UK Government & NHS Infected Blood Scandal Chronicled in Massive Inquiry
Between 1970 and 1998 those receiving blood transfusions and blood products such as Factor 8 in the UK were knowingly infected with HIV and hepatitis B, C and D, according to a five-year, seven-volume, 2527-page Infected Blood Inquiry published Wednesday.
“The scale of what happened is horrifying. The most accurate estimate is that more than 3,000 deaths are attributable to infected blood, blood products and tissue,” the inquiry said on page 2 of Volume 1.
The inquiry consists of seven parts, Volume 1: ‘Overview and Recommendations’ at 291 pages, Volume 2: ‘People’s Experiences and Treloar’s’ at 214 pages, Volume 3, 4 and 5: all titled ‘What happened and why?’ at 476 pages, 480 pages and 328 pages respectively, Volume 6: ‘Response of Government and Public Bodies’ at 438 pages and Volume 7: ‘Response of Government’ at 300 pages.
Volume 7 lists a litany of instances where government destroyed documents related to in scandal.
Volume 4 chronicles government involvement in the scandal.
“…it [the government] failed to discharge its fundamental duty to ensure the safety of the public,” the inquiry says on page 116 of Volume 4.
The inquiry gave numbers on types of viral infections the victims of the medical scandal endured, followed by 34 bullet points on why the infection of patents with bleeding disorders and those in need of transfusions were ‘needless’.
“There were around 4,000 to 6,000 people with bleeding disorders in the UK at any one time. Around 1,250 were infected with HIV. The best estimate is that this included 380 children. Almost all infected with HIV were also infected with Hepatitis C and some with Hepatitis B and Hepatitis D as well. Three quarters of these 1,250 adults and children have died. A larger number still (between 2,400 and 5,000 people with bleeding disorders) who were not infected by HIV received blood products infected with one or more hepatitis viruses, and developed chronic Hepatitis C,” the inquiry says on page 2 of Volume 1.
The inquiry also detailed how the official stance on viral infection via blood transfusion and blood products as being ‘inadvertent’ was dishonest and untrue.
“Numerous documents from the Department of Health in the time periods discussed above also referred to the infection of people with HIV or Hepatitis C from blood or blood products being “inadvertent”. To suggest, in this context, that something was inadvertent is to suggest that it was accidental and unintentional. It hints at something that could not have been known about – a mishap, a chance by-product. Yet the risks of transmission of hepatitis were well known. Such transmission was not the purpose of the treatment, but that it might result was well recognised by clinicians and within government,” the inquiry says on page 173 to 174 of Volume 1. “It had been known for years in medical and public health circles. To characterise it as inadvertent is thus to downplay the significance of what happened. In their repeated use of these lines to take, successive governments were more concerned about reputational damage than openness and honesty; more defensive than candid; more interested in avoiding financial exposure than in admitting shortcomings.”
The inquiry also broke down numbers of various viral infections from various forms of blood and blood product transfusions.
“People who were infected by transfusions, rather than by blood products, were infected in even greater numbers. Between 80 and 100 were infected with HIV after a blood transfusion. Approximately 26,800 were infected with Hepatitis C after a blood transfusion, often linked with childbirth or surgery, but also from transfusions to treat thalassemia, sickle disease, or leukaemia, or tissue transfer. It has not been possible to estimate the number of people infected with chronic Hepatitis B due to limited data,” the inquiry says on page 2 of Volume 1.
Dr. John Campbell analyzed the scandal in the midst of the recent revelations.
The inquiry has led some to say children were treated like guinea pigs.
BOMBSHELL: Bayer’s Black Ops Division Of Monsanto Exposed
Watch: Jon Stewart Defends RINOs Against ‘Trump Cancel Culture’
Once-a-week Daily Show host Jon Stewart tried claiming cancel culture in America is being led by the MAGA movement against RINO politicians, not by the leftist mob.
Flipping reality on its head during his latest episode, Stewart claimed conservatives have a “victimization complex” before defending the corrupt ex-Wyoming Congresswoman Liz Cheney – daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney.
Jon Stewart says that cancel culture does not exist … except for the cancel culture perpetuated by Trump. He cites Liz Cheney, Chris Christie, and Mitt Romney as examples of cancel culture victims. pic.twitter.com/UFdakJY0MF
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) May 21, 2024
“It turns out when it comes to cancel culture, the ones who smelt it dealt it,” Stewart joked without a hint of self-awareness.
The comedian went on to claim Donald Trump is “canceling” anyone on the right who stands up to him.
In reality, the populist MAGA movement is still trying to filter out the establishment two-party sellouts in the Republican Party so Trump’s agenda isn’t stonewalled if re-elected.
Among other GOP shills Stewart oddly defended were ex-New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and former Utah Senator Mitt Romney.
It’s not shocking to see the establishment support the politicians it has bought out, but it does expose the Daily Show as another propaganda arm of the uniparty.
Mothers Exposed to Fluoride Birth Brain Damaged Babies — Study
A study published Wednesday has found that pregnant women with higher levels of the drug fluoride in their bodies give birth to children with higher rates of neurological-based behavioral problems.
