UN also suggested growth deceleration was coming in the next year due to falling investments and subdued global trade. Keep in mind that the alternative media has been warning about this outcome for the past couple years at least as covid funding dried up. Globalist institutions are simply informing the public at the last minute; too little, too late.

The World Bank asserts that global trade is flatlining and international trade data supports this theory. China’s export market plunged by 7.5% in March, far more than expected and well below the 2.3% decline predicted by a major poll of mainstream economists by Reuters.

By the end of 2023 European exports declined by 8.8% compared to a year earlier and the union barely avoided a recession (according to official numbers). All hopes in Europe rest on the possibility of a steeper drop in inflation and central bank interest rate cuts. As I have been saying since 2021, don’t get too excited about banks lowering rates. It’s not going to happen at the pace that investors want, it’s not going to bring back QE anytime soon and when they do cut rates CPI will immediately spike once again causing panic among consumers.

I suspect that, after an initial rate cut event and an inflation resurgence, central banks will return to tightening with even higher rates in 2025.

In the US, a net importer of goods rather than a primary exporter, consumer volume has been in steep decline. Due to inflation, Americans are buying less goods while paying more money. And this is how inflation skews economic data. Higher prices on goods make retail sales look great, but in reality people are simply paying a higher price for the same amount of products (or less products).

Consumer credit data shows a steep decline in debt spending; credit card delinquency is at all time highs, APR is at all time highs and debt growth has collapsed in the past couple of months. Considering that the American consumer is a primary driver of global exports, it makes sense that international trade is now plummeting. Consumers are broke. The covid stimulus party is officially over and inflation is dragging the market down.

The IMF has recently noted the signs of global slowdown but, as usual, they argue that a “soft landing” is imminent. In other words, they claim there will be no serious repercussions for the economy. They do mention one interesting caveat in their analysis – The danger of global conflicts “derailing” the supposed recovery.

War leads to rising protectionism, the IMF says, and protectionism is a big no-no. In a world economy based on forced interdependency this is partially true, but the bigger picture is being ignored. The world economy should be built on redundancy, not interdependency. Interdependency creates weakness and the potential for dangerous domino effects. This is a fact that globalists would never willingly admit to.

For now, it appears that the global slowdown will become undeniable in the next six months, either right before the US elections in November, or right after. Central banks have chosen to create this Catch-22 and they are, for whatever reason, stalling the big drop. My theory? They have a scapegoat (or scapegoats) in mind and they’re waiting for the right time to unleash the next chaotic event. Covid is gone, so they’re going to need a war, multiple wars, or political conflict in the west and in many other parts of the world as a distraction.

---

EMERGENCY FINANCIAL NEWS: Economist Warns The Collapse Has Already Begun – Will Be Worse Than The Great Depression

---

A single mother with only one spare bedroom took in an entire Chilean family — so liberal!

The city of Denver is encouraging residents to take in destitute illegal aliens and has even set up a hotline for people who want to volunteer to house them.

A charity called Hope Has No Borders “began pairing migrant workers and their families with hosts in Colorado in late 2023. Now, with help from the United Way, getting paired up is a simple phone call away by dialing 211,” Fox31 Denver reported Saturday.

But instead of well-off limousine liberals taking them in, the burden has fallen to struggling families.

The report details how Erin Lennon, “a single mom with a spare bedroom”, gladly took in a family of four Chilean illegals after noticing them camping out in airports and on the streets because all the shelters are over capacity.

Lennon’s young son “was nervous at first about the idea of taking in strangers,” but she claimed, “Some of the greatest things that, you know, that you do or have done, has been involved with some risk.”

This illegal alien housing initiative has been rolled out in several blue cities nationwide.

For example, because of Massachusetts’ “right to shelter” laws, homeless illegals began taking residence in the Boston Airport, leading Governor Maura Healey (D) to ask citizens to take them into their homes.

One Boston liberal took in a Haitian migrant family and delighted in the fact that they provide cooking services for her.

“This is great! It’s like having your own personal chef!” she told NBC10 Boston in February.

And under Michigan’s “Newcomer Renter Subsidy” program, “eligible” households can receive up to $500 every month in taxpayer money to house illegal alien “newcomers.”

Denver began begging residents to take in illegals earlier this year as the sanctuary city enacted budget cuts in wake of the influx of 40,000 illegals, costing taxpayers $180 million.

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

The pharmaceutical giant voluntarily withdrew its “marketing authorization” in the European Union earlier this week, with similar actions expected soon in the UK and other approving countries.

