10 vs 2: German Teens Hospitalized by Migrant Gang, One in ‘Acute Danger of Death’
Police in Germany have launched an appeal to locate a gang of around 10 migrant men suspected of hospitalizing two young victims in a brutal assault on Sunday night.
The incident occurred in the North Rhine-Westphalia town of Bad Oeynhausen at around 1:30 a.m. when a group of young migrants confronted two males aged 19 and 20 in the spa town’s park.
Following an altercation, the public prosecutor’s office explained how the suspects punched the victims to the floor before kicking them as they lay defenseless on the ground.
After witnesses called the police, the group casually walked from the crime scene toward the town center.
According to a press release by Bielefeld Police Headquarters, the migrant gang comprised around 10 people, all of whom were male and between 19 and 20 years old. They were described as “Southern,” a phrase often used in Germany to describe men of Maghreb or Arab origin. Some were dressed in Adidas designer tracksuits.
The 20-year-old victim was hospitalized in critical condition after sustaining multiple, serious head injuries. He is in “acute danger of death,” according to the authorities.
An investigation has been launched into bodily harm and attempted homicide involving serious bodily harm and is being conducted by the Bielefeld public prosecutor’s office and the homicide unit of Bielefeld Police.
The migrant gang members have been encouraged to turn themselves in voluntarily; however, no such offering has yet been made.
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War
Bannon to Serve Prison Term at Facility with Violent Inmates
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon will serve his four-month prison sentence at a facility in Connecticut known for housing violent offenders.
YourNews reported that Bannon, a former advisor to President Donald Trump, will be held at the Federal Correctional Institution Danbury (FCI Danbury) instead of a minimum-security prison camp typically reserved for nonviolent offenders. This is because he is facing an ongoing criminal case in New York.
The facility where Bannon is expected to serve his sentence has housed violent offenders, raising concerns about his safety and security during his incarceration. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Danbury houses a total of 1,065 inmates. Approximately one-third of this total are sex offenders, while under 40 percent were convicted on drug-related charges as reported by the News Times.
The prison in the Constitution State has a history of housing inmates convicted of serious crimes. The New Haven Register recounted one male inmate who was convicted of sexually abusing a child and threatening to kill a federal judge. He was indicted again this month for sending threatening communications to a court employee.
In another instance, a female inmate formerly incarcerated in FCI Danbury for “murder with a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime” entered a guilty plea. According to a press release from the Department of Justice, the plea followed her assault of another inmate with a weapon fashioned from two razor blades and a broken pencil.
“As Bannon prepares to report to the Danbury facility, questions remain about his ability to navigate the challenging environment,” YourNews continued. “The decision to place him in such a setting underscores the severity of his ongoing legal issues and the implications of his conviction.”
Bannon ordered to report to FCI Danbury on July 1
Bannon, a prominent figure in the Trump administration who later hosted “Bannon’s War Room,” was convicted of contempt of Congress in July 2022 after failing to comply with a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 Select Committee. His impending imprisonment at FCI Danbury marks a significant moment in his legal battles.
It also followed a judge’s order for Bannon to report to prison by July 1. In a June 6 decision, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols of the District Court for D.C. ruled that Bannon should serve his jail sentence at the soonest. According to the magistrate, he did not believe the “original basis” for his stay of the imposition of Bannon’s sentence existed any longer, following an appeals court rejecting Bannon’s appeal in May and upholding his conviction. (Related: Judge orders Steve Bannon to report to prison on July 1 to begin serving sentence for ginned-up “crime” for which no Democrat is ever prosecuted.)
Nichols’ decision also sided with a motion filed by federal prosecutors. They argued that there was “no legal basis” for the continued stay of Bannon’s sentence after his conviction was upheld.
Bannon appeared in person before Nichols on June 6, when the ruling instructing the former Trump advisor to report to prison was announced. He was unfazed as the federal magistrate read the decision, in contrast to his lawyer David Schoen who was raising his voice.
Trump himself condemned the sentence on Bannon in a post on Truth Social, calling it a “total and complete American tragedy.” He suggested that instead of his former chief strategist, members of the Jan. 6 Select Committee should be prosecuted instead.
Head over to Fascism.news for similar stories.
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War
VIDEO: Trump Calls Out Fake News for Covering up Biden Blunders
On the Monday show Alex Jones played a clip from a Donald Trump speech where the former president discussed how Joe Biden falls down and acts incoherent but the media claims he’s fine, despite also claiming Trump is senile.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War
EU to Ban Bisphenol-A in Food Packaging
European Union member states have approved a draft ban on bisphenol-A (BPA), a synthetic organic compound that is a common component of reusable plastic food containers and food packaging.
The substance has been controversial for years, and was banned in baby bottles in 2011. Several EU member states, including Austria and France, already have full bans in place.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Environment Agency (EEA) have claimed that the substance interferes with the endocrine system—potentially causing fertility, growth, and metabolic problems—as well as the immune system. It is also capable of migrating, in small amounts, from the plastic to the food in the container—leading to its human consumption.
The agencies have been lowering the recommended intake of the substance over years of investigation. According to the latest findings, published in April 2023, the current recommended intake of 0.2 nanograms per kilogram (ng/kg) of body weight had “potential harmful effects on the immune system.”
The proposal, put forward by the EU Commission, also follows a public consultation launched in February.
“This prohibition will mainly apply to the use of bisphenol-A in packaging, such as the coating used in metal cans. The use of bisphenol-A will also be prohibited in consumer items such as reusable plastic bottles for beverages, water distribution refrigerators, or other kitchen items,” the Commission detailed in a statement.
The ban includes an 18-month transition period for implementation after it goes into force.