“These findings suggest that prenatal fluoride exposure may increase risk of neurobehavioral problems among children living in an optimally fluoridated area in the US,” the study said in the ‘Meaning’ section.
The data indicates that with certain levels of fluoride, mothers basically double the risk of having clinically-damaged, misbehaving children. This is the first study on U.S. specific outcomes of prenatal fluoride exposure and the effects it has on children’s neurobehavioral outcomes.
“In this cohort study of 229 pregnant women and their children, a 0.68 mg/L (ie, 1 IQR) increase in specific gravity–adjusted maternal urinary fluoride during pregnancy was associated with nearly double the odds of T scores for total child neurobehavioral problems being in the borderline clinical or clinical range,” the study said in the ‘Findings’ section.
The importance of this study stems from the fact that other research out of Canada and Mexico has indicated that children exposed to fluoride in the womb have poorer neurodevelopment characteristics than non-fluoridated children. This study specifically looks at the U.S. population.
The study was conducted via analyzing urine specimens which were collected from over 200 pregnant women to test for levels of fluoride, then analyzing the children’s neurobehavioral aptitude via the Preschool Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), which included composite scores for Total Problems, Internalizing Problems, and Externalizing Problems.
“This prospective cohort study utilized urine samples archived from 2017 to 2020 and neurobehavioral data assessed from 2020 to 2023 from the Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) pregnancy cohort, which consisted of predominately Hispanic women residing in Los Angeles, California,” the study said in the ‘Design, Setting, and Participants’ section.
It was found that fluoride in pregnant mothers does indeed have a positive correlation with clinical outcomes manifesting as neurological behavioral issues in the children.
“In this prospective cohort study of mother-child pairs in Los Angeles, California, prenatal fluoride exposure was associated with increased neurobehavioral problems. These findings suggest that there may be a need to establish recommendations for limiting fluoride exposure during the prenatal period,” the study said in the ‘Conclusions and Relevance’ section.
The study has shown that even at levels below U.S. water fluoridation concentrations, brain damage in children occurs.
“…findings from recent studies conducted in Mexico and Canada8–11 suggest that fluoride exposure at lower US-relevant levels may also be associated with poorer neurodevelopment,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section. “Specifically, higher prenatal fluoride exposure in Canada and/or Mexico has been associated with lower IQ among children aged 3 to 4 years in Canada10 and children aged 6 to 12 years in Mexico,9 increased symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among children aged 6 to 12 years,12 poorer executive function among children aged 3 to 5 years,13 and poorer performance on measures of global cognition among 12- and 24-month-old boys.14 A recent systematic review conducted by the National Toxicology Program reported “with moderate confidence that higher fluoride exposure…is consistently associated with lower IQ in children.”15
Infowars has previously reported on the disastrous results of water fluoridation.
“Fluoride levels in community drinking water systems in the US have been adjusted to prevent dental caries since 1945.1 Currently, 73% of the US receives fluoridated water at a targeted concentration of 0.7 mg/L,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.
While the researchers didn’t call for a complete end to water fluoridation, they did however conclude by discussing the limiting of fluoride consumption for pregnant mothers.
“These findings suggest that there may be a need to establish recommendations for limiting exposure to fluoride from all sources during the prenatal period, a time when the developing brain is known to be especially vulnerable to injury from environmental insults,” the study said in the ‘Conclusions’ section.
Infowars acknowledges the harmful effects of the drug fluoride, and sells water filters to remove it.
Learn Why HHS Head Hid Evidence Exposing Fluoride Poisoning the Water Supply
Breaking! WEF Founder Klaus Schwab Steps Down As Chairman, Will Take ‘Non-Executive’ Role
You’ll own nothing in retirement and be happy’…
Wit the organization he founded 50 years ago bringing in nearly $500 million in revenue in the year ending March 2023 (and sitting on a neat pile of 200 million Swiss francs cash), Klaus Schwab will own some things as he reportedly steps back from his role running the World Economic Forum has has headed since 1971.
Semafor reports that Schwab announced his intentions to step down as executive chairman in an email to staff on Tuesday that was shared with Semafor by a person connected to the organization.
The change in his role is pending approval by the Swiss government but should be finalized ahead of the WEF’s annual meeting in 2025.
Schwab, now 86, will be transitioning to a role as non-executive chairman.
But Globalists should not worry about their agenda as Semafor reports that Schwab has seeded his organization with various family members to take up the tyrannical new world order torch – Schwab’s children appointed to high-ranking positions and his wife Hilde heading the organization’s foundation and awards ceremonies in Davos.
Will Schwab and Soros retire on a deserted island together to watch the end of the chaotic world they enabled from a distance?
Destroying Our Connection to God with Gene Editing Injections
A viral video which claims to be a leaked 2005 presentation to the DOD by American geneticist Dean Hamer shows a man briefing a room of men about the VMAT2 gene, the God gene, and how it can be suppressed with the use of vaccines.
Also:
Is Alex Jones Really Psychic? — “God Told Me it Was 4 AM”
On the Monday show, Alex Jones discussed the metaphysical sense humans have, and how he’s become more tuned into the unseen power.
Don’t miss:
Globalists May Release New Bird Flu Strain In Attempt To Stop Trump, Warns Edward Dowd