In yet another damning development for the ‘safe and effective’ crowd, AstraZeneca has announced the worldwide withdrawal of its Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, branded as Vaxzevria, due to a rare but serious side effect. This decision marks the end of the vaccine once hailed as a “triumph for British science” by Boris Johnson and credited with saving over six million lives, The Telegraph reports.

The pharmaceutical giant voluntarily withdrew its “marketing authorization” in the European Union earlier this week, with similar actions expected soon in the UK and other approving countries. The move, described by the company as driven by “commercial reasons,” coincides with the availability of newer vaccines designed to combat emerging variants.

That said, the timing of the withdrawal follows months of intense scrutiny over a rare side effect. In a recent High Court document, the company admitted that Vaxzevria could, in very rare instances, cause Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), which has been linked to at least 81 deaths in the UK. Despite these admissions, AstraZeneca maintains that the decision to pull the vaccine is unrelated to the ongoing legal challenges or its potential side effects.

“We are incredibly proud of the role Vaxzevria played in ending the global pandemic. According to independent estimates, over 6.5 million lives were saved in the first year of use alone and over three billion doses were supplied globally,” the company said in a statement. “Our efforts have been recognised by governments around the world and are widely regarded as being a critical component of ending the global pandemic.”

The European Medicines Agency has begun the process to formally withdraw the vaccine, reflecting an expected move away from monovalent vaccines, which target only the original COVID-19 strain. Marco Cavaleri, head of vaccines at the agency, emphasized that this is a standard procedure for vaccines that are no longer in use.

Legal experts and victims, however, see the withdrawal as a vindication of their long-held concerns over the vaccine’s safety. “To those who we represent, all of whom have suffered bereavement or serious injury as a result of the AstraZeneca vaccine, this decision to withdraw marketing authorisation, ending the usage of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the EU, will be welcomed,” said Sarah Moore, a partner at Leigh Day, the law firm representing many of the claimants.

“It will be seen as a decision linked with AstraZeneca’s recent admission that the vaccine can cause TTS, and the fact that regulators across the world suspended or stopped usage of the vaccine following concerns regarding TTS.”

Victims and their families have reported a range of severe reactions, from fatal thrombosis to lasting disabilities, sparking a debate over the adequacy of vaccine safety monitoring and compensation for vaccine injuries.

Kate Scott, whose husband suffered a permanent brain injury after receiving the vaccine, expressed mixed feelings: “AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine no longer being used in the UK or Europe, and soon the rest of the world, means no one else will suffer from this awful adverse reaction,” she said. “They say it is for commercial reasons, but maybe it’s because it can no longer be seen as being within the acceptable safety parameters, with 445 confirmed cases of VITT, 81 of these fatal in the UK alone.“

The government’s vaccine damage payment scheme has been criticized for not providing sufficient compensation, prompting calls for reform. “This is an important regulatory step, but still our clients remain without fair compensation. We will continue to fight for the compensation our clients need and campaign for reform of the vaccine damage payment scheme.,” Moore added.

---

EMERGENCY FINANCIAL NEWS: Economist Warns The Collapse Has Already Begun – Will Be Worse Than The Great Depression

---

Vicious cycle of decreased consumer spending, leading to decreased economic activity, leading to decreased jobs, leading to decrease consumer spending has taken hold.

In a video posted May 1, Jeff Snider of Eurodollar University broke down the disastrous state of the economy from the perspective of job availability – a key indicator of the financial health of a society.

“American workers know that there are no jobs to go to, so they’re no longer quitting in the same fashion they had been,” Snider said. “Remember the ‘great resignation’? Yeah that’s a long-distant memory. Workers know that if they lose their job or choose to leave their job, it is very tough going out there.”

Snider discussed how statistics are being misrepresented to make the economy seem rosy when it’s actually never been more dreary.

“We get so many anecdotes and even mainstream stories about confusion over how the jobs number looks really good on paper, how the statistics come out like payrolls and suggests the jobs market is booming, labor, employment, everything is just terrific, except when you actually talk to people, especially anyone who’s been unfortunately laid off, or someone who’s looking for a job, it’s an entirely different picture,” he said.

The economic analyst discussed the dismal numbers related to the hiring and quitting of workers.

“While the government only reports on job openings and labor turnover, the only number that anyone pays attention to is the first one, job openings, but it’s not worth your time, the one you need to focus on and pay very close attention to, that’s hires,” Snider said.

He gave some examples of mainstream news articles chronicling the tribulations of accredited and experienced workers who cannot find work anywhere, despite their credentials.

“It seems like the only places that are actually hiring, outside of maybe a state and federal government, some government agency, is waiters and bartenders, you have to go to Starbucks in order to get a job, except maybe no longer Starbucks,” he said.