Consumers have become increasingly concerned about bisphenol-A, with many brands already offering BPA-free products.
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War
BREAKING: Documents Show Government Knew Covid Shot Takes Over the Human Body
On the Monday Alex Jones Show, Jones commented on a video by Dr. John Campbell regarding the Covid vaccination taking over the entire human body with it’s gene altering technology.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War
Nurses Sue UK’s NHS After Being Forced to Change in Front of ‘Transgender’ Male
(LifeSiteNews) — On June 22, the Daily Mail reported that nurses in the United Kingdom were informed by their bosses that they needed to get with the transgender program and accept men in their changing rooms – fast. The headline: “‘You need to be re-educated’: That’s how a group of NHS nurses say hospital chiefs reacted when they complained that a transgender colleague – who shared their women’s changing room – stared as they got undressed.”
As one woman put it on X (formerly Twitter): “We went from #MeToo to ‘reeducate yourself to like men staring at you as you get undressed at work’ in 5 years, and I doubt it’s an accident.”
The nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital—who were long-serving employees—complained because a 26-year-old transgender-identifying man was acting “intimidating” in the women’s changing room. He stared at their breasts while they got undressed and hung around “longer than necessary” in the changeroom. The man—who calls himself “Rose”—has not undergone any “sex change” surgeries and told colleagues that he was trying to get his girlfriend pregnant. The nurses described him as “a sexually active biological male.”
When the nurses brought forward their complaints, however, they were dismissed; the Mail reports that hospital bosses “allegedly told the nurses they needed to get ‘educated’ and broaden their minds.” A human resources manager informed them that they needed to be “more inclusive.” As a result, eight of the 26 nurses that signed the original complaint letter are “launching an unprecedented employment tribunal against the NHS Trust that employs them, claiming harassment, indirect discrimination, victimisation, and human rights violations.”
Four of the eight spoke to the Mail about their experiences, which have been ongoing since August 2023.
“It’s disgraceful that nurses are ending up in tears prior to their shifts. We are there to be an emotional support for patients who are about to undergo surgery, and it’s very difficult to do that if you’re in a state of distress from having to change in front of a male,” said 34-year-old surgery nurse Bethany Hutchinson. “I think women need to stop being fearful about this and use their voice. We have fought for so long to get women’s rights but it’s just gone backwards, and I’m not prepared to see that.”
Being told that they needed to be reeducated was particularly offensive to Hutchinson. “It is so offensive to us because we are all educated – we need a degree in order to do this job and some of us have multiple degrees. We’ve got very intelligent people on our ward so it was disgusting for them to say something like that to us.”
Another nurse, Lisa Lockey, told the press: “We’ve all been really uneasy about [coming forward]. We know there’s a lot of trans activists who will probably hate us for what we’re doing. But it’s not against trans people [sic]. This is about protecting a female’s space. It’s not to hurt anybody, we want a safe policy.” The nurses have to change their clothes before and after shifts as an infection control measure, and many female staff have taken to using the cubicles to avoid changing in front of the man identifying as “Rose.”
Forty-five-year-old nurse Tracy Hooper noted that the man’s presence in the changeroom “makes me feel on edge,” explaining: “You scan the changing room before you start to undress. It’s just very uncomfortable. I don’t want to get changed in front of a biological man, and I don’t want to see him getting changed either. We’re not asking for him to go in the male changing room either, he should be provided for.”
One nurse, who was sexually abused as a little girl, has PTSD and struggles to be alone around men. The man’s presence in the changeroom brought her close to tears. “I was rummaging in my bag trying to find my lanyard and keys for the locker when a man’s voice behind me said, ‘Are you not getting changed yet?’” she said. “He stood there, two metres from me, with a scrub top on and with tight black boxer shorts with wholes in them and asked [again] whether I was getting changed yet… I felt glued to me seat, I could not move. My hands started to sweat. I was petrified and felt sick and began hyperventilating.”
Right now, the Darlington Memorial Hospital permits people to choose whichever facilities they believe match their “gender” – and it is driving women from their own facilities. A fourth nurse, Annice Grundy, noted: “I won’t get changed in that changing room anymore—I’ve found somewhere else to change, which I don’t feel I should have to do.” Another reported: “We don’t feel safe because we strip down to our underwear and Rose doesn’t just stay by his locker. He walks around in his boxer shorts.”
As the Mail reported: “Today the nurses also say they are worried about the impact on foreign-born hospital staff with different religious backgrounds, who had taken to wearing leggings and tops underneath their uniforms to avoid their bodies being seen, despite the discomfort this causes during work.” This, of course, is not only true for “foreign-born hospital staff,” but also for Christian nurses – and anyone else who prizes modesty.
The nurses’ case is being backed by the Christian Legal Centre. “This case demonstrates as clear as day that this is an issue of biology not ideology,” said Andrea Williams, chief executive of the CLC. “Once we lose a sense of physical reality all kinds of real and dangerous consequences emerge. Legislating to protect and promote ‘gender identity’ places women at risk, which is so strikingly evidenced in this case. There should be no place in workplaces for transgender ideology that denies science and biological reality, and which is exploited in this way.”
“The nurses in this hospital have spoken out with fear and trepidation,” Williams continued. “Between them they have decades of experience on hospital wards, and they are the ones that should be protected and comforted as they simply seek to do the job they love without fear of retribution for speaking up. We stand with this dedicated group of professionals and will pursue this matter until common sense prevails and justice is done.”
The hospital says that the allegations will be fully investigated and reviewed. According to the Mail, “Rose” declined to comment.
BREAKING: Kim Dotcom And Alex Jones Try To Stop Imminent Nuclear War