The analyst then reported on the recent earnings of the big coffee chain, indicating that even the food-service giant is seeing a ‘challenging operating environment’ where customer levels are falling in the ‘deteriorating economic outlook’, according to the Starbucks earnings report Snider read.

He discussed how consumers are becoming ever more discriminating with their spending as price pressures increase.

“This is not an inflationary economy, this is an economy that is absolutely struggling, and we can feel it in so many different ways,” Snider said.

He laid out why the economy is not genuinely inflationary. He said it’s because there is not an offset of income. Rather the situation is so bad because people are not earning more, yet prices are going up in order for businesses to just stay afloat.

Snider then discussed how even the restaurant industry, an area that had been doing relatively well over the last few years, is now seeing financial trouble on the horizon. Hiring freezes, decrease in sales and potential layoffs in the near future are all taking place in the industry.

He laid out how this is not a U.S. problem, rather a global crisis that did not originate in the U.S., but has migrated here since 2020.

Snider also discussed how the economy is locked into a self-multiplying doom loop.

“Now consumers are buckling, in large part because companies are experiencing a weak environment and are having to take substantial steps in order to control their own costs, which has led to a prolonged hiring freeze already, which has only made the consumer situation even worse,” he said. “And we’re getting locked into that vicious cycle.”

---

Breaking! Private Bank Accounts To Be Seized Under CBDC Global Currency Plan

---

“If you don’t want these types of accidents to occur, stay in your countries!”

As the hordes of foreigners continue to make their way to Biden’s America, mayhem and tragedy befall many of them while they are still in Mexico.

Here are four recent examples.

SEVERAL HUNDRED FOUND IN STOREHOUSE

In the state of Mexico, police discovered a group of over 200 abandoned non-Mexicans crowded into a storehouse, waiting to be taken to the U.S. border.

“In the storehouse 208 persons were located: 10 minors, 28 women and 170 men of Egypt, Cuba, India, Palestine, Nepal, Venezuela, Honduras, Guatemala, Ecuador, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran and the Dominican Republic,” Milenio reported.

MEXICANS COMPLAIN ABOUT ILLEGALS CAMPING IN THE STREETS

Even in Mexico, there are xenophobic people who don’t appreciate the benefits of diversity!

Tuxtla Gutierrez is a city in the state of Chiapas, which borders Guatemala. Some residents don’t want foreign illegal aliens camping in their streets, according to Mexican media.

“Inhabitants of the Lomas de Venado neighborhood in Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, request authorities to relocate the migrants, whom they say have been arriving and camping in the streets for weeks,” Milenio reported.

THREE SALVADORANS LEFT DEAD IN HIT AND RUN

In the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca, on the Panamerican Highway, three Salvadorans passing through Mexico never made it to the U.S. because they were hit by a truck.

“Three Salvadoran migrants died and another foreigner was wounded after being hit by a trailer of a double tractor-trailer….the presumably responsible driver of the accident escaped without helping the affected,” Milenio reported.

The article explains why more migrants are walking along the highway: “The impossibility of advancing in a bus on their way to the northern border of Mexico obliges thousands of migrants to walk on the edge of the highway, risking, as in this occasion, their life.”

The “impossibility” mentioned in the piece could refer to the crackdown on migrants in Mexico. But the fact that “thousands” are walking on the road shows plenty are still getting through.

THREE VENEZUELANS FALL OFF TRAIN AND DIE

In Nazareno, a town in the northern state of Durango, three Venezuelans fell off a train and died.

“Two Venezuelan migrant girls, 2 and 4 years of age, fell from a moving train and lost their lives in the community of Nazareno… while a young man of 18 years of age who also fell from the train car was taken to a hospital alive, but lost the battle upon receiving medical attention,” Milenio reported.

Just how exactly did this happen?

“According to early versions of what occurred, a group of migrants had gotten off the train to eat in this town located south of Lerdo. When they saw the train beginning to move a little they decided to board the train car. The parents of the girls struggled to board the train with the help of the young Venezuelan who was on top of the car. In a moment the train made an abrupt movement just when they were passing the girls up, which made them lose their balance and the three fell from a height of about six meters.”

Who can be blamed for this tragedy?

The Biden administration invited them.

Mexico allowed it.

The parents chose to make the trip.

In the words of a reader in the comments section: “If you don’t want these types of accidents to occur, stay in your countries!”

---

Aleksandr Dugin, Alex Jones, and Tucker Carlson Expose the Secrets of the Transhumanist Death Cult